Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The role of primary care professionals in women's experiences of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study

By Natalie Armstrong, Veronica James and Mary Dixon-Woods

Abstract

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Family Practice following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Family practice (in press) is available online at: http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/.BACKGROUND: The UK Cervical Screening Programme, delivered mostly through primary care, commands impressive levels of public support. However, considerable evidence suggests that women find the experience of screening problematic. OBJECTIVE: To investigate this tension using women's accounts of cervical screening, with a view to informing practice to better meet their needs. METHODS: A qualitative interview study with 34 participants focussed on their experiences and understandings of cervical cancer screening in the UK. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method. RESULTS: The highly intimate and personal nature of the test is challenging, and many women report unsatisfactory experiences. Problematic issues include: embarrassment and discomfort (sometimes severe) in exposing an intimate and personal part of their body; surrendering control and finding the test painful, uncomfortable and personally threatening. Though there is an important role for primary health care professionals in easing discomfort and facilitating positive experiences, women often report feeling disappointed with how the procedure is conducted. Women suggest that practitioners' attempts to normalize the interaction and maintain a degree of detachment could have the perverse effect of making them feel more uncomfortable and that more personalization would be welcome. CONCLUSIONS: This work identifies the ways in which women may find personal engagement with cervical screening difficult and demonstrates the important role of primary care practitioners in contributing to women's experiences of the encounter. We draw on Erving Goffman's work on the 'interaction order' to explain some of the problems reported by women and to help inform good practice in primary care.Peer-reviewedPost-prin

Topics: Cervical cancer, health professional, health promotion, qualitative research, screening
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1093/fampra
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9983
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2011). Actions speak louder than words: the embodiment of trust by healthcare professionals in gynae-oncology. Sociol Health Illn. doi
  2. An integration model of organizational trust.
  3. (1963). barriers and motivators related to cervical cancer screening among Korean-American women. Cancer Nurs. 2000;23:168-75. Goffman E. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings.
  4. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. doi
  5. Care = organisation + physical labour + emotional labour. Sociol Health Illn. doi
  6. Designing samples. In:
  7. Discourse and the individual in cervical cancer screening. doi
  8. I do not need to. . .. I do not want to. . .. I do not give it priority. . ..”—why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening. Health Expect. doi
  9. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. doi
  10. Minor courtesies and macro structures.
  11. (1970). Nothing unusual is happening.
  12. (2007). Sociocultural barriers to cervical screening in South Auckland, New Zealand. Soc Sci Med. doi
  13. (2005). Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain. Soc Sci Med. doi
  14. The art of surveillance or reasonable prevention? The case of cervical screening. Sociol Health Illn.1995;17:441-57. doi
  15. (2004). The Body in Society: An Introduction.
  16. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. doi
  17. (1983). The Managed Heart: The Commercialization of Human Feeling. doi
  18. The management of embarrassment and sexuality in health care. doi
  19. (1998). Women’s lay knowledge of cervical cancer cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics. J Adv Nurs. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.