Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Subsistence of Copyright: A Systematic Approach in the Context of Computer Programs on the Internet

By Vladislav Golynker
Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1992). (eds.) Postmodernism and Social Theory, Blackwell Publishing, doi
  2. (1995). 1245 With reference to proof of access in this context, see Nimmer, at 13-10,
  3. (1957). 1320 17 USC § 101. See further House Report, at 54-55. 1321 See Parfums Givenchy,
  4. (1967). 2d 675 (1st Cir.
  5. (1968). 2d 890, 893 (9th Cir.1983). See further subs. 4.3.2.B.d, below. 1289 House Report, at 53. 1290 See s. 47AB (a), the Copyright Act
  6. (1995). 533 F.2d 87 (2d Cir. doi
  7. (1982). 76; Ibcos, at 305. Cf. Neale v Harmer (1897) 13 TLR 209. See further Copinger, at 409. 1230 See also Atari , Inc. v North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F. 2d 607 (7th Cir.
  8. (1996). A Brave New World of Technical Protection Systems: Will There Still Be Room for Copyright?”
  9. (2000). A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Blackwell Publishers, doi
  10. (1994). A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace”, Declaration-Final.html>
  11. (2000). A Framework for Electronic Commerce, Hart Publishing
  12. (1993). A Handbook of European Software Law,
  13. (1994). A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs” doi
  14. (1996). A Philosophy of Intellectual Property, doi
  15. (1992). Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works”
  16. (1992). Altai Compared to the EC Software Directive: Transatlantic Convergence of CR Standards Favouring Software Interoperability”
  17. (1997). American Dental Association v Delta Dental Plains Association, 39 USPQ. 2d 1714
  18. (1992). An Introduction to the “Enneads”,
  19. (1995). and the Internet: An Essay on Law-Making in Cyberspace”
  20. (1983). Applied Art and Industrial Design: A Suggested Approach to Copyright in Useful Articles”
  21. (1996). at 41, 54; Ellerman, D., “Property and the Theory of Value”
  22. (1994). Authorship of Films and Implementation of the Term Directive: The Dramatic Tale of Two Copyrights”
  23. (1987). Brandir Int., Inc. v Cascade Pacific Lumber Co., 834 F. 2d 1142, 1145 (2d Cir.
  24. (1995). Brief Amicus Curiae: Applying Fundamental Copyright Principles to Lotus Development Corp. v Borland International, Inc.”
  25. (1986). Case 14/83 [1984] ECR 1891 Walker v Time Life Films, Inc., 784 F. 2d 44 (2d Cir.
  26. (2001). Caught in a Web: Intellectual Property in Cyberspace, Derwent Information, doi
  27. (1983). Common Law Intellectual Property and the Legacy of International News Service v. doi
  28. (1987). Computer Programs and Technological Innovations: Testing the Copyright Law”
  29. (1992). Computer Programs. User Interfaces; Section 102 (6) of the Copyright Act of 1976: A Critique of Lotus v Paperback” doi
  30. (1985). Computer Software - The Final Frontier: Clones, Compatibility and Copyright”
  31. (1997). Copyright and its Substitutes”
  32. (2001). Copyright and Software IPRs: is Contract Still King?”
  33. (1986). Copyright and Software Technology infringement: Defining Third Party Development Rights”
  34. (1985). Copyright in the “Look and
  35. (2000). Copyright in the New Digital Environment: The Need to Redesign Copyright, doi
  36. (2000). Copyright in the New Digital Environment: The Need to Redesign Copyright, Sweet doi
  37. (1993). Copyright Protection for Computer Programs, Databases and Computer Generated Works: Is Anything New Since CONTU?” doi
  38. (1994). Copyright Protection of Computer Program Structure”
  39. (1983). Copyright Protection of Computer Programs”
  40. Copyright Protection of Computer Software”[1996] doi
  41. (1998). Could Java Change Everything? The Competitive Propriety of a Proprietary Standard” doi
  42. (1989). Deconstruction and Philosophy. Texts of Jacques Derrida, doi
  43. (1992). Defining Computer Program Parts Under Learned Hand’s Abstraction Test doi
  44. (1988). Derrida and Différance, doi
  45. (2001). Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet, Prometheus Books, doi
  46. (1966). Discourse on Method and Other Writings, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books,
  47. (1980). Dissecting Krofft: An Expression of New Ideas in Copyright?”
  48. (1970). Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press?”
  49. (1999). Epistemology and Ontology: The Arguments of the Philosophers, Routledge,
  50. (1987). Expanding Computer Software Protection by Limiting the Idea”
  51. (1987). Farmers Independent Telephone Co. v Thorman,
  52. (1991). Feist v Rural Telephone: The Beginning of the End of Software Overprotection”
  53. (2000). France” in Campbell, at 138 Gendreau, Y., “The Copyright Civilisation in Canada”
  54. (1971). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives, doi
  55. (1998). Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, Butterworths, 2nd ed., doi
  56. (1993). Implementation of the European Community Software Directive in Germany”
  57. (1992). Implementation, Compliance and Enforcement: The European Community Directive for the Legal Protection of Computer Software"
  58. (1983). in Fabrica the Ninth Circuit formulated a seminal approach by revising the prior standards in the field and finally disposing of the ‘sole 1322 See Denicola, R., “Applied Art and Industrial Design: A Suggested Approach to Copyright in Useful Articles”
  59. in fact, as indicated in this study, a clear solution lies in the originality analysis as such. 1349 Cf. Nimmer, at 13-130. 1350 Or probably the fact/expression distinction including the conceptualisation of factual compilations.
  60. (2001). Intellectual Property Law, doi
  61. (1999). Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights, doi
  62. (1988). International Copyright Law and Practice, doi
  63. (2001). International Copyright: Principles, Law and Practice,
  64. (1996). Is Copyright Coping with the Electronic Age?"
  65. (1984). Johns Hopkins
  66. (1989). Justifying Intellectual Property” doi
  67. (1997). Law and the Internet. Regulating Cyberspace, doi
  68. (1994). Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms” doi
  69. (1991). LEXIS 11790 (hereinafter “Harper House –2”), at paras. 13, 14. 1332 See Harper House, at 203-204; Harper House-2, at paras. 17-18. 1333 See Harper House, at 202. 1334 Ibid., at 203. See also Cash Dividend Check Corp. v Davis, 247 F. 2d 458-460 (9th Cir.
  70. (2002). Linking and Framing: A Comparative Law Approach” doi
  71. (1971). Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v American Honda Motor Co.,
  72. (1989). NEC v Intel – A New US Approach to Reverse Engineering of Software”
  73. (1997). Nimmer on Copyright: A Treatise on the Law of Literary, doi
  74. (1997). Nimmer on Copyright: A Treatise on the Law of Literary, Musical and Artistic Property, and the Protection of Ideas, doi
  75. (1997). No Regulation, Government Regulation, or Self-Regulation: Social Enforcement or Social Contracting for Governance in Cyberspace”
  76. (1983). On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism, doi
  77. (1988). on the Douglas Dissent in Lee v. Runge”
  78. (1992). Originality and Creativity in Copyright Law” doi
  79. (1992). Originality in Computer Programs: Discerning the Limits of Protection Under Copyright Laws of France and the United States”
  80. (1992). Originality of the Copyrighted Work: a European Respective”
  81. (2002). Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines, Foundation Press, 5th ed.,
  82. (1991). Porphyry’s Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition: A Study of Postplotinian Neoplatonism, Kluwer,
  83. (1990). Process, or Protected Expression?: Determining the Scope of Copyright Protection of the Structure of Computer Programs” doi
  84. (1986). Propriete Litteraire et Artistique” doi
  85. (1999). Putting Cars on the ‘Information Superhighway’: Authors, Exploiters and Copyright in Cyberspace” in Hugenholtz, doi
  86. (1992). Revenge of the Luddites: A Closer Look at Computer Associates v Altai”
  87. (1984). Revisited: the Case Against Computer Programs in Machine Readable Form” doi
  88. (1990). See further House Report, at 55; Lloyd, at 351. 1325 See Nimmer, at 2-96. Cf. Harper House, at 202. 1326 Fabrica, Inc. v El Dorado Corp., F. 2d 890,
  89. (1995). See further Lloyd, at 335. See also Computer Associates, at 709; Lai, at 23; Nimmer, at 2-202,
  90. (1999). Simplifying Copyright Law: Proposal from Down Under”
  91. (1987). Software, and the New Protectionism” doi
  92. (1973). Speech and Phenomena’ and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, doi
  93. (2001). Stile is Free’: Designs Beware”
  94. (1991). Substantial part/substantial similarity confusion: passing over the Computer Associates Intern, Inc. v Altai,
  95. (2003). Text, Cases, and Materials, doi
  96. (1987). The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works: doi
  97. (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato, doi
  98. (2000). The Copyright Protection of Computer Software in the United Kingdom, doi
  99. (1992). The EC Directive on the Legal Protection of Computer Software: New Law Governing Software Development”
  100. (1994). The EC Software Directive: A View from the United States of America”
  101. (1995). The Emperor’s Clothes Still Fit Just Fine – Or, Copyright is Dead. Long Live Copyright”
  102. (1998). The Ethics of Copyright Law”
  103. (2001). The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age, Vintage,
  104. (1993). The History of the EC Software Directive”
  105. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell Publishing, 2nd ed., doi
  106. (1989). The Information Society: Economic, Social, and Structural Issues, Lawrence Erlbaum, doi
  107. (1995). The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The
  108. (1999). The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law. The British Experience, 1760-1911, doi
  109. (1998). The Myth of Private Ordering: Rediscovering Legal Realism in Cyberspace” doi
  110. (2000). The Ontology of Cyberspaces: Philosophy, Law, and the Future of Intellectual Property,
  111. (1987). The Plains Truth: Program Structure, Input Formats, and Other Functional Works”
  112. (1994). The Proper Legal Regime for Cyberspace”
  113. (1995). The Protection of Intellectual Property, International Trade and doi
  114. (1996). The Rise of Law in Cyberspace” doi
  115. (1988). The Role of Experts in Software Infringement Cases”
  116. (1993). The Software Directive - Between the Combat against Piracy and the Preservation of Undistorted Competition”
  117. (1971). The Structure of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right”
  118. (1997). there is a (doctrinally and statutorily drawn) distinction between registered designs protected 1299 See American Dental Association v Delta Dental Plans Association, 126 F. 3d 977, 978 (7th Cir.
  119. (1987). Total Information Processing systems v. Daman [1992] FSR 171 ..................................
  120. (1985). Toward a Comprehensive Test for Software Copyright Infringement”
  121. (1994). Traité de la propriété littéraire et artistique, doi
  122. (1994). Two Fashionable Mistakes” [2000] EIPR 103; Genderau, Y., “The Copyright Civilisation
  123. (2000). Two Treatises of Government, doi
  124. (1999). Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor, Harper Collins, doi
  125. (2001). What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?” doi
  126. (2003). World Copyright Law. doi
  127. (1986). World Copyright Law. Protection of Authors' Works, Performances, Phonograms, Films, Video, Broadcasts,
  128. (1998). World Copyright Law. Protection of Authors’ Works, Performances, Phonograms, Films, Video,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.