Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Modelling Output and Inflation Using Direct Measures of Expectations

By Jacinta Paula Pires


The author's full name is: Jacinta Paula de Campos Viera PiresThis thesis provides an applied macroeconometric study of the determination of\ud output and inflation and of stabilization policy. Its focus is on the time series analysis\ud of output and inflation, concentrating on the use of direct measures of expectations\ud and data obtained in real time, and modelled in multivariate settings. Direct measures\ud of expectations are useful in this study as they allow a better understanding of\ud the expectations formation processes as well as the role played by expectations in the\ud output and inflation dynamics and in the conduct of monetary policy. The use of real\ud time data is important as it focuses on information sets available when decisions are\ud made. This study considers three empirical exercises using actual and expected output\ud and inflation series for the UK and US for the last forty years and making use of\ud different sources of survey data. They are presented to build an increasingly sophisticated\ud picture of the interactions between growth, inflation and stabilization policy.\ud The first chapter concentrates on the measurement of actual and expected inflation\ud and output from different sources of survey data, eventually developing a multivariate\ud framework with which to analyse expectations at different time horizons. The\ud second chapter concentrates on the dynamics between actual and expected inflation\ud and output, developing a simple growth model that distinguishes between the longrun\ud trend in output and short and medium term fluctuation around that trend, with\ud inflation assumed to be driven by a model of time-consistent monetary policy. The\ud last chapter builds on the previous ones by considering a small macro model of the\ud economy based on three main behavioural relationships: a Phillips curve, an IS curve\ud and a monetary policy rule; its focus is on the role of expectations in the conduct of\ud monetary policy

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity”, doi
  2. (1999). A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules”, in Taylor, J.B.,Monetary Policy Rules, doi
  3. (2003). A Real-time Data set for Macroeconomists: Does the Data Vintage Matter? doi
  4. (2001). A Real-time Data set for Macroeconomists”. doi
  5. (1977). A Study of Price Forecasts”,
  6. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function, doi
  7. (1980). Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts”, doi
  8. (1986). Alternative Explanations of theMoney-Income Correlation”, doi
  9. (1997). America’s Peacetime Inflation: The 1970s”, in doi
  10. (1979). An Analysis of Annual and Multiperiod Quarterly Forecasts of Aggregate Income, Output and the Price Level” doi
  11. (1986). An Econometric Model of U.K. Manufacturing Employment Using Survey Data on Expected Output”, doi
  12. (1977). An Empirical Investigation of Inflationary Expectations”, doi
  13. (1999). An Optimizing IS-LM Specification for Monetary Policy and Business Cycle Analysis”, doi
  14. (1986). Are Business Cycles all alike?” doi
  15. (1986). Are Forecasting Models Usable for Policy Analysis?”,Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis ,
  16. (2006). Are US Output Expectations Unbiased? A Cointegrated VAR Analysis in Real Time”, doi
  17. (2002). Assessing Nominal Income Rules for Monetary Policy with Model and Data Uncertainty” doi
  18. C.(1997a), “Inflation/Output Variance Trade-offs and Optimal Monetary Policy”, doi
  19. C.(1997b), “The (un)importance of Forward-Looking Behaviour in Price Specifications”, doi
  20. (1993). Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance”, doi
  21. (1995). Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling, Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, doi
  22. (1987). Cointegration and Error-Correction Representation, doi
  23. (2003). Did the Great Inflation Occur despite Policymaker Commitment to a Taylor Rule?,”Working Paper 2003-20, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. doi
  24. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules doi
  25. (2005). Do Expected Future Marginal Cost Drive Inflation Dynamics?”, doi
  26. (2007). Do Macro Variables, Asset Markets or Surveys Forecast Inflation Better?”, doi
  27. (1989). Does Monetary Policy Matter? A new test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz, doi
  28. (1999). Does the Time-consistency Problem Explain the Behaviour of Inflation in the United States?, doi
  29. (1981). Econometric Analysis of Time Series, doi
  30. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique”, doi
  31. Efficient Rules for Monetary Policy”, doi
  32. (1970). Empirical Evidence on the Formation of Price Expectations”, doi
  33. (2005). Endogenous Monetary Policy with Unobserved Potential Output, doi
  34. (2005). Estimating New-Keynesian Phillips curves: a Full Information Maximum Likelihood Approach”, doi
  35. (1998). Expectation Traps and Discretion”, doi
  36. (2002). Expectation Traps andMonetary Policy”, doi
  37. (2003). Expectations and the Effects of Monetary Policy,” doi
  38. (1972). Expectations and the Neutrality of Money”, doi
  39. (2000). Expectations Formation and Business Cycle Fluctuations:an Empirical Analysis of Actual and doi
  40. (1984). Expectations Formations andMacro-econometricModelling” inMalgrange,
  41. (1994). Formation of Price and Cost InflationExpectations in British Industries: a Multi-Sectoral Analysis”, doi
  42. (1999). Forward-looking Rules for Monetary Policy”, in doi
  43. (1998). Generalised Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models”, doi
  44. (2003). Inflation and Monetary Policy in the Twentieth Century”, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives,
  45. (1999). Inflation Dynamics: a Structural Econometric Analysis”, doi
  46. (1997). Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets”, doi
  47. (1995). Inflation Persistence”, doi
  48. (1999). Inflation Targeting: Some Extensions”, doi
  49. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy”, doi
  50. (1999). Interest Rate Rules in Estimated Sticky Price Models” in doi
  51. (1993). Introducing: the Survey of Professional Forecasters”, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review Nov./Dec.,
  52. (1997). Is Inflation sticky?”,
  53. (2001). Is the Fed too Timid? Monetary Policy in an Uncertain World” doi
  54. (1995). Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, doi
  55. (1977). Long-Term Contracts, Rational Expectations and the Optimal Money Supply Rule”, doi
  56. (2000). Measuring Output Trends Using Actual and doi
  57. (2002). Monetary Policy and Stagflation in the U.K.”, Bank of England, Working Paper no 155.
  58. (2003). Monetary Policy Evaluation with Noisy Information”, doi
  59. (1999). Monetary Policy Loss Functions: Two Cheers for the Quadratic”, Bank of England, Working Paper no 101. doi
  60. (2000). Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability:Evidence and Some Theory”, doi
  61. (1998). Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence”, doi
  62. Monetary Policy Rules, doi
  63. (2004). Monetary Policy Rules, Macroeconomic Stability and Inflation: A View from the Trenches”, doi
  64. (1997). Monetary Policy when Interest Rates are Bounded at Zero”, doi
  65. (2001). Monetary Rules based on Real-Times Data”, doi
  66. (1968). Money-Wage Dynamics and LabourMarket Equilibrium”, doi
  67. (1995). New Keynesian economics and the Phillips curve”, doi
  68. (1986). News or Noise: an doi
  69. Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effect of a Shock to Monetary Policy”, NBER, Working Paper no 8403. doi
  70. (1978). On Testing for Rationality: Another Look at the Livingston Price Expectations Data”, doi
  71. (1952). On the Time Shape of Survey
  72. (1995). Optimal Contracts for Central Bankers”,
  73. (2007). Overcoming Measurement Error Problems in the doi
  74. (1999). Policy rules for Inflation targeting”, in doi
  75. (1997). Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: an Empirical Investigation”, doi
  76. R.J.(1997), “Central Bank Preferences and Macroeconomic Equilibrium”, doi
  77. (1961). Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements”, doi
  78. (1999). Recent Developments in the Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules”, Homer Jones Memorial Lecture, doi
  79. (1998). Rethinking the Role of NAIRU in Monetary Policy: Implications ofModel Formulation and Uncertainty,” doi
  80. (2002). Robust Monetary Policy Rules with unknown Natural Rates”, doi
  81. (1999). Robustness of Simple Monetary Policy Rules under Model Uncertainty”, doi
  82. (1977). Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans”, doi
  83. (2002). Rules Rather than Discretion” After Twenty Five Years: What Have we Learned? What More Can We Learn?”, Working Paper 530, Boston College and NBER.
  84. (1983). Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy”, doi
  85. (1989). Some Tests for Unbiasedness in the Long-run Using Survey Data”, doi
  86. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximising Framework”, doi
  87. (1979). Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model”, doi
  88. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors”, doi
  89. (2002). Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve”, doi
  90. (2000). Structural Analysis of Vector Error Correction Models with Exogenous I(1) Variables”, doi
  91. (1998). Taylor’s Rule and the Fed: 1970-1997”, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
  92. (1990). Testing the Rationality of Price Forecasts: New Evidence from a Panel Data”,
  93. (1996). Testing the Rationality of Survey Data Using the Weighted Double-Boostrapped Method of Moments”, doi
  94. (1984). Tests for Rationality of the Carlson-Parkin Inflation Expectations Data”, doi
  95. (1982). Tests of Equilibrium Macroeconomics Using Contemporaneous Monetary Data”, doi
  96. (1987). The Accuracy and Rationality of UK Inflation Expectations: Some Quantitative Evidence”, doi
  97. (1999). The Conquest of American Inflation, doi
  98. (2005). The Decline of Activist Stabilization Policy: Natural rate misperceptions, learning and expectations”, doi
  99. (1989). The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances”, doi
  100. The Effects ofMonetary Policy Shocks: Evidence from the Flow of Funds”, doi
  101. (1988). The Estimation of Inflation Forecasts from Business Survey Data”, doi
  102. (2002). The Evolution of Economic Understanding and Postwar Stabilization Policy”, in Rethinking Stabilization Policy, 11-78, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, doi
  103. (2001). The Inexorable and Mysterious Trade-off between Inflation and Unemployment”, doi
  104. (1989). The Informational Content of Ex-ante Forecasts”, doi
  105. (1996). The Lead of Output Over Inflation
  106. (1987). The Limits to Rational Expectations, doi
  107. (2002). The NAIRU in Theory and Practice”, doi
  108. (1997). The NAIRU, Unemployment and Monetary Policy”, doi
  109. (2007). The New Consensus in Monetary Policy: Is the NKM fit for the purpose of inflation targeting?,” in Arestis, P. (ed) Is There a New Consensus in Macroeconomics?, Palgrave McMillan.
  110. (2000). The New IS-LM Model: Language, Logic and Limits”, Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,
  111. (1985). The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target”, doi
  112. (2003). The Quest for Prosperity without Inflation”, doi
  113. (1958). The Relationship between Unemployment and the Rate of doi
  114. (1999). The Robustness and Efficiency of Monetary Policy Rules for Interest Rate Setting by the European Central Bank”, doi
  115. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy”, doi
  116. (1999). The Science of Monetary Policy: a New Keynesian Perspective”, doi
  117. (2001). The Taylor Rule and doi
  118. (1997). The Time-Varying NAIRU and Its Implications for Policy”, doi
  119. (1956). TheMonetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation”,
  120. (1994). Time Series Analysis, doi
  121. (1995). Two Fallacies Concerning Central Bank Independence”, NBER, Working Paper no 5075. doi
  122. (2000). UK Monetary Policy 1972-97: a Guide Using Taylor Rules”, Bank of England Working Paper 120. doi
  123. (1997). Unemployment, Wage Dispersion and Labour Market Flexibility” , doi
  124. (1994). What Determines the Sacrifice Ratio?”, doi
  125. (2003). Where is the Natural Rate? Rational Policy Mistakes and Persistent Deviations of Inflation from Target”, doi
  126. (2006). Why Inflation Rose and Fell: Policy-Makers Beliefs and U.S. Postwar Stabilization Policy”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.