Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Quality Improvement through Clinical Communities: Eight Lessons for Practice

By Emma-Louise Aveling, Graham P. Martin, Natalie Armstrong, Jay Banerjee and Mary Dixon-Woods


Purpose: Approaches to quality improvement in healthcare based on clinical communities are founded in practitioner networks, peer influence and professional values. Evidence for the value of this approach, and how to make it effective, is spread across multiple disciplines. We review and synthesise relevant literature to provide practical lessons on how to use clinical community-based approaches to improve quality.\ud Design/methodology/approach: Diverse literatures were identified, analysed and synthesised in a manner which accounted for the heterogeneity of methods, models and contexts they covered.\ud Findings: A number of overlapping but distinct clinical community-based approaches can be identified in the literature, each suitable for different problems. The evidence for the effectiveness of these is mixed, but there is some agreement on the challenges that those adopting such approaches need to address, and how these can be surmounted.\ud Practical implications: Key lessons include: the need for coordination and leadership alongside the lateral influence of peers; advantages of starting with a clear programme theory of change; the need for training and resources; dealing with conflict and marginalisation; fostering a sense of community; appropriate use of data in prompting behavioural change; the need for balance between ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ strategies; and the role of context.\ud Originality/value: The paper brings together diverse literatures with important implications for community-based approaches to quality improvement, drawing on these to offer practical lessons for those engaged in improving healthcare quality in practice.This work was funded by the Health Foundation, registered charity 286967, as part of its evaluation of the Closing the Gap through Clinical Communities programme.Peer-reviewedPre-prin

Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing
Year: 2012
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A primer on leading the improvement of systems. doi
  2. (2009). A systematic narrative review of quality improvement models in health care. Edinburgh: NHS Quality Improvement Scotland.
  3. (2008). A theoretical sketch of medical professionalism as a normative complex. doi
  4. (2006). Achieving high performance in health care systems: The impact and influence of organisational arrangements.
  5. (2006). An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. doi
  6. (1995). Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement / total quality management: Concept versus implementation.
  7. (2004). available online at
  8. (1997). Between the gift and the market: The economy of regard. doi
  9. (2007). Building contexts that support effective community responses to HIV/AIDS: A South African case study. doi
  10. (2001). Business process re-engineering: Lost hope or learning opportunity? doi
  11. (2002). Clinical networks. doi
  12. (2009). Collaboratives. London: The Health Foundation.
  13. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: doi
  14. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. doi
  15. (2008). Conflicting community commitments: A dialogical analysis of a British woman's World War II diaries. doi
  16. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. doi
  17. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. doi
  18. (2005). eds, Handbook of entrepreneurship research. doi
  19. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. doi
  20. (2006). Empowerment to participate: A Case study of participation by Indian sex workers in HIV prevention. doi
  21. (2003). Enacting leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in the activities of partnership managers. doi
  22. (2008). Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. doi
  23. (2001). Evidence-based medicine and organisational change: An overview of some recent qualitative research.
  24. (2011). Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. doi
  25. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care. doi
  26. (2009). Health data, indicators and rankings. Paper presented at Measuring Healthcare,
  27. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. doi
  28. (2010). Healthcare professionals' views on clinician engagement in quality improvement. London: The Health Foundation.
  29. (2004). How can clinicians measure safety and quality in acute care? doi
  30. (2009). Leadership, service reform and public-service networks: The case of cancer-genetics pilots in the English NHS. doi
  31. (2008). Learning through transitions: The role of institutions. doi
  32. (2004). Managing across diverse networks of care: lessons from other sectors.
  33. (2009). Managing expert knowledge: Organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession. doi
  34. (2007). Necessary contradictions of ‘community-led’ health promotion: A case study of HIV prevention in an Indian red light district. doi
  35. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organisation.
  36. (2010). Networks as institutional support: law firm and venture capitalist relations and regional diversity in high technology IPOs. doi
  37. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge intensive industries. doi
  38. (2005). Networks: a key to the future of health services. doi
  39. (2002). No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence-based. doi
  40. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families.
  41. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. doi
  42. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: doi
  43. (2002). Physician communities of practice: Where learning and practice are inseparable. doi
  44. (2003). Principles of economic sociology. doi
  45. (2009). Reality check for checklists. doi
  46. (2009). Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the 'modernisation' of the medical workforce. doi
  47. (2008). Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in healthservice management. doi
  48. (2000). Rule enforcement among peers: A lateral control regime. doi
  49. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework.
  50. (2000). Social networks in Silicon Valley. In:
  51. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. doi
  52. (2010). Systematic reviews and qualitative methods. doi
  53. (2010). Team work in context: Institutional mediation in the public-service professional bureaucracy. doi
  54. (1990). Technology transfer: A communication perspective. doi
  55. (1984). The changing nature of professional control. doi
  56. (2003). The ecology of open-source software development.
  57. (2006). The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: The triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy. doi
  58. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. doi
  59. (2001). The inevitability of reinvention in project-based learning. Paper presented at the 17th EGOS Colloquium,
  60. (2011). The third sector, user involvement and public-service reform: A case study in the co-governance of health-service provision. Public Administration doi
  61. (2008). Translating evidence into practice: A model for large scale knowledge translation. doi
  62. (2005). Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: From summative to interpretive synthesis. doi
  63. (2010). What is this knowledge that we seek to "exchange"? doi
  64. (2007). Why don't clinicians engage with quality improvement? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.