Location of Repository

What are we to do with feral publishers?

By David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Kenneth Weir

Abstract

This pre-print has been submitted for publication to the journal 'Organization' (Sage).This article examines the profits and practices of commercial journal publishers and argues for an appropriate response from the academic community.Pre-prin

Publisher: Sage
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1177/1350508412448859
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9689
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2011). Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist’, The Guardian, 30 August. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdochsocialist; last accessed 31.08.2011.
  2. Available at http://www.ams.org/notices/200705/comm-toped-web.pdf; last accessed 19.08.2011.
  3. Available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39902.htm; last accessed 19.08.2011.
  4. (2007). Jumping ship: Topology board resigns’,
  5. (2002). Office of Fair Trading doi
  6. (2007). Pricing of scientific journals and market power’, doi
  7. (2004). The Costs and Benefits of Library Site Licenses to Academic Journals’, doi
  8. (2010). Trends in the finances of UK higher education libraries: 1999−2009, September (London: RIN and SCONUL). Available at http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/library_trends_report_screen.pdf; last accessed 16.08.2011.
  9. (2006). UK scholarly journals:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.