Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Knowledge and Skills that Science Teachers Need for Teaching the Nature of Science

By Kwok–chi Lau


Nature of science (NOS) has long been a highly valued element of science education, but it remains largely ignored in science classrooms despite decades of efforts in promoting it. Past research mostly focuses on curricular efforts and NOS understanding of teachers and students to the exclusion of in depth examination of NOS teaching in actual classrooms. The studies targeting NOS teaching, however, often put heavy emphasis on the intentions and beliefs of teachers to account for whether or not NOS aspects are addressed in the classrooms. These types of studies still treat NOS teaching as a black box without addressing the complex interplays between teachers and students in class, and also fail to address the issues pertaining to the competence of teachers in NOS teaching. This study seeks to delineate and understand the complex dynamics of NOS teaching in actual classroom contexts in order to shed light on the knowledge and skills that science teachers need to teach NOS. The study employed a multiple case study design, examining in depth the NOS teaching attempts of eight science teachers in Hong Kong. Data were collected mainly through class observations, interviews, and analysis of teaching plans. The NOS understandings and constructivist pedagogy of the teachers were assessed with quantitative instruments. A framework for the key characteristics of NOS teaching is established based on the literature and empirical findings of this study. Three knowledge bases are found connected with these characteristics: knowledge of NOS, pedagogical knowledge and skills to teach NOS in a constructivist and dialogic manner, and knowledge of the contexts for NOS teaching, such as history of science.\ud The implications of the findings to teacher training and curriculum development pertinent to NOS were discussed

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1985). A constructivist approach to curriculum development.
  2. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice.
  3. (2002). A History of the Life Sciences, Third Edition,
  4. (1972). A national experiment in curriculum evaluation.
  5. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.
  6. (1974). An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special reference to high-ability students studying physics.
  7. (1997). Analysis and description of students‟ learning during science classes using a constructivist-based model.
  8. (1968). Analysis of instructional outcomes of students involved with three sources in high school chemistry.
  9. (2002). Assessing explicit and tacit conceptions of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers.
  10. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: A historical perspective. In
  11. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In
  12. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In
  13. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives.
  14. (1994). Case studies‟, in
  15. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research‟,
  16. (1998). Conceptual change teaching. In
  17. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: an exploratory investigation,
  18. (1998). Creating dissonance in prospective teachers‟ conceptions of teaching and learning science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego (Eric Document Reproduction Service no.
  19. (2000). Developing and acting upon one‟s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study.
  20. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice teachers‟ views and instructional planning.
  21. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry.
  22. (2004). DNA: the secret of life.
  23. (2001). Education. Available on-line aba81eb490ea96bb &pi=3
  24. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students‟ understanding of the nature of science through peer collaboration instruction in science stories.
  25. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism,
  26. (2006). Epistemologial perspectives in research on teaching and learning science. Paper presented at AERA,
  27. (2000). Epistemological undercurrents in scientists‟ reporting of research to teachers.
  28. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks.
  29. (2004). Evaluation on the Implementation of MOI Guidance for Secondary Schools: 1999–2002” commissioned by the Education and Manpower Bureau to the Hong Kong Institute of Education Research of The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  30. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science.
  31. (1991). Exploring the Nature of Science.
  32. (1975). Factors influencing teachers‟ gain in understanding the nature of science.
  33. (2004). Focusing labs on the nature of science.
  34. (1993). for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].
  35. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills:
  36. (2005). from
  37. (2004). from
  38. (1999). goals in an exemplary science teacher‟s practice: cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change.
  39. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks,
  40. (1957). Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science.
  41. (1979). History and quasi-history in physics education Parts I II.
  42. (1971). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In
  43. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse.
  44. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science? A response to Alters.
  45. (1995). How not to teach history of science. In
  46. (1993). Implications of teachers‟ beliefs about NOS: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers.
  47. (1998). Implicit versus Explicit Nature of Science Instruction: An Explicit Response to Palmquist and Finley.
  48. (2000). Improving science teachers‟ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature.
  49. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science.
  50. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity based approach on elementary teachers‟ conceptions of nature of science.
  51. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders‟ views of nature of science.
  52. (1994). Instrumental Biology, or
  53. (1996). Integrated qualitative and quantitative research: Epistemology, history and designs. In
  54. (1998). Intellectual independence : a potential link between science teaching and responsible citizenship.
  55. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods in Education. Thousand Oaks,
  56. (2002). It‟s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science.
  57. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on students‟ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry.
  58. Kong Examination and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). (2007a). Biology curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4-6). Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
  59. Kong Examination and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). (2007b). Integrated science curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4-6). Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
  60. (2006). Learners‟ responses to the demands of conceptual change: considerations for effective nature of science instruction.
  61. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice teachers‟ views of nature of science.
  62. (2007). Learning science teaching: Developing a professional knowledge base.
  63. (2003). Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms,
  64. (1996). National science education standards.
  65. (1999). nature of science : A perspective from the philosophy of science.
  66. (1997). Nature of science: A diversity or uniformity of ideas?
  67. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future,
  68. (2001). Nature-of-science literacy in Benchmarks and Standards: Post-Modern/Relativist or Modern/Realist?
  69. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology.
  70. (1969). Organization and evaluation of an inservice program in the history of science.
  71. (2005). Perhaps triangulation isn‟t enough: A call for crystallization as a methodological referent in NOS research, Paper presented at the American Education Research Association,
  72. (2006). Perusing pandora‟s box: Exploring the what, when, and how of nature of science instruction. In
  73. (1993). Philosophical Stance of Secondary School Science Teachers, Curriculum Experiences, and Children‟s Understanding of Science: Some Preliminary Findings,
  74. (2002). Philosophy of science: a very short introduction.
  75. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy.
  76. (1985). Practical Work in Science. Cambridge:
  77. (1997). Preservice teachers‟ views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program.
  78. (2003). Project ICAN: A multi-layered model of professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA),
  79. (2002). Promoting preservice teachers‟ understanding about the nature of science through history.
  80. (1995). Putting people back into science: Using historical vignettes.
  81. (2009). Qualitative Research in Education: A User's Guide (Second Edition ed.). Thousand Oaks:
  82. (1994). Research on the history and philosophy of science.
  83. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development.
  84. (2004). Revising instruction to teach nature of science.
  85. (1993). Science is dead. We have killed it, you and I – How attacking the presuppositional structures of our scientific age can doom the interrogation of nature.
  86. (2007). Science teachers attitudes and beliefs.
  87. (1987). Science teachers‟ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior?
  88. (1995). Science teachers‟ philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them?
  89. (1994). Science teaching : The role of history and philosophy of science.
  90. (2003). Science: 100 Scientists Who Changed the World.
  91. (2004). Scientific literacy of Hong Hong students and instructional activities in science classrooms.
  92. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, Scheduled for publication.
  93. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
  94. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X?
  95. (2002). sixth-grade students‟ epistemologies of science: the impact of school science experiences on epistemological development.
  96. (1997). Sources from a Somerset village: A model for informal learning about radiation and radioactivity.
  97. (1997). Strategies and activities for initiating and maintaining pressure on students‟ naive views concerning the nature of science.
  98. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue.
  99. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science. In
  100. (2002). Taiwanese students‟ views of nature of science.
  101. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values.
  102. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas.
  103. (1995). Teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Factors that mediate translation into classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teacher in Science,
  104. (1990). Teachers‟ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice.
  105. (1999). Teachers‟ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship.
  106. (2008). Teaching about the epistemology of science in upper secondary schools: an analysis of teachers‟ classroom talk.
  107. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: action research in the classroom.
  108. (2008). Teaching and assessing the nature of science: an introduction.
  109. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher.
  110. (1992). Teaching evolution: Understanding and applying the nature of science.
  111. (2004). Teaching students„ ideas-about-science‟: five dimensions of effective practice,
  112. (2005). Teaching the “nature of science”: Modest adaptations or radical reconceptions?
  113. (2008). Teaching the Nature of Science through Process Skills.
  114. (2005). Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: Questions rather than tenets.
  115. (2001). That‟s what scientists have to do: Preservice elementary teachers‟ conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation.
  116. (1965). The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses.
  117. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints.
  118. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom.
  119. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching.
  120. (2005). The discoveries: great breakthroughs in 20 th -century science, including the original papers.
  121. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
  122. (2001). The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA.
  123. (1977). The effect of a science methods course on the philosophical view of science among elementary education majors.
  124. (1985). The effects of classroom climate on college science students: A replication study.
  125. (1989). The effects of teachers‟ language on students‟ conceptions of the nature of science.
  126. (1992). The historicality of cognition: Implications for science education research.
  127. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists.
  128. (1979). The influence of hands-on science process training on preservice teachers‟ acquisition of process skills and attitude toward science and science teaching.
  129. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students‟ views of nature of science.
  130. (1977). The influence of structured versus unstructured laboratory on students‟ understanding the process of science.
  131. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction.
  132. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural.
  133. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents.
  134. (2001). The Nature of Science. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
  135. (1997). The nature of the laboratory experience: A guide for describing, classifying and enhancing hands-on activities.
  136. (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives (New Directions for Program Evaluation,
  137. (2003). The renewal of case studies in science education.
  138. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education.
  139. (1996). The structure of scientific revolution. 3 rd Edition. Chicago :
  140. (1994). The unnatural nature of science.
  141. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.
  142. (1966). Three emphases in teaching biology: A statistical comparison of the results.
  143. (1993). Transforming subject knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching.
  144. (1999). Undergraduate science students‟ images of science.
  145. (1967). Understanding NOS: A comparison of scientists and science teachers.
  146. (2000). Understandings of the nature of science and decision-making on science and technology based issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  147. (2006). Using and abusing: relating history of science to learning and teaching science, In
  148. (2003). Using newspaper to examine the nature of science.
  149. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). Indianapolis:
  150. (1999). What science is and how it works.
  151. (1997). Whose nature of science?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.