Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

How do students and teachers perceive effective teaching in Hong Kong?

By Ka-yim Chan

Abstract

The present study aimed to explore how the students and the teachers in Hong Kong conceptualised “effective teaching”. 106 Form three students and 3 teachers were asked to rank the significance of forty teaching traits and evaluate the teachers’ teaching performance. A focus group interview and individual interviews were conducted with the students and the teachers respectively. Classroom observations together with follow-up talks were also arranged for the teachers.\ud It was found that both the participating groups had similar though not identical views on the effective aspects of teaching. They generally thought that an effective teacher should use various strategies to motivate students, involve all of the students in the lesson, use a variety of activities/ learning methods, give clear instructions and explanations, and keep students on task throughout the lesson. They also thought that an effective teacher should have a good relationship with his/ her students and make the best use of reinforcements. They agreed with most of the reviewed literature about teaching effectiveness except that they preferred the teacher-centred approaches to the student-centred approaches. This could be mainly due to the cultural differences.\ud Although the teachers claimed that students should take care of their own learning, they did not actively try to encourage their students to do so in reality. For students, a majority group tended to be passive and rely a lot on their teachers while a minority group tended to be more proactive and learn more independently.\ud Since the western theories might not be compatible with the eastern beliefs, it was suggested that teachers should test the theories before use. This could be encouraged by a more bottom-up educational system. It was also suggested that students and teachers should have a more active role to play in teacher evaluation. They should be given more chance to talk and share their perceptions of effective teaching. It is argued that this sharing of perceptions would enable greater consensus to emerge between teachers and students. Last but not least, it would be sensible for teachers to treat teaching as a combination of a science, a craft and an art so that they were better able to meet the expectations of different types of students

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9063

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). (2004).The new Japanese educational reforms and the achievement “crisis” debate”,
  2. (1983). A Practical Handbook for College Teachers,
  3. (2005). A researcher’s dilemma – philosophical and methodological pluralism,
  4. (1997). A study of teachers’ conceptions about mathematics,
  5. (1968). A Study of the Effectiveness of Directive Versus Non-Directive Vocational Teachers as a Function of Students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge,
  6. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives
  7. (2008). A validity study of the certification system of the National Board For Professional Teaching Standards,
  8. (1997). Academic freedom, tenure and student evaluation of faculty: Galloping polls in the 21st century, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5. Retrieved from World Wide Web: http://olam/ed.asu.edu/epaa/
  9. (1980). Accuracy of teacher self-reports: Reports and observations of specific classroom behaviours,
  10. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs,
  11. (1989). Alternative modes of inquiry for agricultural education,
  12. (1975). An introduction to Curriculum Research and Development,
  13. (1973). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness,
  14. (1999). Applying educational research: A practical guide.
  15. (1934). Art as experience, in
  16. (1988). Assessing teacher effectiveness-developing a differentiated model,
  17. (2007). Assessment of Teaching Quality: Survey of University Graduates, paper presented at
  18. (2003). Beauty in the classroom: professor’s pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity, in F. Zabaleta
  19. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language,
  20. (2001). Broadening our approach to teaching evaluation,
  21. (2003). Business research methods, in
  22. (1985). Case Research in marketing: opportunities, problems, and a process, in
  23. (1989). Case Study research: Design and methods,
  24. (1960). Characteristics of teachers: Their description, comparison and appraisal, Washingtom, DC: American Council on Education.
  25. (1996). Chinese students at an Australian University: adaptability and continuity,
  26. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers,
  27. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study,
  28. (1993). Communicative failure in the language classroom: an exploration of causes,
  29. (1984). Conducting and analyzing interviews,
  30. (1981). Conducting focus group session, Studies in family planning,
  31. (2004). Consulting Pupils: what’s in it for schools?,
  32. (1989). Creating an excellent school,
  33. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study.
  34. (1990). Curriculum Development in Hong Kong: education paper 7, Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, Hong
  35. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory into practice,
  36. (1995). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system,
  37. (2006). Dispositions in action: do dispositions make a difference in practice,
  38. (2006). Dispositions in action: do dispositions make a difference in practice?,
  39. (1996). Diversity in information systems research: threat, promise and responsibility,
  40. (1981). Do Black and White students look for the same characteristics in teachers?,
  41. (1990). Educational evaluation and Policy Analysis,
  42. (2000). Educational Research: contemporary issues and practical approaches,
  43. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s view: matched or mismatched priorities,
  44. (1996). Effective teaching and learning – teachers’ and students’ perspectives,
  45. (1998). Effective Teaching; a review of the literature,
  46. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings,
  47. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox Effect,
  48. (1996). Encouraging Learning: Towards a Theory of the Learning School,
  49. (1987). English teacher or English major: expistemological differences in the teaching of English,
  50. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity,
  51. (1988). Essentials of Learning for Instruction,
  52. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice,
  53. (1992). Evaluation in schools: getting started on training and implementtion,
  54. (1976). Evaluation in science teaching, in
  55. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research,
  56. (1994). Experience is the best teacher, or is it? An analysis of the role of experience to teacher,
  57. (1989). Expert-Novice differences in teaching: a cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education,
  58. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances,
  59. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes,
  60. (1976). February/March). The focus group interview and moderator bias,
  61. (1993). Field relations and the problem of authenticity in researching participants’ perceptions of teaching and learning in classrooms,
  62. (1992). Focus group interview: Applications for institutional research (Report No. HE-025-299), Carleton, MN: Carltton College, Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
  63. (1979). Focus group research: Behind the one-way mirror,
  64. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed),
  65. (1988). Focus Groups as qualitative research,
  66. (1997). Focus Groups, Social research Update Issue 19,
  67. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research,
  68. (1991). Focus groups: a qualitative opportunity for researchers,
  69. (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice,
  70. (1991). For every kiasu Singaporean there is a Par Chup She Hongkonger,
  71. (1988). Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
  72. (1993). From theory to practice: a cognitive systems approach.
  73. (2002). From victims of change to agents of change, London,
  74. (2009). Generation II: e-asTTle V6. An internet computer application,
  75. (1996). Good Practice
  76. (1999). Good teaching and learning: pupils and teachers speak, Great Britain:
  77. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings,
  78. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research, Thousand Oaks Calif.:
  79. (1963). Handbook of Research on Teaching,
  80. (1996). Hong Kong Students and their English,
  81. (1988). How Children Think and Learn,
  82. (2007). How does Bennett Woods Elementary School produce such high reading and writing achievement?,
  83. (2000). How People Learn
  84. (1910). How we think, in
  85. (1997). How’m I Doing?
  86. (2008). Identifying accomplished teachers: A validations study,
  87. (2000). Implications for evaluation from a study of students’ perceptions of good and poor teaching,
  88. (1980). Inside the primary classroom, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  89. (1996). Instructor personality and the politics of the classroom,
  90. (1994). Interactive focus group interviewing: a qualitative research method in early intervention,
  91. (1995). Introducing focus groups,
  92. (1998). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approache,.
  93. (1998). Issues regarding the reliability, validity and utility of student ratings of instruction: a survey of research findings.
  94. (1987). Knowledge and Curriculum Planning,
  95. (1968). Language and Mind,
  96. (1999). Learning more about learning improves teacher effectiveness, School effectiveness and school improvement,
  97. (1996). Learning theories and approaches to research: a cross-cultural perspective,
  98. (1992). Learning theories for teachers,
  99. (1994). Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream,
  100. (1999). Let me edutain you, in
  101. (1983). Low Inference Classroom Teaching Behaviours and Student Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness,
  102. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice,
  103. (1993). Making sense of Teaching,
  104. (1997). Making students’ evaluation teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility,
  105. (1998). Managing evaluation and innovation in Language teaching: building bridges,
  106. (1978). Mind in Society,
  107. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time has come,
  108. (1997). Models of learning-tools for teaching,
  109. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry,
  110. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction,
  111. (1996). Ofsted (Office of Standards in Education), SCAA (School Curriculum and Assessment Authority),
  112. (2000). On becoming a Bi-Researcher: The importance of comining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. In Onwuegbuzie,
  113. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching,
  114. (2001). On the Nature of Teaching and Teacher Education: Difficult practices that look easy,
  115. (1998). Organisation Values and Cultures of Secondary Schools in Hong Kong,
  116. (1980). Paradigm in education science: different meaning and purpose to theory,
  117. (1986). Paradigms and Research Programs in the Study of Teaching: A contemporary Perspective,
  118. (2008). passion: primary and secondary teachers’ views on teaching the arts,
  119. (1981). Perceptions of quality of school life: A case study of schools and students (No.
  120. (1973). Personality correlates of teacher-student behaviour in the college classroom,
  121. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects,
  122. (2002). Preservice Teacher Perceptions of Their Best and Worst K-12 Teachers, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association,
  123. (1992). Primary school teacher self concept: its relationship with teacher behaviours and students’ educational outcomes,
  124. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design,
  125. (1902). Principles of school practice,
  126. (1992). Problem fields in mathematics teaching, Part 3. Views of Finnish seventh-graders about mathematics teaching (No.
  127. (1996). Professional development in Hong Kong primary schools: beliefs, practices and change,
  128. (2000). Pupils comment on teaching quality”,
  129. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed), Thousand Oaks,
  130. (2007). Quality Assurance Division, Education Bureau.
  131. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings,
  132. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation: enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness,
  133. (1986). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy,
  134. (2005). Relationship between teachers’ teaching effectiveness and school effectiveness in comprehensive high schools in Taiwan, Republic of China, a paper presented at
  135. (1991). Relationship of observable teaching effectiveness behaviours to MBTI personality types, in
  136. (1982). Renner Substantiated, in M. Huemer, Student evaluations: a critical review. Available at:
  137. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches,
  138. (2000). Research into Teacher Effectiveness: a model of teacher Effectiveness,
  139. (1983). Research methods for political science: Quantitative and qualitative methods.
  140. (1986). Research on teaching effects as a resource for improving instruction,
  141. (1985). Revolution in science.
  142. (1995). School Effectiveness Research: the policy makers’ tool for school improvement, in
  143. (1975). Schoolteacher: a Sociological Study,
  144. (1990). Second Language Teacher Education, USA,
  145. (1991). Self monitoring in teaching,
  146. (1997). Self-evaluation for teachers and student teachers: a framework for professional development,
  147. (1993). Spontaneous collaborative learning a new dimension in student learning experience?
  148. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, Australian Council for Educational Research,
  149. (2000). Student evaluation of teaching: a methodological critique of conventional practices,
  150. (1980). Student Evaluations: The Faculty Responds,
  151. (1997). Student evaluations: the ratings game,
  152. (1971). Student ratings of college teaching: reliability, validity, and usefulness, Review of educational research,
  153. (1990). Student ratings of teaching: recommendations for use,
  154. (2001). Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy,
  155. (1998). Student views of student evaluations of teaching,
  156. (2006). Students’ and Instructors’ beliefs about excellent lecturers and discussion leaders,
  157. (1989). Students’ approaches to learning in Anglo-Chinese schools,
  158. (1997). Students’ evaluations of university teaching,
  159. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research,
  160. (1992). Students’ perceptions of the classroom climate: a descriptive Research Study, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
  161. (1994). Subject matter preparation of secondary Mathematics and Science teachers and student achievement,
  162. (1983). Syllabus for English (Form I-V), Hong Kong.
  163. (1957). Syntactic Structures,
  164. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: insights from
  165. (2002). Talk of embarrassment, exploring the taboo-repression-denial hypothesis, in
  166. (1993). Teacher accountability: why is it central to teacher professional development?,
  167. (1968). Teacher attitude toward evaluation, in
  168. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement,
  169. (1996). Teacher efficacy: toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct,
  170. (1995). Teacher Evaluation: a comprehensive guide to new directions and practice,
  171. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices,
  172. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice,
  173. (1988). Teacher evaluation: improvement, accountability, and effective learning, NY:
  174. (1983). Teacher knowledge and teacher effectiveness: a literature review, theoretical analysis and discussion of research strategy, in H. Thornton
  175. (1974). Teacher perceptions of the teacher evaluation process,
  176. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence, in H. Thornton
  177. (1993). Teacher Self-evaluation; Teachers in their own mirrors,
  178. (1997). Teachers and teaching,
  179. (1992). Teachers love: learning from our own experience,
  180. (1986). Teachers thought processes,
  181. (1986). Teachers’ Accuracy in Self-Reporting about Instructional Practices Using a Focused Self-Report Inventory,
  182. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research,
  183. (1998). Teachers’ practical theories : Implications for preservice Teacher education,
  184. (1991). Teaching appraisal: training and implementation,
  185. (1984). Teaching as a Moral Craft,
  186. (1971). Teaching behaviours and student achievement, London: National Foundation for educational research.
  187. (1975). Teaching effectiveness: its meaning, assessment, and improvement,
  188. (2008). Teaching Quality in California: a new perspective to guide policy,
  189. (1976). Teaching Styles and Pupil
  190. (1986). Teaching tips
  191. (1994). Teaching Tips – strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers,
  192. (1973). The American Heritage dictionary of the English language, in
  193. (1959). The Art of Teaching,
  194. (1938). The behaviour of organisms,
  195. (1985). The betrayal of the gatekeepers: grade inflation,
  196. (1986). The cognitive skill of teacher,
  197. (2004). The development and validation of a student evaluation instrument to identify highly accomplished mathematics teachers,
  198. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency, in
  199. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction,
  200. (1995). The education of teachers of English in Hong Kong: a case for special treatment, in
  201. (1994). The Educational Imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs
  202. (1994). The educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed),
  203. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change,
  204. (1975). The evaluation of teachers in higher education,
  205. (1954). The Evaluation of Teaching: A Progress Report,
  206. (1984). The Impact of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Teaching
  207. (2008). The Impact Study on the Effectiveness of External School Review in Enhancing School Improvement through School Self-evaluation in Hong Kong,
  208. (1997). The Intelligent School.
  209. (1989). The nature of social and educational inquiry: Empiricism versus interpretation,
  210. (1990). The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: assessing elementary and secondary school teachers,
  211. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change,
  212. (1952). The Origin of Intelligence in Children,
  213. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: a review and synthesis,
  214. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do,
  215. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum,
  216. (1990). The Principles of Economics Course: A Handbook for Instructors,
  217. (1992). The processes of innovation in language teacher development: what, why and how teachers change,
  218. (1983). The reflective practitioner,
  219. (1974). The relationship between student and alumni ratings of teachers,
  220. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view.
  221. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching,
  222. (2002). The silent Chinese: the influence of face and kiasuism on student feedback-seeking behaviours,
  223. (1994). The sources of language teachers’ instructional decisions,
  224. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions,
  225. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching, Teaching
  226. (1983). The use of elementary students’ reports to assess the accuracy of teacher self-reports,
  227. (1993). The use of focus groups in a study of attitudes to student nurse assessment,
  228. (1997). The validity of use,
  229. (1993). Theories of Learning and Teaching and the practice of Excellence
  230. (1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture, in The interpretations of culture: selected essays,
  231. (1986). Those who understand –knowledge growth in teaching,
  232. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction,
  233. (1986). Understanding schools as organizations,
  234. (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Available at http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/UN-Convention/
  235. (1957). Verbal Behaviour,
  236. (2009). Visible Learning – a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement,
  237. (1985). Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective,
  238. (1994). What are effective schools? Lessons from East and West. The Australian Educational Researcher,
  239. (2001). What constitutes becoming experienced in teaching and learning?,
  240. (1989). What makes a great teacher?,
  241. (2000). What makes an ideal teacher”,
  242. (2007). Why “what works won’t work” Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research, Educational Theory,
  243. (2006). Why can’t we all get along? Towards a framework for unifying research paradigms.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.