Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Teacher-student Conferencing: Implications for Teaching L2 Writing

By Annie Sui-Ping Leung


It is common practice in Hong Kong for teachers of English as a second language to provide their students with written commentary as the sole source of feedback on their writing. However, there are teachers who question the efficacy of their own writing feedback and express concerns about providing commentary in ways that help their students to effectively revise their texts and to acquire skills that can be applied in future writing tasks. This study set out to test whether teacher-student conferencing could lead to greater improvement in both content and grammatical accuracy in writing tasks. After a pilot study, the main study was carried out on 34 students, who were in their sixth year in secondary school. They were randomly allocated to either the control or experimental group, with the 17 students in the control group receiving written commentary, and the 17 students in the experimental group receiving teacher-student conferencing as their writing feedback. Findings of the main study revealed a statistically significant difference in students’ performance between the experimental and control groups (p < 0.05). The effect size was very large (eta squared > 0.14) in both the paired-samples t-test and the mixed between-within ANOVA. These suggest that teacher-student feedback sessions facilitate improvement more than written feedback. Semi-structured interviews were used with six of the participants to determine student perceptions of the different feedback modes. Analysis of findings revealed that all six interviewees expressed a preference for teacher-student conferencing. These findings were validated through conferences and post conference interviews with another small group of students. The study makes a case for more interactive modes of feedback which focus on the process as well as the product of writing, and for more open teacher-student exchange about the nature of feedback offered in second language classrooms in Hong Kong

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1985). A writer teaches writing (2nd Ed).
  2. (1977). Against behaviouralism: A critique of behavioural science. doi
  3. (2003). An overview of what we investigate and how. In doi
  4. (2001). Considerations for teaching ESL/EFL writing course. doi
  5. (1967). Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of composition. doi
  6. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. doi
  7. (1990). Curriculum development in Hong Kong education papers. Hong Kong: Hong Kong doi
  8. (1978). Educational research: The art and science of investigation.
  9. (1995). Factors shaping the introduction of process writing in Hong Kong secondary schools. doi
  10. (1981). Fall). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art.
  11. (2006). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge: doi
  12. (1982). Finding your own voice: Teaching composition in an age of dissent. Learning by teaching: selected articles on writing and teaching. doi
  13. (1970). Foundations of behavioural research.
  14. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. doi
  15. (1996). Implementing process writing in Hong Kong secondary schools: What the students’ responses tell us?
  16. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In
  17. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. doi
  18. (1993). Planning and accomplishing school-centred evaluation. doi
  19. (1965). Pre-Writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process. doi
  20. (1984). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. doi
  21. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. doi
  22. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. doi
  23. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: doi
  24. (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. doi
  25. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. doi
  26. (1982). Spoken versus written criticism of student writing: Some advantages of the conference method. doi
  27. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. doi
  28. (1962). Structural linguistics and systematic composition teaching to students of English as a second language. doi
  29. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In
  30. (1983). Teaching ESL Composition: Principles
  31. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. doi
  32. (1991). The culture of the English language teacher: A Hong Kong example. doi
  33. (1989). The first five minutes: Setting the agenda in a writing conference. In
  34. (1995). The Hong Kong school curriculum. Hong Kong: Hong Kong doi
  35. (1995). The writing conference as performance.
  36. (1982). What can you say besides awk? In Learning by teaching: selected articles on writing and teaching.
  37. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. doi
  38. (1980). Writing as process: How writing finds its own meaning. In
  39. (1997). Writing center ethics: “Do what I tell you because you control your own writing.” The Writing Lab Newsletter,
  40. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition.
  41. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. doi
  42. (1998). Writing in the Hong Kong secondary classroom: Teachers’ beliefs doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.