Location of Repository

An implementation research agenda

By Martin P. Eccles, David Armstrong, Richard Baker, Kevin Cleary, Huw Davies, Stephen Davies, Paul Glasziou, Irene Ilott, Ann-Louise Kinmonth, Gillian Leng, Stuart Logan, Theresa Marteau, Susan Michie, Hugh Rogers, Jo Rycroft-Malone and Bonnie Sibbald


In October 2006, the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of England asked Professor Sir John Tooke to chair a High Level Group on Clinical Effectiveness in response to the chapter 'Waste not, want not' in the CMOs 2005 annual report 'On the State of the Public Health'. The high level group made recommendations to the CMO to address possible ways forward to improve clinical effectiveness in the UK National Health Service (NHS) and promote clinical engagement to deliver this. The report contained a short section on research needs that emerged from the process of writing the report, but in order to more fully identify the relevant research agenda Professor Sir John Tooke asked Professor Martin Eccles to convene an expert group – the Clinical Effectiveness Research Agenda Group (CERAG) – to define the research agenda. The CERAG's terms of reference were 'to further elaborate the research agenda in relation to pursuing clinically effective practice within the (UK) National Health Service'. This editorial presents the summary of the CERAG report and recommendations

Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/8192

Suggested articles



  1. (2006). A review of UK health research funding. doi
  2. (2001). Changing provider behaviour: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care doi
  3. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote implementation of research findings by health care professionals. BMJ doi
  4. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guidline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess doi
  5. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for general causal inference doi
  6. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. doi
  7. (2001). Getting research into practice. In Oxford handbook of public health practice Edited by: Penchon doi
  8. (2008). Health Research Funding Agencies' Support and Promotion of Knowledge Translation: an International Study. Millbank Quarterly doi
  9. (2007). Healthcare professionals' views on clinician engagement in quality improvement: A literature review. The Health Foundation;
  10. (2007). KT Theories Research Group: Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med doi
  11. (2001). SM: Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. The Milbank Quarterly doi
  12. (2008). The Meaning of Translational Research and Why it Matters. JAMA doi
  13. (2003). Theories of behaviour change in studies of guideline implementation.
  14. (2005). What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? BMC Health Services Research

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.