Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Disciplinary writing: a case study of Hong Kong undergraduates undertaking their writing tasks

By Robert Hak Hung Yiu


In Hong Kong, where English is used as the main medium of instruction in universities, the majority of undergraduates studying in various disciplines are local students whose first language is Chinese. Although there were many studies of second language (L2) writing in English, many of them were oriented towards product or process and were conducted in artificial settings. There have been relatively few situated studies of English L2 writing in higher education in the social contexts in which students undertake their writing tasks. This study seeks to address this primary question: How do nonnative-English-speaking (NNES) business undergraduates in Hong Kong undertake the assessed writing tasks of their disciplinary courses? \ud Case study was used to examine two NNES undergraduate students undertaking their assessed writing tasks in a Hong Kong university. Data were collected over a period of two years and from multiple sources: text-based interviews, participant diaries, and documents (texts produced by the participants, course documents and source materials). Inductive analysis was employed to make sense of the data. Specifically, data were organised, coded, categorised and integrated. \ud The results revealed that the processes through which the participants accomplished their disciplinary writing tasks were complex and influenced in various ways by the contexts in which the writing took place. Task specifications for the assigned tasks, mostly done in groups, were often not clearly stated. This gave rise to the employment of different strategies by students to represent the tasks, guess readers‘ expectations and interact with group mates to achieve their purposes. They also relied heavily on the Web as information sources to complete their tasks, which gave rise to problems such as textual borrowing. The thesis closes by exploring the pedagogical implications, which include the idea that English for Academic Purposes courses should move towards more discipline-specific to better help students cope with their disciplinary writing demands

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing.
  2. (1996). A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: clinical and experimental.
  3. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics.
  4. (1980). A look at basic writers in the process of composing.
  5. (2001). A narrow thinking system‖: Nonnative-English-Speaking students in group projects across the curriculum.
  6. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students‘ writing.
  7. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors.
  8. (1990). Academic writing course.
  9. (1997). Acquiring disciplinary literacy: a social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of education.
  10. (1994). An ethnographic study of content-based language instruction in the context of an English for academic purposes program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  11. (2005). An inter-university, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes,
  12. (1985). An investigation into the organising and organisational features of published conference papers. MA dissertation,
  13. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In
  14. (1981). Analyzing revision.
  15. (1990). Analyzing topical structure in ESL essays: Not all topics are equal.
  16. (2005). Applied genre analysis: cases in business and law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  17. (2007). Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: an intraview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article.
  18. (1985). Aspects of Article Introductions
  19. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions.
  20. (1995). Assertions and alternatives: Helping ESL undergraduates extend their choice in academic writing.
  21. (1982). Attention to rhetorical form while composing in a second language. In
  22. (1981). Available at
  23. (1996). Borrowing others‘ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism.
  24. (1985). Carmen: A case study of an ESL writer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  25. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In
  26. (1994). Case studies. In
  27. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks,
  28. (1982). Cognition, context, and certainty.
  29. (1982). Cognitive processes in composing and comprehending discourse.
  30. (1987). Committee of Hong Kong n.d./2007. Joint University Programmes Admissions System: Facts & Figures. Online document. Available at Urzua,
  31. (1996). Comparing the effects of reading and writing on writing performance.
  32. (1993). Comparing writing process and product across two languages: a study of 6 Singaporean university student writers.
  33. (1997). Completely different worlds‖: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses.
  34. (1982). Composing and coherence: The writing of eleven pre-medical students.
  35. (1987). Composing in a second language. In
  36. (1990). Composing in English: first language effects. In
  37. (1992). Context, text, intertext: toward a constructivist semiotic of writing.
  38. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar.
  39. (2008). Contrasting views of business students‘ writing needs in an EFL environment. English for Specific Purposes,
  40. (1967). Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of composition.
  41. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric:
  42. (2004). Controversies in second language writing: dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction. Ann Arbor:
  43. (1995). Copying strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum.
  44. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language.
  45. (2006). Crossing the boundaries of genre studies: Commentaries by experts.
  46. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education.
  47. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks,
  48. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing.
  49. (1988). Discourse community: where writers, readers, and texts come together.
  50. (2001). Doing qualitative educational research.
  51. (2007). Educational research: an introduction.
  52. (2003). English across academic and professional communities: A study of EFL learners‘ needs at the Lebanese American University.
  53. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge:
  54. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An advanced resource book.
  55. (1993). Entering a disciplinary community: conceptual activities required to write for one introductory university course.
  56. (2002). Ethics of research in education. In
  57. (2003). Exploring six MBA students‘ summary writing by introspection.
  58. Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp.xv – xvi). Cambridge:
  59. (2004). Exploring the interactions of writing instruction and disciplinary practice: Pathways of four multilingual writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  60. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines.
  61. (1990). for the Study of Writing. Flower,
  62. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach.
  63. (2007). from Denzin,
  64. (1994). Genre analysis: an approach to text analysis for ESP.
  65. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc Dissertations.
  66. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge:
  67. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor:
  68. (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
  69. (1984). Genre as social action.
  70. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach.
  71. (2006). Hong Kong
  72. (1999). If you don‘t tell me, how can I know?‖: a case study of four international students learning to write the US way.
  73. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: how far should we go?
  74. (2005). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches.
  75. (1988). Introduction: four dimensions of social construction in written communication.
  76. (2001). Introduction. In
  77. (1995). L1 and L2 writer‘s strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing.
  78. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: an exploratory study of 16 Chinese ELF writers.
  79. (1964). Language and language learning: theory and practice.
  80. (1989). Language and power.
  81. (1964). Language teaching: a scientific approach.
  82. (2001). Learning English for academic and occupational purposes.
  83. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student‘s rhetorical development in college.
  84. (1985). Learning to write in the Social Sciences.
  85. (1996). Learning to write professionally: ―situated learning‖ and the transition from university to professional discourse.
  86. (1995). Local interactions: constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program.
  87. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks,
  88. (1990). Managing the complexity of revising across languages.
  89. (2007). Marketing: An introduction. NJ: Pearson Education Atkinson,
  90. (2007). Marketing: The core.
  91. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
  92. (1985). Non-academic writing: the social perspective.
  93. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing.
  94. (1994). On diaries and diary keeping. In
  95. (1984). On the use of verbal reports in reading research.
  96. (1994). Once upon a time‖: the use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In
  97. (1996). Out of the woods: emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. In B. Leeds (Ed.), Writing in a second language
  98. (1978). Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In
  99. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong.
  100. (2007). Principles and practice of marketing.
  101. (2006). Principles of marketing.
  102. (2002). Problem-solving and EAP: themes and issues in a collaborative teaching venture. English for Specific Purposes.
  103. (1985). Problems with monitor use in second language composition. In
  104. (1998). Process writing. In
  105. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data.
  106. (1994). Qualitative data analysis.
  107. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.
  108. (1966). Quantity before quality in second language composition.
  109. (1994). Redefining ―context‖ in research on writing.
  110. (1995). Redefining the task: an ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In
  111. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge:
  112. (2000). Research methods in education.
  113. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge:
  114. (1994). Research methods.
  115. (2003). Research on second language writing: an overview of what we investigate and how. In
  116. (1996). Researching moving targets: using diaries to explore supply teachers‘ lives. In
  117. (1986). Retrospective accounts of language and learning processes.
  118. (1986). Revising in Spanish and English as a second language: A process oriented study of composition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  119. (1987). Revision strategies in L1 and L2 writing tasks: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  120. (1986). Rhetorical communities, the international student, and basic writing.
  121. (1991). Science research students‘ composing process.
  122. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In
  123. (1960). second language composition teaching at the intermediate level.
  124. (1984). Showing writing: Modelling the process.
  125. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:
  126. (1991). Social context and socially constructed texts: the initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. In
  127. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses.
  128. (1987). Social process in education: a reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In
  129. (2002). Specificity revisited: how far should we go now?
  130. (1998). Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival.
  131. (1994). Stimulated recall in research on writing: an antidote to ‗I don‘t know, it was fine‘. In
  132. (1962). Structural linguistics and systematic composition teaching to students of English as a second language.
  133. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach.
  134. (2004). Students‘ perceived difficulties in learning and their implications for learning to learn. In
  135. (1994). Students‘ perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines.
  136. (2004). Task representation of a Japanese L2 writer and its impact on usage of source text information.
  137. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor:
  138. (2002). Teaching and researching writing.
  139. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
  140. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing.
  141. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: a longitudinal case study.
  142. (2004). The art and science of marketing: Marketing for marketing managers.
  143. (1995). The art of case study research.
  144. (1993). The case of explicit teaching: Why what you don‘t know won‘t help you.
  145. (1994). The complex contexts of plagiarism: A reply to Deckert.
  146. (1998). The composing process of three Southeast Asian writers at the postsecondary level: An exploratory study.
  147. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies:
  148. (1971). The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders.
  149. (2006). The essence of marketing.
  150. (1989). The ethics of educational research.
  151. (2001). The ethics of social research. In
  152. (2007). The foreign language writer‘s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes.
  153. (2003). The foundations of qualitative research. In
  154. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: selected essays.
  155. (1993). The library revisited: exploring students‘ research processes. In A. Penrose & B. Sitcoe (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: cognitive research in the college writing classroom.
  156. (1976). The Nature and scope of marketing.
  157. (1989). The plagiario and the professor in our regular institution.
  158. (2007). The practice of social research.
  159. (1988). The presence of thought: introspective accounts of reading and writing.
  160. (1964). The psychologist and the foreign language teacher.
  161. (1987). The psychology of written composition.
  162. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions.
  163. (1987). The role of task representation in reading to write.
  164. (1990). The role of task representation in reading-to-write. In
  165. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes.
  166. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In
  167. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: A study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language.
  168. (1997). The witch doctors.
  169. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill
  170. (1990). This was an easy assignment: examining how students interpret academic writing tasks.
  171. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation (Monograph 8). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
  172. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes.
  173. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications.
  174. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure.
  175. (2004). Tracing process: how texts come into being. In
  176. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks:
  177. (1990). Translating context into action. In
  178. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  179. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition.
  180. (2002). Using diaries in research. In
  181. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of U.S. humanists and scientists.
  182. (1996). Verbal reports of Japanese novices‘ research writing practices in English.
  183. (2002). What do we mean by educational research?
  184. (1986). What professors actually require: academic tasks for the ESL classroom.
  185. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: a classroom study of composing.
  186. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: a survey of Hong Kong tertiary students.
  187. (1988). Why triangulation?
  188. (1984). Writer’s block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale:
  189. (1999). Writing as academic literacies: understanding textual practices in higher education.
  190. (2007). Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require?
  191. (1999). Writing business: genres, media and discourses.
  192. (1995). Writing from sources: Case studies of graduate students in business management.
  193. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  194. (2004). Writing in business courses: an analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific Purposes,
  195. (1990). Writing with others‘ words. In
  196. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and applications.
  197. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning:
  198. (1998). Writing/ disciplinarity: a sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.