Location of Repository

Non-monotonic welfare dynamics in a model of sustained income growth

By Dimitrios Varvarigos


In an overlapping generations economy with endogenous income growth, I combine themes from the work of Cooper et al. (2001), Kapur (2005), and Eaton and Eswaran (2009) in order to provide an example of an economy whose welfare dynamics are non-monotonic. Particularly, the evolution of workers’ welfare can be distinguished between two different regimes that arise naturally during the process of economic development. At relatively early stages, status concerns are inactive and welfare increases following the rising consumption of normal goods. During the later stages, however, workers engage in some type of status competition that does not allow consumption to improve well-being: their welfare actually declines as successive generations of workers increase their labour effort at the expense of leisure

Topics: Welfare, Economic growth, Positional goods, Leisure
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7629

Suggested articles



  1. (2006). Britain’s happiness in decline”, article by Mark Easton (the article can be accessed electronically at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/happiness_formula/4771908.stm)
  2. (2005). Can faster income growth reduce well being?”, doi
  3. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence” doi
  4. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory, doi
  5. (2005). Feeding the illusion of growth and happiness: a reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven”, doi
  6. (1998). Growth and the relativity of satisfaction”, doi
  7. (1998). Is more always better? A survey on positional concerns”, doi
  8. (2000). Luxury Fever: Money and Happiness in an Era of Excess, doi
  9. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being”, doi
  10. (2008). Preferences for status: evidence and economic implications”, Johnson School research paper no. #05-09,
  11. (2008). Relative deprivation, wealth inequality and economic growth”, doi
  12. (1977). Social Limits to Growth, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, doi
  13. (1999). Squeezed for time: American inequality and the shortage of leisure”, doi
  14. (2001). Status effects and negative utility growth”, doi
  15. (2009). The GDP paradox”, doi
  16. (1992). The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline in Leisure, Basic Books, doi
  17. (1962). The production function in allocation and growth: a synthesis”,
  18. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited: growing national income does go with greater happiness”,
  19. (2009). Well-being and affluence in the presence of a Veblen good”, doi
  20. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA”, doi
  21. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research?”, doi
  22. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?”, doi
  23. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.