Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Financial liberalisation and political variables: a response to Abiad and Mody

By Brian Burgoon, Panicos O. Demetriades and Geoffrey Underhill


We challenge recent findings by Abiad and Mody (2005) which suggest that financial liberalization has little to do with political variables. This analysis is at odds with some of the established literature, and only with difficulty comes to terms with the considerable cross-national variation in the pace, phasing, and extent of financial reforms over time. Using Abiad and Mody’s own index of financial liberalization, but slightly unbundling and refining their measures of ‘ideological affinity’and ‘regime type’, we examine what Abiad and Mody call the ‘triggers’of liberalisation and the dynamics of the subsequent ‘cumulative transformation’. We demonstrate the role of political variables in relation to initial liberalisation episodes, and as variables affecting the cumulative dynamics and sustainability of ongoing financial reform processes, including those which affect the acceptability and costs of liberalization. These factors include (i) shifts to – as opposed to levels in – Left government; (ii) the incidence of Left governments combined with low levels of democracy; (iii) international voter support for free markets; (iv) the extent of social safety nets; (v) the presence of multilateral and bilateral aid programs. Our empirical investigation confirms these factors as statistically significant determinants of financial liberalization, and reveal what Abiad and Mody identify as ‘learning’ to be a highly political process

Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). Financial Reform: what shakes it? what shapes it?” doi
  2. (1999). Financial Liberalization: The Experience of Developing Countries”, doi
  3. (1998). The Capital Myth: the difference between trade in widgets and dollars,” doi
  4. (1999). Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hundred Years Ago?” doi
  5. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences:Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments,
  6. (2001). Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that doi
  7. (2006). Globalization is what Parties Make of it: welfare and protectionism in party platforms” Garnet Working Paper no.
  8. (1996). Financial Services, Globalisation, and Domestic Policy Change: a comparative study of North America and the European doi
  9. (2000). The Causes of doi
  10. (1993). What Do We Know about the Political doi
  11. (2005). Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD, doi
  12. (1994). States and the Re-emergence of Global Finance: from Bretton Woods to the 1990s, doi
  13. (1993). Political economy of policy reform in developing countries. doi
  14. (1990). The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution, doi
  15. (1997). Has Globalization Gone Too Far? doi
  16. (1997). The Origins of Financial Openness: doi
  17. (2007). Ideology and Voter Preferences as Determinants of Financial Globalization,” doi
  18. (2003). International Financial Governance under Stress, Cambridge: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.