Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Nowcasting, business cycle dating and the interpretation of new information when real time data are available

By Kevin Lee, Nilss Olekalns and Kalvinder K. Shields

Abstract

A canonical model is described which reflects the real time informational context of\ud decision-making. Comparisons are drawn with ‘conventional’ models that incorrectly omit\ud market-informed insights on future macroeconomic conditions and inappropriately incorporate\ud information that was not available at the time. It is argued that conventional\ud models are misspecified and misinterpret news. However, neither diagnostic tests applied\ud to the conventional models nor typical impulse response analysis will be able to expose\ud these deficiencies clearly. This is demonstrated through an analysis of quarterly US data\ud 1968q4-2006q1. However, estimated real time models considerably improve out-of-sample\ud forecasting performance, provide more accurate ‘nowcasts’ of the current state of the\ud macroeconomy and provide more timely indicators of the business cycle. The point is illustrated\ud through an analysis of the US recessions of 1990q3—1991q2 and 2001q1—2001q

Topics: Structural Modelling, Real Time Data, Nowcasting, Business Cycles
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7491

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003b), “Forecast Uncertainty in Macroeconometric Modelling: An Application to the UK Economy”, doi
  2. (1995). Alternative Procedures for Converting Qualitative Response Data to Quantitative Expectations: An Application to Australian Manufacturing”, doi
  3. (1998). Bayesian Methods for Dynamic Multivariate Models”, doi
  4. (1995). Comparing Predictive Accuracy”, doi
  5. (2003). Disagreement about Inflation Expectations”, doi
  6. (1993). Do Recessions Permanently Change Output?” doi
  7. (2000). Errors in the Measurement of the Output Gap and the Design of Monetary Policy”, doi
  8. (2000). Expectations Formation and Business Cycle Fluctuations; An Empirical Analysis of Actual and Expected Output doi
  9. (1994). Formation of Price and Cost Inflation Expectations in British Manufacturing Industries: A Multisectoral Analysis, doi
  10. (2006). Global and National Macroeconometric Modelling: A Long-Run Structural Approach, doi
  11. (2002). Imperfect Knowledge, Inflation Expectations and Monetary Policy, doi
  12. (1996). Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models,” doi
  13. (2005). Information in Economic Forecasting”, doi
  14. (1999). Interest Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price Model”, doi
  15. (2001). Learning and Expectations in Economics, doi
  16. (2007). Macroeconomic Modelling for Monetary Policy Evaluation”, doi
  17. (2006). Macroeconomic Modelling with a Global Perspective”, doi
  18. (1998). Measuring Monetary Policy”, doi
  19. (2006). Modeling Data Revisions: Measurement Error and Dynamics of “True” Values”, doi
  20. (2001). Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Time Data”, doi
  21. (1999). Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and to What End?” doi
  22. (1995). New Keynesian Economics and the Phillips curve”, doi
  23. (1983). News or Noise: An Analysis of GNP Revisions”, doi
  24. (2000). On the Derivation of Monetary Policy Shocks: Should We Throw the VAR Out with the Bath Water?”, doi
  25. (1986). Quantitative versus Qualitative Measures of Inflation Expectations”, doi
  26. (2008). Real Time Representations of the Output Gap”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, doi
  27. (2001). Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy and Encompassing for Nested Models”, doi
  28. (2005). The conquest of US inflation: Learning and Robustness to Model Uuncertainty”, doi
  29. (1995). The Econometric Analysis of Calibrated Macroeconomic Models,” Chapter 7 in Handbook of Applied Econometrics: Macroeconomics. edited by M.H. Pesaran
  30. (2006). The Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator: Some Practical Issues”,
  31. (2008). The Yield Curve as a Predictor of Growth: Long-Run Evidence, 1875—1997”, The Review of Economics and doi
  32. (1994). Time Series Analysis, doi
  33. (1997). What Central Bankers Could Learn from Academics - And Vice-Versa”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.