Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Implementation of a high-order finite difference scheme to model wave propagation

By Aldo Rona and Ivan Spisso


This paper was published as Proceedings of the 13th CEAS/AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Rome, Italy, 21-23 May 2007, pp. 1-8. It is also available from large disparity between the time and length scales of an acoustically active flow\ud field, and the ones of the resulting generated acoustic field, is an issue in computational\ud aeroacoustics (CAA). Numerical schemes used to calculate the time and space derivatives\ud in CAA should exhibit a low dispersion and dissipation error. This paper presents the\ud implementation of a high-order finite difference scheme to model CAA problems. The\ud numerical scheme consists of a sixth-order prefactored compact scheme coupled with the\ud 4-6 Low Dispersion and Dissipation Runge-Kutta (LDDRK) time marching scheme. One-\ud sided explicit boundary stencils are implemented and a buffer zone is used to eliminate\ud spurious numerical waves. Results are in good agreement with a 1-D advection equation\ud benchmark problem. This constitutes a preliminary validation for the scheme to explore\ud and investigate the acoustic propagation of sound generated aerodynamically

Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). A New Class of
  2. (2003). A numerical method for computation of sound radiation from an unflanged duct,” doi
  3. (1996). AIAA paper,
  4. (2000). Compact Implicit MacCormack-Type Schemes with High Accuracy,” doi
  5. (1993). Dispersion-Relation-Preserving finite difference schemes for
  6. (2004). editors, An overview of high-order finite difference schemes for computational aeroacoustics,
  7. (1994). Finite difference schemes for long-time integration,” doi
  8. (1996). Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computa7 of 8 doi
  9. (1996). On Increasing the accuracy of MacCormack schemes for Aeroacoustic Applications,” Nasa Contract Report
  10. (2003). Optimized prefactored compact schemes,” doi
  11. (2004). Review of computational aeroacoustics algorithms,” doi
  12. (1993). Stable and accurate boundary treatments for compact, high-order finite-difference schemes,” doi
  13. (1994). Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systemes: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes,” doi
  14. (2006). Towards quieter airframe,” Aeronautics Days

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.