Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Online Scheduling with Partial Job Values: Does Timesharing or Randomization Help?

By F. Y. L. Chin and S. P. Y. Fung

Abstract

We study the following online preemptive scheduling problem: given a set of jobs with release\ud times, deadlines, processing times and weights, schedule them so as to maximize the total value obtained. Unlike\ud traditional scheduling problems, partially completed jobs can get partial values proportional to their amounts\ud processed. Recently Chrobak et al. gave improved lower and upper bounds [1.236, 1.8] on the competitive\ud ratio for this problem, the upper bound being achieved by using timesharing to simulate two equal-speed\ud processors. In this paper we (1) give a new algorithm MIXED-k with competitive ratio 1/(1 − (k/(k + 1))k )\ud which approaches e/(e−1) ≈ 1.582 when k → ∞, by using timesharing to simulate k equal-speed processors;\ud (2) give an equivalent but much more practical algorithm MIX, which is e/(e − 1)-competitive (independent\ud of k), by timesharing the processor with different speeds (depending on the job weights), and use its interesting\ud properties to devise an efficient implementation; (3) improve the lower bound to 1.25 by showing an identical\ud lower bound for randomized algorithms; and (4) prove a lower bound of 1.618 on the competitive ratio when\ud timesharing is not allowed, thus answering an open problem raised by Chang and Yap, showing that timesharing\ud provably helps in giving better algorithms for this problem

Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s00453-003-1025-6
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/1820
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/2381/182... (external link)
  • http://link.springer.com/artic... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.