Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A Qualitative Analysis of factors influencing Staff Beliefs about the Challenging Behaviour exhibited by Adults with a Learning Disability.

By Sarah Jane Andrews


Purpose: To review the literature on staff attributions of challenging behaviour (CB) exhibited by adults with a learning disability (LD). In particular, those studies which utilise Weiner’s (1986) attribution model.\ud Method: The review examined studies which contribute to understanding how staff understand and respond to CB exhibited by adults with LD. Studies were seen to do so in one of two ways. Firstly, by examining factors that influence staff attributions of CB. Secondly, by examining the effect of training programmes on staff attributions of CB.\ud Results: Studies using Weiner’s (1986) attribution model to examine staffs causal beliefs about CB exhibited by adults with LD highlighted the influence of particular cognitive and emotional factors. Variables specific to both the member of staff and the clients that can be seen to influence staff attributions of CB were also highlighted. Studies examining the impact of training on staff attributions of CB exhibited by adults with LD have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the efficiency of staff training on CB. The evidence provided by these studies suggests the utility of the attribution model is disputable. Problems with the validity and reliability of the methods such studies use are highlighted, and alternative approaches are noted.\ud Conclusions: The review highlighted the need for future research in the field to adopt alternative models to understand staff beliefs about CB, as the utility of Weiner’s (1986) model is questionable. It also draws attention to the need to consider alternative methods of enquiry as the validity of single-scale measures in assessing staff attributions is questionable

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1960). A Case-Study in the Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence against Anxiety: A Report on a Study of the Nursing Service of a General Hospital. doi
  2. (2007). A Communication Training programme for residential staff working with adults with challenging behaviour: Pilot data on intervention effects. doi
  3. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. doi
  4. (2008). Attribution Theory Applied to Helping Behaviour Towards People with Intellectual Disabilities Who Challenge. doi
  5. (1999). Attributions in Action: A practical Approach to Coding Qualitative Data.
  6. (1999). Attributions in Action.
  7. (2004). Behavioural and cognitive behavioural interventions for outwardly-directed aggressive behaviour in people with learning disabilities. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, doi
  8. (2003). Brief Report: Experimental effects of manipulating attributional information about challenging behaviour. doi
  9. (2006). Care staff attributions about challenging behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities. doi
  10. (2007). Care staff attributions toward selfinjurious behaviour exhibited by adults with intellectual disabilities. doi
  11. (2000). Carers’ attributions for challenging behaviour. doi
  12. (2006). Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: The relationship between expressed emotion and staff attributions. doi
  13. (2001). Cognitive emotional reactions of care staff to difficult child behaviour. doi
  14. (1992). Differential effects of severe self-injurious behaviour on the behaviour of others. doi
  15. (1990). Explanations by professional care staff, optimism, and helping behaviour: an application of attribution theory. doi
  16. (1994). Fragmentation and integration in a school for physically handicapped children. In A. Obholzer & V.Z. Roberts (Eds) The unconscious at work: Individual and organisational stress in the human services (pp 84-94). doi
  17. (1972). Fundamentals of Experimental Design: 2nd Edition. Allyn and
  18. (2002). Helping, attributions, emotions and coping style in response to people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour. doi
  19. (2007). Impact of a 3-day training course on challenging behaviour on staff cognitive and emotional responses. doi
  20. (2007). Impact of extended education/training in positive behaviour support on staff knowledge, causal attributions and emotional responses. doi
  21. (2005). Knowing you: the interpersonal perceptions of staff towards aggressive individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities in situations of conflict. doi
  22. (1998). Learning disability care staff emotional reactions to aggressive challenging behaviours: Development of a measurement tool. doi
  23. (1988). Leeds Attributional Coding System doi
  24. (1994). Maintaining local residential placements. In: doi
  25. (2001). Managing challenging behaviour in the community: methods and results of interactive staff training. doi
  26. (2004). Negative Emotional Reactions to Challenging Behaviour and Staff Burnout: Two Replication Studies. doi
  27. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies, doi
  28. (1995). On attribution theory: challenging behaviour and staff beliefs.
  29. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. doi
  30. (2002). Responses of staff towards people with mild to moderate intellectual disability who behave aggressively: a cognitive emotional analysis. doi
  31. (1996). Self-injurious behaviour and people with intellectual disabilities: assessing the behavioural knowledge and causal explanations of care staff. doi
  32. (1995). Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative analysis. In doi
  33. (2007). Service User Outcomes of staff Training in Positive Behavioural Support Using Person Focused Training: A control Group study. doi
  34. (1994). Severe Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours: Designing High Quality Services. doi
  35. (2002). Staff attributions about the causes of challenging behaviours: Effects of longitudinal training in multi-element behaviour support. doi
  36. (2005). Staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities: doi
  37. (2005). Staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities: the impact of stress on attributions of challenging behaviour. doi
  38. (2003). Staff reactions to self-injurious behaviours in learning disability services: Attributions, emotional responses and helping. doi
  39. (2007). Staff Training and Challenging Behaviour. doi
  40. (2007). Staff training in Positive Behaviour Support: Impact on attitudes and knowledge. doi
  41. (2003). Staff who Work with People who have Intellectual Disabilities: The Importance of Personality. doi
  42. (1995). Stress and residential staff: towards an integration of existing research. doi
  43. (1998). Template Analysis. In
  44. (1985). The development of the self in children in institutions. In doi
  45. (2005). The dilemmas of residential care staff working with the challenging behaviour of people with learning disabilities. doi
  46. (1997). The HARC Challenging Behaviour Project. doi
  47. (2002). The impact of service user cognitive level on carer attributions for aggressive behaviour. doi
  48. (2002). The impact of training and staff attributions on staff practice in learning disability services: A pilot study. doi
  49. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. doi
  50. (1999). The relationship between staff sickness levels and client assault levels in a health service Rose, doi
  51. (1994). The self-assigned impossible task. In A. Obholzer & V.Z. Roberts (Eds) The unconscious at work: Individual and organisational stress in the human services (pp 110-120). doi
  52. (2005). The Use of Physical Interventions with People with Intellectual Disabilities and Challenging Behaviour – the Experiences of Service Users and Staff Members. doi
  53. (1993). Training clinical practitioners. In:
  54. URL: Date of retrieval:
  55. (2006). What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a Comprehensive approach to Judging Rigour / Quality. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.