Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Impact of E-learning Implementation on the Management of Private Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia: A Case Study.

By Ratna Malar Selvaratnam

Abstract

E-learning is a force to be reckoned with in education, where lifelong learning is taking on a significant presence now. As with all educational institutions, Private Higher Educational Institutions (PHEIs) too need to consider adapting and embracing e-learning with greater success and efficiency to compete in the marketplace. In investigating the extent of impact of e-learning on management structures of PHEIs in Malaysia, this research can potentially set the course for other institutions of higher learning in Malaysia to be able to successfully introduce and proceed with e-learning in their education agenda. For successful e-learning implementation, though, it is argued that the four factors which need to be addressed are Rosenberg's 4 Cs: the presence of an e-learning champion, the management of change (to include e-learning in the organisation), effective communication, and the organisation's culture, especially of learning. These affect the way e-learning is implemented. Furthermore, both e-learning and its arms of change have an influence on an institution of learning. The methodology used in this research is the case study, with a three-pronged data collection format. The questionnaire was chosen to track the trend of practice and awareness, the interview to get a greater depth of understanding on the issues, and finally, documents and records to illustrate the current state of e-learning and management culture within the organization. It was found from the results of this research that e-learning implementation requires a democratic, devolved approach to holistic change. Much of the strengths and weaknesses of PHEI management structures are brought out to the open with the adoption of c-learning. A flatter organizational structure would help cope with the demands of technological inclusion and national needs within the private education setting in Malaysia. However, it is emphasized here that e-learning implementation requires a management of the transition in PHEIs that may bring about the redefinition of the identity of the institution itself

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/4435

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). A Design Document for E-Learning Agenda for USM',
  2. (2000). Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives',
  3. (2003). Adult and Distance Education Management: An Application of the Metaphor "Organizations as Organisms"',
  4. (1999). An Overview doi
  5. (1994). Anticipating Tomorrow: Technology and the Future', Framing Technology: Society,
  6. (2001). Are We Heading in the Right Direction? ',
  7. (1968). Bases of Social Power', Group Dynamics: Research and Theory,
  8. (1991). Borderless Education through E-learning', Multimedia University, Retrieved 27/11/03 http: //mmismelaka.
  9. (2001). Challenges and strategies for Improving the Quality of Information in a University Setting: a Case Study', doi
  10. (1993). Change Forces, doi
  11. (1999). Change Matters, doi
  12. (1997). Colleges: An Organizational Metaphor',
  13. (2002). Collegiate Chronicle, Sunway College, Anniversary Issue
  14. (1997). Concluding Remarks: Dilemmas Of Educational Policy In Malaysia',
  15. (1998). Content Design Frameworks For Internet Studies Curricula And Research', doi
  16. (1996). Creating Contexts Of Change: The Malaysian Experience', 8`! '
  17. (1994). Cultures and Organizations: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival,
  18. (1992). Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide,
  19. (1999). Designing for Cultural Diversity in an IT and Globalizing Milieu', doi
  20. (2000). Designing the Learning-Centered School,
  21. (2002). Designing World-Class E-Learning,
  22. (1993). Doing Your Research Project, doi
  23. (2003). E-Learning and Teacher Development: Communication, Collaboration and Reflection', International Symposium for E-Learning,
  24. (2003). E-Learning in the 215 doi
  25. (2001). E-Learning: "If We Build It, Will They Come? ",
  26. (2000). E-Learning: From Institutions to providers, from Students to Learners, The "E" is for Eveiytliing,
  27. (2001). Editorial: The Challenge of Educational Technology',
  28. (2002). Education and Nation Formation in Malaysia: A Structural Analysis, Kuala Lumpur,
  29. (1996). Education Dualism in Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur,
  30. (2003). Education for Managing ICT: Professional Development for School Leaders' in:
  31. (1999). Education in Malaysia: Towards Vision doi
  32. (2001). Educational Administration doi
  33. (1997). Educational Change: Facing the Challenges of the Coming Decades',
  34. (1999). Electronic conferencing: promoting a collaborative community with learning opportunities for developing teachers', Retrieved 13/2/04 http: //NvNvxv.
  35. (2002). Establishing Successful Online Distance Learning Environments: Distinguishing Factors that Contribute to Online Courses and Programs', doi
  36. (1951). Field Theory In Social Science. doi
  37. (2001). Flexible Learning in a Digital World, doi
  38. (2003). Globalization and Higher Education Restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China', doi
  39. (2001). Globalization, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurial ism in Universities: Is the Local Dimension Still Important? ', doi
  40. (2000). Going Against the National Cultural Grain: A Longitudinal Case Study of Organizational Culture Change in Turkish Higher Education', doi
  41. (1947). Group Decision and Social Change', Readings in Social Psychology, doi
  42. (2000). Home Schooling: An Emerging Research Agenda',
  43. (2003). How to Make Your E-Learning Initiative Succeed', Learning & Training Innovations, August 6`h http: //x"v-v.
  44. (2000). How to Teach and Train Online,
  45. (2001). Human Resource Booklet, Subang Jaya, Sunway College Sunway Group,
  46. (2003). ICT Implementation and School Leadership: Case Studies of ICT Integration in Teaching and Learning', doi
  47. (2001). ICT. " Changing Education,
  48. (1996). Implementing Public Policy In Educational Bureaucratic Setting',
  49. (1995). Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation, doi
  50. (1990). Inside Organizations, doi
  51. (1999). Interviewing for Social Scientists, doi
  52. (2001). Into Knowledge, Retrieved 1/9/2001 http: //www. purpletrain. com/
  53. (1999). Introduction', Educational Documentation, Research
  54. (2001). Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional development: a critical review of the literature'
  55. (1996). Kurt Lewin's Change Theory in the Field and in the Classroom: Notes toward a Model of Managed Learning', doi
  56. (1996). Leadership And Culture Conceptual And Methodological Issues In Comparing Models Across Cultural Settings', doi
  57. (2002). Leveraging Distance Education Through the Internet: A Paradigm Shift in Higher Education', doi
  58. (2001). Managerial Effectiveness for a new Millenium in the Global Higher Education Sector', doi
  59. (1993). Managing Change in Schools, Buckingham,
  60. (2001). Managing in the Malaysian Context', Management
  61. (2003). Managing Staff Development for Online Education: A Situated Learning Model', doi
  62. (2000). Managing Technological Change,
  63. (2003). Managing Technology Integration into Schools: A South African Perspective', doi
  64. (2001). Managing the Transformation to an E-Learning Organization',
  65. (1997). Mastering the Infinite Gante,
  66. (1997). Mixed Method Evaluation: A Case Study', doi
  67. (1999). More On Myth, Magic And Metaphor: Cultural Insights Into The Management Of Information Technology In Organizations', doi
  68. (1996). Nerv Paradigms For Change? Theories Of Organization And The Organization Of Theories', doi
  69. (2003). Nerv Technologies and Educative Leadership', doi
  70. (1994). Organizational Structure and Culture',
  71. (2001). People Skills: Change Management Tools- Lewin's Change Model', doi
  72. (2003). Phrase Completions: An Alternative to Likert Scales', doi
  73. (2000). Planning for IT in Higher Education: It's Not and Oxymoron',
  74. (1996). Preliminary Explorations of Indigenous Perspectives of Educational Management' doi
  75. (2000). Preparing Your Campus for E-Business', The "E" is foi" Everything,
  76. (2000). Preparing Your Campus for E-Business', The "E" is for Everything,
  77. (1986). Public and Private Sectors in Higher Education: Structure, Function and Change in Eight Countries, Ann Arbor, doi
  78. (1996). Qualitative Research Design, doi
  79. (1998). Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology, doi
  80. (1992). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude, doi
  81. (1994). Research Tools',
  82. (1993). School Based Management and Linkage with the Curriculum', School Based Management and School Effectiveness, doi
  83. (1993). Sculpting the Learning Organization, doi
  84. (1994). Strategy, Policy and Planning',
  85. (2000). The Academy as Learning Community', Leading Academic Change,
  86. (1990). The Age of Unreason, doi
  87. (1997). The Challenges of Malaysian Education In The 215` Century'
  88. (1999). The Changing Face of Transnational Education: Moving Education- Not Learners',
  89. (1999). The Corporate Culture Survival Guide, doi
  90. (1994). The Fifth Discipline, doi
  91. (1986). The Financial Crisis in Australian Higher Education and the Inexorable Push Towards Privatisation, '
  92. (2000). The Impacts Of Globalization On Education in Malaysia',
  93. (2003). The Issues and Strategies of Elearning',
  94. (1992). The Knowledge Company: Strategy Formulation in Knowledge Intensive Industries'.
  95. (1996). The Privatisation of Higher Education',
  96. (1997). The Privatisation of Malaysia Higher Education: A Cost Benefit Analysis Stakeholders, Agenda Setting', Educational Challenges in
  97. (1997). The Role Of The Private Sector In doi
  98. (2002). The Role of the University Head of Department', doi
  99. (2001). The Transformation of Malaysian Society Through Technological Advantage: ICT and Education in Malaysia',
  100. (1974). The University: An Organisational Choice Under Ambiguity,
  101. (1997). The Virtual Campus: Technology and Reform in Higher Education',
  102. (1989). Towards a Conceptual Framework for Mixed Method Evaluation Designs', Educational Evaluation and policy Analysis, doi
  103. (2001). Towards Institutional-Wide Online Teaching and Learning Systems: Trends, Drivers and Issues',
  104. (1999). Towards More Adaptive Universities: Trends of Institutional Reform in Europe', doi
  105. (2001). Transitional Issues in e-Education: Re-engineering Organisational Culture, Kuala Lumpur,
  106. (2001). Understanding and Facilitating Organizational Change in the 21St Centtay,
  107. (1986). Understanding Schools as Organizations,
  108. (1997). Vision and Mission of Universiti Malaysia Sarawak: A Commitment to Excellence and Relevance',
  109. (2000). What Campus Leaders Can Do Today', Preparing Your Campus for a Networked Future,
  110. (2000). What changes has e-learning made to your work so far? 20. Any further comments? Bibliography Bates,
  111. (1999). What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in their classrooms? ' paper presented at the
  112. (2000). What Keeps Universities from Embracing e-Learning', Learning and Training Innovations, http: //%v vw. Itimagazine. com

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.