Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Cointegration Analysis-Causality Testing and Wagner's Law: The Case of Turkey, 1950-1990.

By Safa Demirbas


This paper investigates statistically the existence of a long-run relationship between public expenditure and GNP (Wagner’s Law) using data for Turkey over the period 1950-1990. Recent advances in time series analysis have permitted the investigation of the long-run relationship between public expenditure and GNP in terms of cointegration analysis. In the case of Wagner’s Law, evidence of cointegration is sufficient to establish a long-run relationship between public expenditure and income. However, to support Wagner’s Law would require unidirectional causality from income to public expenditure. Therefore cointegration should be seen as a necessary condition for Wagner’s Law, but not sufficient. Hence, conditional on cointegration results, it is necessary to look at the causality properties of the model(s). Using the Engle and Granger cointegration test, the Granger Causality test and Turkish time series aggregate data for the period 1950-1990, we find no empirical support for Wagner’s Law

Topics: Wagner's Law, Public Expenditure Growth, Unit Root Test, Cointegration Analysis, Causality
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester.
Year: 1999
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1991). A Primer on Cointegration with An Application to M oney and Income”, Review Federal Reserve Bank of ST.
  2. (1992). An Economic Analysis of Swedish Government Expenditure. doi
  3. (1979). Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth", doi
  4. (1986). Causality Between Income and Government Expenditure: doi
  5. (1958). Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: M acmillan. doi
  6. (1987). Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, doi
  7. (1992). Co-Integration: An Introductory Survey”,
  8. (1992). Cointegration and Dynamic Time Series doi
  9. (1990). Cointegration and Error-Correction M odels: The Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending”, doi
  10. (1990). Cointegration in Small Samples: Empirical Percentiles, Drifting M oments, and Customised Testing”,
  11. (1994). Cointegration, Causality and W agner’s Law: A Test for doi
  12. (1993). Cointegration, Error Correction and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. doi
  13. (1994). Cointegration, Error Correction M odels: The Temporal Causality between doi
  14. (1991). Cointegration: An Introduction to the Literature”, doi
  15. (1983). Comparing Alternative Tests of Causality in Temporal Systems”, doi
  16. (1990). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests. UC San Diego Discussion Paper,
  17. (1991). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests",
  18. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, doi
  19. (1993). Dollar M ovements and Inflation: a Cointegration Analysis",
  20. (1993). Estimating Long-Run Relationships in Economics: A Comparison of Different Approaches", doi
  21. (1993). Export Growth and Economic Growth: An Application of Cointegration and Error Correction M odelling",
  22. (1969). Fiscal Systems. New Haven and London:
  23. (1974). Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: doi
  24. (1993). Further Evidence of W agner’s Law for M exico: An Application of Cointegration Analysis”,
  25. (1998). Guide to Econometrics. 3rd edition.
  26. (1993). Introductory Econometrics:Theory and Applications. 2nd edn.
  27. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric doi
  28. (1987). Kamu Kesiminin Büyümesi: Türkiye için Uygulamali Bir Çalisma (1963-1985). Unpublished PhD thesis.
  29. (1997). Keynes Versus W agner: Public Expenditure and National Income for Three African Countries”, doi
  30. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root", doi
  31. (1991). Long-Run Economic Relationships: Reading in Cointegration. Oxford: doi
  32. (1989). M acroeconomic M odelling. Amsterdam (The Netherlands):
  33. (1992). M odelling the Relationship Between Output and Government Expenditures in Canada”,
  34. (1992). New Directions in Econometric Practice. doi
  35. (1968). On the Empirical Testing of W agner's Law:
  36. (1967). Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Time Series Analysis",Public Finance,
  37. (1993). Public Expenditure Growth in Greece and Portugal: W agner’s Law and Beyond", doi
  38. (1969). Public Expenditures in Communist and Capitalist Nations. London: George Allen and Unvin Ltd.
  39. (1982). Small Sample Properties of Three Tests for Granger-Causal Ordering in a Bivariate Stochastic System”, doi
  40. (1981). Some Properties of Time Series Data and Their use in Econometric M odel Specification”, doi
  41. (1985). State Planning Organisation (SPO)
  42. (1980). Testing for Causality”, doi
  43. (1997). Testing W agner's 'Law' Using Disaggregated Public Expenditure Data in the Case of Greece: 1958-93", doi
  44. (1996). The Allocation of Public Consumption Expenditure in the UK. doi
  45. (1974). The Case of Turkey: Government Expenditures, the Revenue Constraint, and W agner's Law", doi
  46. (1987). The Causal Factors of Government Expenditure doi
  47. (1975). The Growth of Public Expenditures: doi
  48. (1970). The Growth of Public Spending in Canada",
  49. (1993). The Growth of the Public Sector: Theories and International Evidence. Edward Elgar. doi
  50. (1976). The Politics of Public Expenditure: doi
  51. (1883). Three Extracts on Public Finance",
  52. (1082). Trends and Random W alks in M acroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications",
  53. (1993). Türkiye'de Bütçe Harcamalarinin Genel Bir Degerlendirmesi (1924-1993). Ankara: M aliye Bakanligi.
  54. (1974). Türkiye'de Kamu Harcamalarinin Seyri: 1927-1967. Istanbul: Fakülteler M atbaasi.
  55. (1984). Türkiye'de Kamu Harcamalarinin Seyri", in Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
  56. (1971). W agner's 'Law' of Expanding State Activity",
  57. (1987). W agner's Hypothesis in Time-Series and Cross-Section Perspectives: Evidence from 'Real' Data for 115 Countries", doi
  58. (1971). W agner's Law of Public Expenditure: Do Recent CrossSection Studies Confirm it?",
  59. (1979). W agner's Law of Public Expenditures: Some Efficient Results for the United States",
  60. (1985). W agner's Law: A Pooled Time Series Cross Section Comparison",
  61. (1980). W agner's Law: An Econometric Test for M exico, 1925-76",
  62. (1990). W agner’s ‘Law’ and the Developing Economy: A Time Series Evidence from Pakistan”,
  63. (1993). W agner’s Law: Is it A long Term Phenomenon?” W orking Paper.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.