Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Consumer Confidence in Online Cross-Border Business-to-Consumer Arbitration.

By Mutasim Ahmad Alqudah


The present thesis argues that the current legal framework regulating online cross-border business-to-consumer arbitration reduces the consumer confidence in online arbitration. The analysis focuses on the law applying to online cross-border business-to-consumer arbitration in England and on the U.S. Federal level, as these are identified as main emerging legal systems in this field. The main points in support of the above argument are as follows: First, the current rules do not oblige the business to notify the consumer about the existence of the arbitration clause in the B2C e-commerce contract. Second, the current choice of law rules applicable to online cross-border B2C arbitration do not ensure the consumer that he will enjoy the protection awarded to him under the law of his country of domicile. Third, the current jurisdiction rules applicable to online B2C arbitration do not give the consumer the right to litigate disputes related to online arbitration agreements and processes in the Courts of his country of domicile. Fourth, the current rules governing the online arbitral procedures do not promote the consumer perception of fairness. Finally, this thesis concludes that consumer confidence is essential for the success of this form of electronic dispute resolution, and that it can be increased by the adoption of an international convention which resolves all the above mentioned problems

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). (Netherlands) v Stolt Spur Inc.
  2. (1998). 1 Lloyd's Rep.
  3. (1996). 1 Lloyd's Rep. 380 Article 3(1),
  4. (1999). 12, The Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulat ions 2000, SI 2000/2334 12Andrew T. Guzman, ―Arb itrator Liab ility: Reconciling Arb itration and Mandatory Rules‖,
  5. (2005). 12Alejandro Lòpez Ort iz, ―Arb itration and IT‖,
  6. (1999). 15 Ohio St.
  7. (1999). 2 Lloyd's Rep.
  8. (2006). 2 Lloyd's Rep. 485 [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 379 §10, Federal Arbit ration Act
  9. 2d 332 (2000) §2A-106(2), Uniform Commercial Code. Principle IV, Recommendation
  10. (2002). 41Reporter‘s Comments on Principle 3, Consumer Due Process Protocol. Schellekens explained that online arbitrat ion services are offered by ODR
  11. (1922). 64 Cong.
  12. (2002). a Casebook on European Consumer Law, (Hart Publishing,
  13. (1986). A Consent Theory of Contract‖,
  14. (2004). A Consumer Dream or Pandora's Box: Is Arbitration a Viable Option for Cross-Border Consumer Disputes?‘‘,
  15. (2000). A New Way to Resolve International Business Disputes in Illinois‖,
  16. a Practical Approach to Arbitration Law,
  17. (1995). A Process Value Analysis of Decision-Maker Bias: The Case of Economic Conflicts of Interest‖,
  18. (2001). A Proposal for an Appellate Panel for the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy‘‘,
  19. (2002). Achieving Knowing and Voluntary Consent in Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration Agreements at the Contracting Stage of Employment‖,
  20. (2003). Adapting International Private Law Rules for Electronic Consumer Contracts‖, in
  21. (1996). ADR on the Internet‖,
  22. (1995). Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies v
  23. (1992). Alternative Dispute Resolution, (1st edn,
  24. (2002). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Online Arbitration and Mediation
  25. (2002). Amending the Federal Arbitration Act‖,
  26. (1985). An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine‖,
  27. (2003). An Introduction to the English Legal System, (2nd edn, OUP,
  28. (2003). Anders v Hometown Mortg. Services,
  29. (2005). Applicable Law and Electronic Consume Contracts: a European Perspective‖,
  30. (1997). Applicat ion of Online System in Alternate Dispute Resolution‖,
  31. (1997). Application of Online System in Alternate Dispute Resolution‖,
  32. (1988). Arb itration and Mediation: Synthesis or Antithesis?‖,
  33. (1995). Arb itration of Disputes between Consumers and Financial Institutions: A Serious Threat to Consumer Protection‖,
  34. (1983). Arbitral awards Economy Forms Corporation v Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran,
  35. (2004). Arbitrat ion Clauses, Jury-Waiver clauses, and Other Contractual Waivers of Constitutional Rights‖,
  36. (1984). Arbitration a Practical Guide, (1st edn,
  37. (1996). Arbitration Act
  38. (2003). Arbitration and Free Movement of Judgments‖,
  39. (2004). Arbitration Clauses, Jury-Waiver clauses, and Other Contractual Waivers of Constitutional Rights‖,
  40. (1995). Arbitration of Disputes between Consumers and Financial Institutions: A Serious Threat to Consumer Protection‖,
  41. (1997). Arbitration Practice and Procedure: Interlocutory and Hearing Problems, (2nd edn, LLP Publishing, London & Hong Kong,
  42. (1999). Arbitrator Liability: Reconciling Arbitration and Mandatory Rules‖,
  43. (2005). Article 17 ECD: Encouragement of Alternative Dispute Resolution On-line Dispute Resolution: A View from Scotland‖, in Lilian Edwards (eds), The New Legal Framework for E-Commerce in Europe,
  44. (1999). Autonomy in International Contracts, (1st edn,
  45. (2004). Banc One Acceptance Corp. v Hill,
  46. (2002). Boosting Consumer Confidence in E-Business: Recommendations for Establishing Fair and Effective Dispute Resolution Programs for B2C Online Transactions‘‘,
  47. BV v Kommaditgesellschaft in Firma Deco-Line,
  48. (2000). c, ―Click-Wrap Arbitration Clauses‖,
  49. (2003). Carruthers ,‖Conflicts of Laws Updates‖,
  50. (1990). Cases from other Jurisdictions Gas Authority of India, Ltd v SPIE-CAPAG,
  51. Centers Network, available at: accessed on 15/05/2006
  52. Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing ODR‖,
  53. (1999). Chapters in Edited Books Alvarez, Guillermo Aguilar, ―Article II(2) of the New York Convention and the Courts‖, in Albert Jan Van Den Berg (ed)
  54. (1994). Choice of Law and ―Foreign‖ Mandatory Rules
  55. (1998). Choice of Law by Arbitrators: The App licable Conflict of Laws System‖,
  56. (2007). Choice-of-Law Rules For Electronic Consumer Contracts: Replacement of the Rome Convention by the Rome I Regulation‖,
  57. (1981). Claims Settlement Declaration of 19
  58. (2001). Colin Rule, Online Dispute Resolution for Business, (Jossey-Bass,
  59. (1989). Commercial Arbitration, (1st edn,
  60. (2005). Commission of the European Communities, ―Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligation (Rome I)‖,
  61. (1997). Communications, Proposals and Reports Communications and Proposals A European Initiative in Electronic Commerce:
  62. (1999). Comparative Law in A Changing World, (2nd edn, Cavendish Publishig Limited,
  63. (1949). Comparative Law: An Introduction to the Comparative Method
  64. (1983). Cone Memorial Hospital v Mercury Construction,
  65. (1981). Conflict of Law Rules for Arbitrators‖, in Festschrift für Konrad Zweigert
  66. (1993). Conflict of Laws Issues
  67. (2003). Conflicts of Laws Updates‖,
  68. (2000). Consent to Arbitration Through Agreement to Printed Contracts: The Continental Experience‖,
  69. (1985). Consumer and Trading Law: Cases and Materials,
  70. (2004). Consumer Arbitration Agreements: Enforceability and Other Topics, (4th edn, National Consumer Law Centre,
  71. (1998). Consumer Arbitration as Exceptional Consumer Law (With a Contractualist Reply to Carrington & Haagen)‖,
  72. (2002). Consumer Arbitration in the European Union and the United States‘‘,
  73. (1999). Consumer Litigation: An International Perspective‖,
  74. (2005). Consumer Protection Law, (2nd edn, Ashgate,
  75. (1999). Consumers@shopping: An International Comparative study of Electronic
  76. (2005). Contract Law, (1st edn, OUP,
  77. (1994). Contract Law: Cases, Materials and Commentary,
  78. (2005). Contract Law: Test, Cases, and Materials, (2nd edn, OUP,
  79. (1943). Contracts of Adhesion-Some Thoughts about Freedom of Contract‖,
  80. (1999). Contracts, (3rd edn,
  81. (2001). Contractual Choice of Law: Legislative Choice in an Era of Party Autonomy‖,
  82. (1958). Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
  83. (2005). Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications
  84. (1968). Corp. v Continental Casualty Co.,
  85. (2000). Cranston's Consumers and the Law, (3rd edn,
  86. (2002). Creating a Market for Justice; A Market Incentive Solution to Regulating the Playing Field: Judicial Deference,
  87. (2005). Critical Analysis of Online Dispute Resolutions: The Optimist, the Realist and the Bewildered‖,
  88. (1999). Current Developments in Online Dispute Resolution‖,
  89. Cyber Consumer Law and Unfair Trading Practices,
  90. (2005). Cyber Consumer Law and Unfair Trading Practices, (1 st edn, Ashgate,
  91. (2004). Cyberjustice: Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) for E-Commerce, (1st edn,
  92. (2002). CyberMediation: Computer-Mediated Communications Medium Massaging the Message‖,
  93. (1996). Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order,
  94. (1923). Debate Sales and Contracts to Sell in Interstate Commerce and Foreign Commerce, and Federal Commercial Arbitration: Hearing before a Subcomm.
  95. (1999). Dialogue on Electronic Commerce, Consumer Confidence Working Group, ―The Paris Recommendations‖,
  96. (1979). Directive (2000/31/EC) of the European Parliament and of the
  97. Disciplining ODR Prototypes: True Trust through True Independence‖,
  98. (1999). Dispute Resolution
  99. (2000). Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace: Demand for New Forms of ADR‖,
  100. (1998). Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace‘‘,
  101. (1997). Dispute Resolution in International Electronic Commerce‖,
  102. Dispute Resolution,
  103. (2001). Disputes Solved in Cyberspace and the Rule of Law‖,
  104. (1996). Distinction Domestic-International Public Policy‖,
  105. (1992). Do Mandatory Rules of Public Law Limit Choice of Law
  106. (1999). Do the ―Haves‖ Come out Ahead in A lternative Judicial Systems?: Repeat Players in ADR‖,
  107. (1999). Do the ―Haves‖ Come out Ahead in Alternative Judicial Systems?: Repeat Players in ADR‖,
  108. (2004). Does Online Dispute Resolution Need Government Intervention? The Case for Architectures of Control and Trust‖,
  109. (2004). Does the Internet Occasion New Directions in Consumer Arbitration in the EU?‘‘,
  110. (2000). E-Commerce, E-Dispute, and E-Dispute Resolution: In the Shadow of eBay Law‖,
  111. (1990). Electric Corporation v Bridas Sociedad Anonima Petrolera,
  112. (2003). Electronic Assent to Online Contracts: Do Courts Consistently Enforce Clickwrap Agreements‖,
  113. (2001). Electronically-Mediated Dispute Resolution and E-Commerce‖,
  114. (1997). Enforcing Small Print to Protect Big Business: Employee and Consumer Rights Claims in an Age of Compelled Arbitrat ion‖,
  115. (1997). Enforcing Small Print to Protect Big Business: Employee and Consumer Rights Claims in an Age of Compelled Arbitration‖,
  116. (1996). English Arbitration Act
  117. (2004). European Union Public Opinion on Issues Relating to Business to Consumer E-Commerce: Executive Summary‖,
  118. (2001). Factors affecting E- commerce contract law‖, (paper presented at the 20th British and Irish Law,
  119. (2003). Final ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards‖,
  120. (2006). First UN Convention on eCommerce Finalized‖,
  121. (1999). for Assigned Names and Numbers Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (As Approved on
  122. (1992). Forum-Selection Clauses and the Privatization of Procedure‖,
  123. (2002). Forum-Selection Clauses in Consumer Clickwrap and Browsewrap Agreements and the ―Reasonably Communicated‖ Test‖,
  124. Global Business Regulation,
  125. Globalisation and ODR:
  126. Going Private:
  127. (1994). Good Faith
  128. (1999). Good Faith in Consumer Contracting‖,
  129. (1958). Group II, ‗Article II (2) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
  130. (2006). Groups and Reports UNCITRAL Working Group II (Arbitration), 44th session,
  131. (1999). Harris v Green Tree Financial Corp.,
  132. (1991). Hofherr, ―Forum Selection Clauses in Consumer Contracts: An Unconscionable Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum‖,
  133. ICANN Rules for Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy. ICANN is the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. The Rules are available at: accessed on 12/12/2007.
  134. (2000). Illegality and Public Policy: Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in England ‖,
  135. (2000). Illegality and Public Policy: Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in England‖,
  136. (2002). Inc. v Taylor,
  137. (1998). Institutional arbitration rules Arbitration Rules of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrator‘s Scheme for the Travel Industry, available at:
  138. (2003). Interim ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards‖,
  139. (2003). International Commercial Arb itration and Online Dispute Resolution‖,
  140. (2002). International Commercial Arbitrat ion in Cyberspace: Recent Developments‖,
  141. (1997). International Commercial Arbitrat ion on the Internet: Has the Future Come Too Early‖,
  142. (2003). International Commercial Arbitration and Online Dispute Resolution‖,
  143. (2002). International Commercial Arbitration in Cyberspace: Recent Developments‖,
  144. (2001). International Commercial Arbitration, (2nd edn,
  145. International Commercial Arbitration: Scotland and the UNCITRAL Model Law,
  146. (2003). International Perspective on Consumers’ Access to
  147. (2002). Is the US Out on a Limb? Comparing the US Approach to Mandatory Consumer and Employment Arbitration to that of the Rest of the World‖,
  148. (1997). Just Click Here: Art icle 2B‘s Failure to Guarantee Adequate Manifestation of Assent in Click-Wrap Contracts‖,
  149. (1997). Just Click Here: Article 2B‘s Failure to Guarantee Adequate Manifestation of Assent in Click-Wrap Contracts‖,
  150. Keep it Online: the Hague Convention and the Need for Online Alternative Dispute Resolution
  151. (1998). LCIA Arbit ration Rules
  152. (1999). Learning Legal Skills, (3rd edn,
  153. Legal Obstacles to ADR in European Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce‖, available at: accessed on 20/11/2004.
  154. (1988). Legislative Comment: Consumer Arb itration Agreement Act
  155. (1988). Legislative Comment: Consumer Arbitration Agreement Act
  156. (2000). Lieschke v RealNetworks, Inc.,
  157. (2002). London Ltd v Apostolakis & Anor,
  158. (2005). Lòpez, ―Arbitration and IT‖,
  159. (1994). Lord Mackay of, The Administration of Justice,
  160. (2000). Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts:
  161. (1986). Mandatory Rules of Law
  162. (1996). Mandatory Rules of Law as a Limitation on the Law Applicable
  163. (1997). Mandatory Rules of Law versus Party Autonomy
  164. (2001). Martin Odams, ‗‗Effective Means of Resolving Distance Selling Dispute‘‘,
  165. (2001). Martin Odams, ‗‗Why Resolve E-commerce Dispute Online‘‘,
  166. (1999). Maximizing the Enforceability of Click-Wrap Agreements‘‘,
  167. (1984). Morelite Construction Corp. v N.Y.C. District Council Carpenters' Benefit Funds, 748 F.2d 79 (2d Cir.
  168. Mostaza Claro v Centro Móvil Milenium SL,
  169. (1991). My Way and the Highway: the Law and Economics of Choice of Forum Clauses in Consumer Form Contracts‖,
  170. (1997). National Models of European Contract Law: A Comparative Approach to the Concept of Unfairness in Directive 93/13‖,
  171. (1998). note 93 supra, p.427 Beda Wortmann, ―Choice of Law by Arbitrators: The Applicable Conflict of Laws System‖,
  172. (2002). ODR: the New Kid in Town‖,
  173. (1999). OECD Guidelines for Consumer Protection in the Context of Electronic Commerce,
  174. of Arbitrator‘s Arbitration Scheme for Travel Industry, available at: <>, accessed on 15/12/2007.
  175. (1999). of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its thirty-second session‖,
  176. Office for Developed and Transition Economies, ―Disputes in Cyberspace 2001: Update of Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in Cross-Border Disputes‖, available at: accessed on 12/07/2005.
  177. (2001). on Consumer Policy, ―Building Trust in the Online Environment: Business to Consume Dispute Resolution.
  178. (1997). On Repeat Players, Adhesive Contracts, and the Use of Statistics in
  179. (1999). On- line Arbitration: Issues and Solutions‖,
  180. (2002). Online Arbit ration of Cross -Border, Business to Consumer Disputes‖,
  181. (2002). Online Arbitration and E-commerce‖,
  182. (2002). Online Arbitration of Cross-Border, Business to Consumer Disputes‖,
  183. (2002). Online Dispute Resolution for Business,
  184. (2002). Online Dispute Resolution in Business-to-Consumer E-commerce Transactions‖,
  185. (2004). Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice, (1st edn, Kluwer Law international,
  186. (2003). Online Dispute Resolution: Present Realities, Pressing Problems and Future Prospects‘‘,
  187. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace, (1st edn, Jossey-Bass,
  188. (2003). Online Dispute Resolution: the Emperor‘s New Clothes?: Benefits and Pitfalls of Online Dispute Resolution and its Application to Commercial Arbitration‖,
  189. (2000). Online Dispute Resolution‖, (Summer 2005) 10(2) Lex Electronica.1, 69, available at: accessed on 12/06/2006
  190. (2001). Online International Arb itration: Nine Issues Crucial to Its Success‖,
  191. (2001). Online International Arbitration: Nine Issues Crucial to Its Success‖,
  192. (2002). Online Services of the International Centre for Dispute Resolution of the American Arbitration Association‖,
  193. (2000). Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement System for E-commerce‖, Report on Legal Issues, Part I: Parties to the Dispute,
  194. (2000). Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement Systems for E-commerce‘‘, Report on Legal Issues Par III: Types of Out-of-Court Dispute Settelment,
  195. (2001). p.9. available at: > accessed on 13/06/2005. Lucille
  196. (2001). p.9. available at: >, accessed on 13/06/2005.
  197. (1996). Panacea or Corporate Tool?: Debunking the Supreme Courts Preference for Binding Arbitration‖,
  198. (1999). Pau l Motion, ―Article 17 ECD: Encouragement of Alternative Dispute Resolution On-line Dispute Resolution: A View from Scotland‖, in Lilian Edwards (eds), The New Legal Framework for E-Commerce in Europe,
  199. (2000). Planning for International Dispute Resolution‖,
  200. (2001). Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration in Consumer Contacts: a Call for Reform‘‘,
  201. (2000). Private Law, Public ―Justice‖: Another Look at Privacy, Arbitrat ion, and Global E-commerce‖,
  202. (2000). Private Law, Public ―Justice‖: Another Look at Privacy, Arbitration, and Global E-commerce‖,
  203. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  204. (1996). Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v C.A. Reaseguradora Nacional de Venezuela,
  205. (1999). Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC)
  206. Proposal to Use Alternative Dispute Resolution as a Foundation to Build an Independent Global Cyberlaw Jurisdiction Using Business to Consumer Transactions as a Model‖, (2001-2002) 25 Hastings Int‘l
  207. (1999). Protecting the Dig ital Consumer: The Limits of Cyberspace Utopianism‖,
  208. (1999). Protecting the Digital Consumer: The Limits of Cyberspace Utopianism‖,
  209. (2001). Provid ing Legal Serv ices for the Middle Class in Cyberspace: The Promise and Challenge of On
  210. (2001). Providing Legal Services for the Middle Class
  211. (2003). Public Policy and the Enforcement of Arbitral awards: Should there be a Global Standard?‖,
  212. (1997). Public Policy and the Law Applicab le to the Dispute
  213. Public Policy and the Law Applicable to the Dispute
  214. (1987). Quijas v Shearson/American Express,
  215. (1997). Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments on the Existence and Validity of an Arbitration Clause under the Brussels Convention‖,
  216. (1998). Regulating Dispute Resolution Provis ions in Adhesion Contracts‖,
  217. (1998). Regulating Dispute Resolution Provisions in Adhesion Contracts‖,
  218. (1993). Report from the Commission on the Implementation of Council Directive
  219. (1978). Report on the Convention of 9
  220. Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations‖,
  221. Reports Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market, ―Report on the Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC)
  222. (2003). Research into Alternative Online Dispute Resolution‖, Exploration Report prepared for the Department of
  223. (2003). Resolving Consumer Disputes Online: A Review of Consumer ODR‖,
  224. (2000). Resources Arnold Vahrenwald, ‗‗Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement System for E-commerce‘‘, Report on Legal Issues, Part II The Protection of the Recipient,
  225. (1971). Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws
  226. (1971). Restatement Second of Conflict of Laws
  227. (1971). Restatement Second of Conflicts of Laws
  228. (1997). Rethinking the Constitutionality of the Supreme Courts Preference for Binding Arbitration: A Fresh Assessment of Jury Trial, Separation of Powers, and Due Process‖,
  229. (1980). Rome Convention
  230. Rules of the Virtual Magistrate Online Arbitration Program, available at : < >, accessed on 15/12/2007.
  231. (1998). Rustic Justice: Community and Coercion under the Federal Arbitration Act‖,
  232. (1998). Rusticum Judicium?: Private ―Courts‖ Enforcing Private Law and Public Rights: Regulating Virtual Arbitration in Cyberspace‖,
  233. (1997). Shaping New Legal Frontiers: Dispute Resolution for Internet‖,
  234. (1983). Simple Justice: How Litigants Fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program , (Rand,
  235. (2005). Solving the Pitfalls of Impartiality When Arbitrating in China: How the Lessons of the Soviet Union and Iran Can Provide Solutions to Western Parties Arbitrating in
  236. (2004). Technologies for Trust in Electronic Commerce‖,
  237. (2006). Ten Years of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Looking at the Past and Constructing the Future‖,
  238. (1991). The 1968 Brussels Convention and Arbitration‖,
  239. (1982). The Applciable Law an in International Commercial Arbitration: Is It Still a Conflict of Laws Problem‖,
  240. (1996). The Applicable Law
  241. (1994). The Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Disputes with Particular Emphasis on the Situation
  242. (2001). The Arbitration Exception in the Brussels and Lugano Conventions: Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments‖,
  243. (2001). The Arbitration Exception in the Brussels Convention: Further Comment‖,
  244. The Choice of Applicable Law
  245. (2006). The Conflict of Laws, (3rd edn, OUP,
  246. (1988). The Consumer Arb itration Agreement Act
  247. (2001). The Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank Plc,
  248. (2006). The Fourth Party Rises: Evolving Environments of Online Dispute Resolution‖,
  249. (1999). The Freshfields Guide to Arbitration and ADR, (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London &
  250. (2004). The Global Information Society and Online Dispute Resolution: A New Dawn for Dispute Resolution‖,
  251. (2006). The Human Face of On- line Dispute Resolution‖,
  252. The Law and Practice of Arbitration,
  253. (1986). The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute‖,
  254. (1997). The Law of Contracts, (3rd edn,
  255. (2001). The Legal and Regulatory Environment for Electronic Information, (4th edn, Infonortics Ltd,
  256. (1990). The Orig ins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness ‖,
  257. (1990). The Origins and Consequences of Procedural Fairness‖,
  258. (2006). The Regulatory Framework for Online Dispute Resolution: A Critical View‖,
  259. (2002). The Relationship between Party Autonomy and the Mandatory Rules in the Rome Convention‖,
  260. The Relaxation of Inarbitrab ility and Public Policy checks on US and Foreign Arbitration: Arbitration out of Control‖, 65 Tul.
  261. (1988). The Role of Public Law
  262. (1999). Traitement et de Valorisation SA v Hilmarton Ltd
  263. (2000). Tree Financial Corp. et al v Randolph Larketta,
  264. (2000). Trust and Reliance-Enforcement and Compliance: Enhancing Consumer Confidence in the Electronic Marketplace‖,
  265. (2001). Unfair Arbitration Clauses‖,
  266. (1998). United States v Panhandle Eastern Corp,
  267. (2004). Using ADR to Resolve Online Disputes‖,
  268. (1961). v Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., 297 F.2d 80 (2d Cir.
  269. (1989). Washington Mut. Finance Group,
  270. (2000). What Price Civil Justice, (the Institute of Economic Affairs,
  271. (1985). Where is an Award ‗Made‘ ‖,
  272. (2000). Where on Earth Does Cyber-Arbitration Occur?: International Review of Arbitral Awards Rendered Online‖,
  273. (2005). Why Not Include Arbitration in the Brussels Jurisdiction Regulation?‖,
  274. (2000). Wining the Battle against Unfair Contract Terms‖,
  275. (1996). Working Groups Sessions, European Proposals and Communications and Parliamentary Debate English Reports and Parliamentary Debate Lord Fraser of Carmyllie,
  276. (1999). Zealander vLaing Homes Limited,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.