Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Soft constraints: or, Why I think Karl Weick's Sensemaking in organizations is a great big polychromed gee-whiz pacifier sputtering facts and unfacts like a wobbly Roman candle

By Thomas Basboll


Paper presented at “Practical Criticism in the Managerial Social Sciences”, University of Leicester School of Management, January 15 – 17, 2008. Draft as of 21 January 2008.In her article on style in the Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, Barbara Czarniawska has suggested that we categorize Karl Weick’s work as “poetic” (2003: 244). Weick acknowledges this epithet in his contribution to Organization Studies’ autobiographical “Vita Contemplativa” series:\ud “It is true,” he says, “that some of the more popular parts of the organizational behaviour books I’ve written have been the poems I cite” (2004: 654, his emphasis). With this in mind, I want here to\ud take a close look at two instances of poetry that are cited in Weick’s influential Sensemaking in Organizations (1995). “How I work and who I am,” Weick tells us, “may be reflected in those choices [of poems to cite] more candidly than I realized or intended.” I think this is quite true, and it\ud is how he works and who he is that I want to understand. Or rather, I want to indicate, as a warning to management scholars, how one might come to work and who one might become if one allows Weick’s poetic style to inspire one’s research. Weick is generally considered one of the great stylists of organization theory. He even takes this view himself. He apologizes in advance for not being able to provide more than a\ud “plausible” account of his scholarly practices because, as Czarniawska has noted, “poetic stylists ‘need not know how they are doing what they are doing in order to do it brilliantly’”. He may even be outright “inimitable”, he suggests, because his “uniqueness forms part of what is perceived as elegant” (Weick 2004:654, quoting Czarniawska 2003:255). His estimation of his own work is in fact refreshingly unreserved; looking for a way to “demystify” his unique poetic gifts, Weick turns to Harold Bloom’s book Genius. Here he finds a quote by Paul Valéry that might shed some light on the secret of his stylistic success. Originality, says Valéry, depends on our inability “to trace the\ud hidden transformations that [other authors] underwent in his mind.” Weick clearly identifies with this description of literary originality. Listing a few of his progenitors, Weick explains that his intertextual dependence is “complex, irregular, intricate, and filled with ‘hidden transformations’.” To help us get a sense of his situation as a writer, he presents us with an image of his research\ud involving “books spread out on the desk”, “notes and marginalia”, “aspirations” and “improvisations”. “It’s all pretty chaotic,” he says. In fact, as must be expected of attempts to see through the workings of all great minds, Weick is not at all optimistic about making sense of how\ud he accomplishes what he does. “Hidden means hidden” (Weick 2004: 654). As I will try to show in this paper, however, while Weick does sometimes hide his inter-textual relations, their transformation is often hard to spot. In the case of at least two poems he cites in Sensemaking in\ud Organizations, there isn’t much of a mystery at all. In one case he simply quotes Pablo Neruda’s “We Are Many” in full without interpretation and, in another, he straightforwardly plagiarizes Miroslav Holub’s “Brief Thoughts of Maps”

Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1982). An Assessment of Laboratory Experiments in Accounting’, doi
  2. (1998). Between Two Ages’, guest editorial
  3. (1977). Brief Thoughts on Maps’. Times Literary Supplement,
  4. (2004). Challenging the Foundations of Organization Theory’, doi
  5. (2006). Dear Editor: Reply to Basbøll and Graham”.
  6. (1989). Images at Random” (originally published in Harper’s in
  7. (1990). Introduction: Cartographic myths in organizations,’ in Mapping strategic thought
  8. Karl Weick: concepts, style, reflection’ doi
  9. (2001). Making sense of the organization. doi
  10. (1983). Misconceptions about managerial productivity’, doi
  11. (2004). Mundane Poetics: Searching for Wisdom in Organization Studies”. doi
  12. (1974). Permissions Clearance Advice for Authors and Editors’ Booth,
  13. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. doi
  14. (1998). Strategy Safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management doi
  15. (1995). Style as doi
  16. (2003). Substitutes for Strategy Research’.
  17. (1987). Substitutes for strategy,’ in The Competitive challenge: strategies for industrial innovation and renewal,
  18. (1995). The Craft of Research. Chicago: doi
  19. (2007). The Generative Properties of Richness”. doi
  20. (1981). The microsociological challenge of macro-sociology: Toward a reconstruction of social theory and methodology’
  21. (1967). The Put-on”. The New Yorker,
  22. (1969). The Social Psychology of Organizing. doi
  23. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination.’ doi
  24. (1972). Up the Family Tree” as reprinted in Existential Errands.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.