Location of Repository

In search of seminality: David Knights and Glenn Morgan on company strategy

By Peter Armstrong

Abstract

Paper for presentation at the Conference on Practical Criticism in the Managerial Social Sciences, Leicester University Management School, January 15th - 17th 2008.The purpose of this paper is to question the standards of scholarship now current in the discipline of organization studies. It does so through a close-reading of a paper which has a fair claim to seminal status, since it is widely cited within the literature and is described as seminal in a number of recent contributions. The paper is Knights and Morgan’s Foucaultian analysis of strategic management (1991) and the present analysis is best read with that text to hand.\ud \ud Read in detail, Knights and Morgan’s paper turns out to be deficient in almost every respect. Their claim that strategic management needs to be understood as a discourse which ‘constitutes the subjectivities’ of its practitioners amounts to an innovative of terminology only, since there is no suggestion as to what kind of evidence might distinguish that process from the conventional acquisition of technique. Their proposed history of the origins of strategic management does not fit the historical record. Their claims to theoretical and methodological advances over previous major works in the field are not substantiated and depend in any case on serious misrepresentations of those works. They present a drastically one-sided account of Foucault’s views on power, the application of which to strategic management is claimed as one of their major innovations. The one positive and original thing they have to say about strategic management – that it confers psychological benefits on those who practice it (‘power effects’) – is supported neither by evidence nor convincing argument.\ud \ud The analysis then proceeds to a 1995 paper by the same authors on the introduction of strategic approaches to IT and product management in a life insurance company. Interesting as a conventional narrative, the notable absence of ‘constituted subjectivities’, ‘power effects’ and, indeed, of any mention of Foucault in this study is primae facia evidence of the complete irrelevance of the ‘genealogical’ approach advocated in the 1991 paper. This conclusion is reinforced by two recent papers which claim to have provided empirical support for the original Foucaultian approach. Neither of them achieve anything of the kind.\ud \ud The analysis concludes by suggesting that Knights and Morgan’s 1991 paper continues to be cited in despite of its evident shortcomings because of the feverish intellectual climate which now prevails within organizational studies. Under pressure to produce innovative work in fields dominated by established reputations, young researchers may be attracted to any intellectual direction which promises to subvert those reputations and so provide space for new models of academic distinction. This, it is suggested, is the true nature of Knights and Morgan’s achievement, and it is one which may account for the failure of the academic community to take due note of the deficiencies of their work. In this sense it may be symptomatic of a discipline in which standards of scholarship have been eroded in a frantic search for novelty

Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/3594

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1991). A Letter to Marta Calás and Linda Smircich. doi
  2. (1978). Aesthetics and Politics. doi
  3. (1995). All Quiet on the Workplace Front - A Critique of Recent Trends in British Industrial Sociology. doi
  4. (2004). Becoming Manager - or, the Werewolf Looks Anxiously in the Mirror, Checking for Unusual Facial Hair. doi
  5. (1969). Being and Nothingness : an Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. doi
  6. (2000). Braverman and the contribution of labour process analysis to the critique of capitalist production - Twenty-five years on. doi
  7. (1983). Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. doi
  8. (1987). Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm. doi
  9. (1965). Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill Argenti,
  10. (1978). Economy and Society : an Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Tr. Ephraim Fischoff et al. London :
  11. (1981). English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit 1850-1980. Cambridge : doi
  12. (1947). From Max Weber : essays in sociology. doi
  13. (2004). Gendered Rationality? A Genealogical Exploration doi
  14. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital. doi
  15. (1987). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Postmodernity and Intellectuals. Culture as the Ideology of Intellectuals. doi
  16. (1953). Management Education in American Business. doi
  17. (1979). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor process under Monopoly Capitalism. doi
  18. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications. Pentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs,
  19. (1988). Modernism, Post-Modernism and Organizational Analysis 2: The Contribution of Michel Foucault. doi
  20. (1984). Nietzche, Genealogy, History, in Rabinow, P doi
  21. (1971). Pierre S. DuPont and the Making of the Modern Corporation. doi
  22. (1984). Power and Subjectivity in Foucault.
  23. (1980). Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,
  24. (1987). Relevance Lost: the Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston Massachusetts. doi
  25. (2005). Strategic Practice, ‘Discourse’ and the Everyday Interactional Constitution doi
  26. (1995). Strategy under the Microscope: Strategic Management and IT in Financial Services, doi
  27. (2004). Strawmanning and Labour Process Analysis. doi
  28. (1960). Structure and Process in Modern Societies. doi
  29. (1990). Subjectivity and the Dialectic of Praxis: Openbing up the Core of Labour Process Analysis. doi
  30. (1990). Subjectivity, Power and the Labour Process. doi
  31. (1985). The Awakening Giant : Continuity and Change in Imperial Chemical Industries. doi
  32. (1957). The Concept of Power. doi
  33. (1977). The Concept of Social and Economic Formation: the Inca Example.
  34. (1968). The Inmate World. in Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates. doi
  35. (2003). The Social Construction of Management: Texts and Identities London. doi
  36. (1951). The Social System. London. Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi
  37. (1977). The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business. London, doi
  38. (1990). Top-Management-Team Tenure And Organizational Outcomes - The Moderating Role Of Managerial Discretion. doi
  39. (1982). Tracking Strategy in an Entrepreneurial Firm, doi
  40. (1990). Using History to Understand Theory: a Re-Consideration of the Historical Genesis of "Strategy"'. Paper delivered at the EIASM Workshop on Strategy, Accounting and Control,
  41. (1980). Voting for Ford.
  42. (1956). White Collar: the American Middle Class. doi
  43. (2002). Writing Organizational Analysis into Foucault. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.