Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Isolated urinary, fecal, and double incontinence: prevalence and degree of soiling in stroke survivors

By Katherine Brittain, Sarah Perry, Chris Shaw, Ruth J. Matthews, Carol Jagger and John Potter


This is a copy of the author's final draft, not the final published version.Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of isolated urinary and fecal, and double incontinence in community living stroke survivors and to assess the degree of soiling.\ud Design: Community based postal survey.\ud Setting: 64, 749 community dwelling residents (aged 40+) living in Leicestershire (UK) were randomly selected from the Leicestershire Health Authority register. Residents living in institutional settings were excluded.\ud Measurements: Respondents were asked about previous stroke, urinary and bowel symptoms, general health and demographic details including age, sex and ethnicity. Urinary incontinence was defined as leakage several times a month or more often. Major fecal incontinence was defined as soiling of underwear, outer clothing, furnishings or bedding several times a month or more often.\ud Results: A 65% response rate to the postal survey was obtained with the return of 39, 519 eligible questionnaires, with 4% (n=1483) reporting stroke. Five percent of stroke survivors reported major fecal incontinence, with 4.3% reporting both fecal and urinary incontinence and 0.8% reporting isolated fecal incontinence. Major fecal incontinence was four and a half times more prevalent in stroke survivors than the non-stroke population, and stroke survivors were also twice as likely to report soiling of furnishings or bedding. The presence of fecal incontinence in both the stroke and non-stroke population is influenced by functional limitations. \ud Conclusions\ud Fecal incontinence is common in stroke survivors and the degree of soiling can be considerable. Future research needs to explore the impact fecal incontinence can have on the lives of stroke survivors and on how it can best be managed in those living in the community.Medical Research Council and the National Health Service Research and Development Program on Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke

Publisher: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. An investigation into nonresponse bias in a postal survey on urinary symptoms. doi
  2. (2001). Colorectal symptoms in patients with neurological diseases. Acta Neurol Scand doi
  3. (1995). Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. doi
  4. (2000). Dually incontinent nursing home residents: clinical characteristics and treatment differences. doi
  5. (2003). Evidence-Based Nursing doi
  6. (1986). Faecal incontinence in residential homes for the elderly: prevalence, aetiology and management. Age Ageing doi
  7. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. doi
  8. (2000). Health. Good practice in continence services. doi
  9. (2001). Health. Modern standards and service models for older people: National service frameworks. doi
  10. (1999). Mortality in relation to urinary and faecal incontinence in elderly people living at home. Age Ageing doi
  11. (2003). New-onset fecal incontinence after stroke: prevalence, natural history, risk factors, and impact. Stroke doi
  12. (1995). Post stroke rehabilitation, clinical practice guideline
  13. (1995). Predictors of nursing home placement in community-based long-term care. doi
  14. Prevalence and correlates of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling older adults. doi
  15. (1997). Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke doi
  16. (1997). Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke doi
  17. Prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals. doi
  18. (1999). Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. doi
  19. (1998). Prevalence of fecal incontinence: what can be expected? doi
  20. (1992). Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. doi
  21. (1995). Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence in hospitals and residential and nursing homes for older people. doi
  22. (1999). Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut doi
  23. (2000). Royal College of Physicians of London. The intercollegiate working party for stroke: National clinical guidelines for stroke. doi
  24. (1998). Stroke and incontinence. doi
  25. The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence.
  26. (1982). The recovery of the severely disabled stroke patient. Rheumatology and Rehab doi
  27. (1997). Urinary and fecal incontinence in a community-residing older population in Japan. doi
  28. (1995). Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death and institutionalization in a general aged population. doi
  29. (1995). Validation of a population screening questionnaire to assess prevalence of stroke. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.