Location of Repository

‘Not rocket science’ or ‘No silver bullet’? Media and government discourses about MRSA and cleanliness

By Nelya Koteyko, Brigitte Nerlich, Paul Crawford and Nick Wright

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), commonly called a superbug, has recently been a major political issue in the UK, playing a significant role in debates over health policy in the general election held in 2005. While science recognizes the lack of evidence with regards to the effectiveness of existing measures implemented to control and prevent MRSA, the UK media coverage is dominated by articles that appeal to common sense and practical experience calling for more government interventions to combat the bug. In this paper we explore how uncertainty surrounding the origin and spread of MRSA is portrayed in debates within the media and policy-circles to particular political ends. Using established techniques of discourse analysis and corpus linguistics, we examine the assumptions, judgements, and contentions that structure two discourses of MRSA: according to one discourse MRSA is ‘not rocket science’ and there are ‘simple’ ways of coping with the risk of infection, whereas according to another discourse MRSA is a more complex matter and there is ‘no silver bullet’. The analysis of different storylines through which specific ideas of ‘blame’, ‘responsibility’, and ‘urgency’ are attributed helps to explain how different ‘constructions’ of causes for the rise in MRSA emerged and led to discourses of blame and defence centred on cleanliness

Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:1308
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (in press). ‘The moral careers of microbes and the rise of the matrons: An analysis of UK national press coverage of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 1995-2006,’ Health, Risk & Society, page numbers not known yet. doi
  2. (2004). A Matron's Charter: An action plan for cleaner hospitals.
  3. (2001). A province of a federal superstate, ruled by an unelected bureaucracy – keywords of the euro-sceptic discourse in Britain’
  4. (2003). Applied Linguistics. doi
  5. (2004). Applying corpus linguistics in a health care context,’ doi
  6. (2004). Changing ideas of bodily cleanliness’. Paper presented at 6th International Summer Academy on Technology Studies. Urban Infrastructure in Transition: What can we learn from history?
  7. (1995). Chasing Dirt: The American Pursuit of Cleanliness.
  8. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience.
  9. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge:
  10. (2006). Corpus analysis: the state of the art and three types of unanswered questions’
  11. (2005). Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Examining the Ideology of Sleaze’.
  12. (2006). Corpus Linguistics and study of meaning in discourse,’
  13. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation.
  14. (2004). Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus’
  15. (2005). Disease metaphors in new epidemics: doi
  16. (2001). Evidence that hospital hygiene is important in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus’.
  17. (2004). Foucault on targets,’
  18. (1993). Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm,’
  19. (2005). Hand washing is more important than cleaner wards in controlling
  20. (2001). Implementing the NHS Plan: Modern matrons -strengthening the role of ward sisters and introducing senior sisters (Health Service Circular 2001/010).
  21. (2001). Individual Freedom in Language Teaching: Helping Learners to Develop a Dialect of their Own. doi
  22. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity of the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies,’
  23. (2006). Language as choice: what is chosen?’
  24. (2006). MRSA and the newspaper media’.
  25. (2005). No magic bullet for MRSA,’ doi
  26. (2005). On why politics and MRSA don't mix,’
  27. (2007). Out of Control?’ Exchange Magazine,
  28. (1978). Phenomenology, linguistics, and popular literature’.
  29. (1997). Public Eyes and Private Genes: Historical Frames, doi
  30. (2002). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  31. (2006). Representations of mad cow disease,’
  32. (2005). Risk Management: It’s not rocket science: It’s more complicated,’ www.socialaffairsunit.org.uk/blog/archives/000318.php. [accessed 12
  33. (2004). SARS epidemic in the world, from March to July 2003: what lessons can be learned from press coverage?’
  34. (2000). Society, education and language’
  35. (2000). Some have Credit Cards and others have Giro Cheques: ‘Individuals' and ‘People'
  36. (1992). The Consequences of Modernity.
  37. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in,’
  38. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing’
  39. (2006). The hospital ‘Superbug’: social representations of doi
  40. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process.
  41. (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Melbourne:
  42. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue,’

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.