Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Can't do it, won't do it! Developing a theoretically framed intervention to encourage better decontamination practice in Scottish dental practices

By Debbie Bonetti, Linda Young, Irene Black, Heather Cassie, Craig R Ramsay and Jan Clarkson

Abstract

Background: Guidance on the cleaning of dental instruments in primary care has recently been published. The aims of this study are to determine if the publication of the guidance document was enough to influence decontamination best practice and to design an implementation intervention strategy, should it be required.\ud Methods: A postal questionnaire assessing current decontamination practice and beliefs was sent to a random sample of 200 general dental practitioners.\ud Results: Fifty-seven percent (N = 113) of general dental practitioners responded. The survey showed large variation in what dentists self-reported doing, perceived as necessary or practical to do, were willing to do, felt able to do, as well as what they planned to change. Only 15% self reported compliance with the five key guideline-recommended individual-level decontamination behaviours; only 2% reported compliance with all 11 key practice-level behaviours. The results also showed that our participants were almost equally split between dentists who were completely unmotivated to implement best decontamination practice or else highly motivated. The results suggested there was scope for further enhancing the implementation of decontamination guidance, and that an intervention with the greatest likelihood of success would require a tailored format, specifically targeting components of the theory of planned behaviour (attitude, perceived behavioural control, intention) and implementation intention theory (action planning).\ud Conclusion: Considerable resources are devoted to encouraging clinicians to implement evidence-based practice using interventions with erratic success records, or no known applicability to a specific clinical behaviour, selected mainly by means of researchers' intuition or optimism. The methodology used to develop this implementation intervention is not limited to decontamination or to a single segment of primary care. It is also in accordance with the preliminary stages of the framework for evaluating complex interventions suggested by the medical research council. The next phases of this work are to test the intervention feasibility and evaluate its effectiveness in a randomised control trial.NHS Education for Scotland (NES). \ud Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorat

Topics: Decontamination, Dental care, Dentist's practice patterns
Publisher: BMC
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/292
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A: Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs. Social Science and Medicine doi
  2. (2004). Abraham C: Interventions to Change Health Behaviours: Evidence-Based or Evidence-Inspired? Psychology and Health doi
  3. (2008). and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. doi
  4. Applying multiple models to predict clinicians' behavioural intention and objective behaviour when managing children's teeth. doi
  5. (2004). C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess doi
  6. (2003). Can psychological models bridge the gap between clinical guidelines and clinicians' behaviour? A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to influence dentists' intention to implement evidence-based practice. Br Dent J doi
  7. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote implementation of research findings by health care professionals. BMJ doi
  8. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Report to ReBEQI: Research Based Education and Quality Improvement
  9. (2006). Do self- reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: A systematic review. Implementation Science doi
  10. (1999). for Reviews and Dissemination: Getting evidence into practice. Effect Health Care
  11. (2004). Identifying good opportunities to act: Implementation intentions and cue discrimination. doi
  12. (1999). Implementation intentions and repeated behavior: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behavior. doi
  13. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin doi
  14. (1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans. doi
  15. (2007). Important advice for dentists on re-use of endodontic instruments and variant Creutzfeldt-Disease (vCJD). CMO
  16. (2001). Improving the quality of medical care. Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA doi
  17. (2002). Kinmouth A: Application of the Theory of planned behaviour in Behaviour Change Interventions: A systematic review. Psychology and Health doi
  18. (1977). Koch GG: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics doi
  19. (1989). Multiple Correlation: Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations. Psychological Bulletin doi
  20. (2005). NB: Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: The use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. doi
  21. (1998). RH: How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q doi
  22. (2007). Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme: Cleaning of Dental Instruments – Dental Clinical Guidance.
  23. (2007). Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee: Position Statement on vCJD and Dentistry.
  24. (2004). Sterile Services Provision review Group: Survey of Decontamination in General Dental Practice.
  25. (2001). Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. QHC doi
  26. (2006). T: Nosocomial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus via the Surfaces of the Dental Operatory. BDJ doi
  27. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes doi
  28. (2003). Theories of behaviour change in studies of guideline implementation.
  29. (2004). Vale ination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.