Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A United Kingdom survey of surgical technique and handling practice of inguinal canal structures during hernia surgery

By Rajan Ravindran, Julie Bruce, Debasish Debnath, Amudha Poobalan and Peter M. King

Abstract

Background: Recent trials have assessed the impact of elective nerve division on patient outcome after inguinal herniorrhaphy. The aim of this study was to establish UK surgical practice of handling of structures in the inguinal canal during herniorrhaphy. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all Fellows (n = 1113) of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) was performed. The main outcomes were to determine method of inguinal hernia repair and routine practice for intra-operative handling of structures in the inguinal canal. Results: A total of 852 (77%) questionnaires were returned, of which 784 (92%) surgeons performed inguinal herniorrhaphy. Approximately two-thirds (63%) of responding surgeons performed less than 50 procedures per annum and 37% conducted more than 50 procedures annually. Mesh was the preferred method used by 90% of surgeons; 6% used non-mesh, and 4% used other (laparoscopic) methods. Routine practice in relation to the inguinal structures varied by volume of hernia surgery; surgeons who conducted more than 50 procedures annually were more likely to visualize and preserve inguinal nerve structures. However, inconsistency in the answers suggested confusion over anatomy. Conclusion: This is the first UK survey to investigate method of hernia repair and usual handling practice of inguinal canal structures. There was wide acceptance of the use of mesh in inguinal hernia repair, with the majority of UK surgeons favoring an open approach. Surgeons performing high volumes of herniorrhaphy were more likely to preserve, rather than transect, inguinal nerve structures. This variation in practice may confound assessment of long-term neuralgia and other post-herniorrhaphy pain syndromes

Publisher: Mosby
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/189
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. doi
  2. Cause and prevention of postherniorrhaphy neuralgia: a proposed protocol for treatment. doi
  3. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. doi
  4. (1996). Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg doi
  5. Diagnosis and treatment of genitofemoral and ilioinguinal neuralgia. doi
  6. Elective neurectomy during open, ‘‘tension free’’ inguinal hernia repair. doi
  7. Five-year follow-up of a randomised trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. doi
  8. (2004). for Clinical Excellence. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. doi
  9. (1998). Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy? doi
  10. Pilot randomized controlled study of preservation or division of ilioinguinal nerve in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. doi
  11. Questionnaire surveys. doi
  12. (2006). Randomized controlled trial of preservation or elective division of ilioinguinal nerve on open inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. doi
  13. Testicular atrophy and chronic residual neuralgia as risks of inguinal hernioplasty.
  14. Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.