Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

FDI location across British regions and inward investment policy

By Jonathan Jones and Colin Wren


The theory and empirical evidence on FDI location emphasise agglomeration economies over classical location factors, such as grants. This paper uses panel data to analyse the effect of the main instrument of inward investment policy, the UK regional policy grants, on the distribution of FDI projects across British regions over 1985-05. Using a GMM estimator the paper finds grants have a significant effect on FDI, even when agglomeration terms are included, but that its effect diminished over the 1990s. This is attributed to a redrawing of the eligible areas map. It concludes that in relation to foreign investment regional policy is no longer able to affect the regional distribution of FDI, so the grants are an instrument of national development policy

Topics: HG Finance, JA Political science (General)
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). A Short Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments’, Working Paper Number 125, Center for Global Development,
  2. (2000). Agglomeration and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in Portugal, doi
  3. (1995). Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States, doi
  4. (2002). Agglomeration Economies: Ambiguities and Confusions’, doi
  5. (2003). Agglomeration, Regional Grants and Firm Location’, Working Paper WP04/06, The Institute for Fiscal Studies, doi
  6. (1996). Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in doi
  7. (1993). An Analysis of the Factors Determining the Geographical Distribution of doi
  8. (1999). Attracting Foreign Manufacturing: Investment Promotion and Agglomeration, doi
  9. (2004). Do Inward Investors Achieve Their Job Targets?’, doi
  10. (1999). Domestic Institutions, Agglomerations and Foreign Direct Investment in doi
  11. (2002). Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice’, doi
  12. (1999). Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide for Macroeconomists’, doi
  13. (2002). European Regional Policies in the Light of Recent Location Theories’, doi
  14. (1977). Evaluation of Regional Selective Assistance 1991-1995, Arup Economics
  15. (2004). Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economy’, doi
  16. (2006). Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy’, doi
  17. (2007). Firm Location Decisions, Regional Grants and Agglomeration Economies’, doi
  18. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment: Agglomeration Economies and Returns to Promotion Expenditures,
  19. (2007). Geography and Economic Performance: Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis for Great Britain’, doi
  20. (2009). Grants and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from the UK Regions’,
  21. (1996). Host Country Characteristics and Agglomeration in Foreign Direct Investment’, doi
  22. (2004). How Do Firms Agglomerate? doi
  23. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, doi
  24. (1986). Increasing Returns and Lon-Run Growth’, doi
  25. (1992). International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of US Firms’, doi
  26. (2003). Marshall’s Scale Economies’, doi
  27. (2001). Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment’, World Bank Research Observer, doi
  28. (2000). Productivity in the UK: The Evidence and the Government’s Approach,
  29. (2004). Prospects for Foreign Direct Investment and the Strategies of Transnational Corporations, United Nations,
  30. (2009). Re-investment and the Survival of Foreign-owned Plants’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, forthcoming. Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC) London School of Economics Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE Tel:
  31. (2005). Regional Convergence in Argentina: A Spatial Panel Data Approach’, Discussion Paper 2005.06, TEAM-CNRS,
  32. (2004). Regional Convergence in the European Union, 1985-99: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Analysis’, doi
  33. (2003). Regional Foreign Direct Investment and Wage Spillovers: Plant Level Evidence from the UK Electronics Industry’, doi
  34. (2005). Regional Grants: Are They Worth It?’, doi
  35. (1993). Regional Selective Assistance, 1985-88: An Evaluation by PA Cambridge Economic Consultants, PA Cambridge Economic Consultants,
  36. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and Application to Employment Equations’, doi
  37. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation, doi
  38. (2001). Spatial Econometrics’, doi
  39. (1991). State Characteristics and the Location of FDI within the United States’, doi
  40. (1998). Taxes and the Location of Production: Evidence from a Panel of US Multinationals’, doi
  41. (2003). The Department of Trade and Industry: Regional Grants
  42. (2002). The Effect of State Economic Development Incentives on Employment Growth of Establishments, doi
  43. (1999). The Location Of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis’, doi
  44. (1982). The Location of Overseas Production and Production for Export by US Multinational Firms’, doi
  45. (1989). The New Competitors: How Foreign Investors are Changing the US Economy, doi
  46. (2002). The Productivity and Wage Effects of Foreign Acquisition in the UK, doi
  47. (1999). The Regional Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in China’, doi
  48. (1992). The UK Regional Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment: Analysis and Determinants’, doi
  49. (2005). Transport Costs: Measures, Determinants, and Regional Policy Implications for France’, doi
  50. (2003). Unconditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Models for Spatial Panels’, Research Report 03C27, SOM, doi
  51. (2002). Unemployment Clusters Across European Regions and Countries’, doi
  52. (1999). Using the ARD Establishment Level Data to Look at Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom, doi
  53. (1992). What Attracts Foreign Mulinational Corporations? Evidence from Branch Plant Location in the United States’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.