Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Does the rotten child spoil his companion?: spatial peer effects among children in rural india

By Christian Helmers and Manasa Patnam

Abstract

This paper identifies the effect of neighborhood peer groups on childhood skill acquisition using observational data. We incorporate spatial peer interaction, defined as a child’s nearest geographical neighbors, into a production function of child cognitive development in Andhra Pradesh, India. Our peer group definition takes the form of networks, whose structure allows us to separately identify endogenous peer effects and contextual effects. We exploit variation over time to avoid confounding correlated with social effects. Our results suggest that spatial peer and neighborhood effects are strongly positively associated with a child’s cognitive skill formation. Further, we find that the presence of peer groups helps provide insurance against the negative impact of idiosyncratic shocks to child learning. We show that peer effects are robust to different specifications of peer interactions and investigate the sensitivity of our estimates to potential mis-specification of the network structure using Monte Carlo experiments

Topics: G Geography (General), HC Economic History and Conditions, L Education (General)
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC)
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33558
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001): ‘Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates’, doi
  2. (1999). A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model’, doi
  3. (1998). A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances’, doi
  4. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity’, doi
  5. and Cacciola S.E.(2001) ‘Inside the’Black Box’of Project STAR: Estimation of peer effects using experimental data’, Economic Growth Center, Discussion Paper 832,
  6. (2001). Child health and school enrollment: A longitudinal analysis’, doi
  7. (1993). Do Neighborhoods Affect Child and Adolescent Development?’, doi
  8. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement?’, doi
  9. (2008). Errors in variables and spatial effects in hedonic house price models of ambient air quality’, doi
  10. (2006). Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation’, mimeo, doi
  11. (1997). Estimation of spatial regression models with autoregressive errors by twostage least squares procedures: a serious problem’, doi
  12. (1995). Ethnicity, Neighborhoods, and Human-Capital Externalities’, doi
  13. Florax Raymond and Cho Seong-Hoon (2008): ‘Bandwidth selection for spatial HAC and other robust covariance estimators’,
  14. (2008). Formulating, Identifying and Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation’, doi
  15. (1999). GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence’, doi
  16. (2007). HAC Estimation in a Spatial Framework’, doi
  17. (2008). Heckman James and ter Weel Bas doi
  18. (2007). Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects’, doi
  19. (1993). Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem’, doi
  20. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks’, doi
  21. (2006). Identifying Social Interactions: A Review’, doi
  22. (2010). Income Shocks and Investments in Human Capital’,
  23. (2002). Insuring Consumption against Illness’, doi
  24. (1988). Intrahousehold allocation of nutrients in rural India: Are boys favored? Do parents exhibit inequality aversion?’,
  25. (1982). Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India’,
  26. (1992). Measuring Peer Group Effects: doi
  27. (2001). Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Results of a Randomized Mobility Experiment’, doi
  28. (2004). Neighborhood Effects’, doi
  29. (2001). Neighbourhood and family influences on the cognitive ability of children in doi
  30. (2007). Peer effects and student academic achievement: an application of spatial autoregressive model with group unobservables’, mimeo, doi
  31. (2008). Place of Work and Place of Residence: doi
  32. (2001). Policy interventions, low-level equilibria, and social interactions’,
  33. (2009). Political Violence and Social Networks: Experimental Evidence from a Nigerian Election’, doi
  34. (2009). Psychometric characteristics of cognitive development and achievement instruments in Round 2 of Young Lives’, Young Lives
  35. (1994). Risk and Insurance in Village doi
  36. (2006). Risk-Sharing Networks and Insurance against Illness’, doi
  37. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation’, doi
  38. (1992). Spatial econometrics in practice: A review of software options’, doi
  39. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models’, doi
  40. (2009). Spatial Structure of the French dairy sector: a spatial HAC estimation’,
  41. (2009). Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances,’ doi
  42. (2010). sphet: Spatial Models with heteroskedastic innovations,’ R package version 0.1-22.
  43. (2010). The Formation and Evolution of Childhood Skill Acquisition: Evidence from India’, doi
  44. (2009). The Timing of Parental Income on Child Outcomes: The Role of Permanent and Transitory Shocks’, Working Paper Centre for Economic Performance,
  45. (2002). Why Does it Take a Village? The Mediation of Neighborhood Effects doi
  46. (2008). with contributions by Luc Anselin, Olaf Berke, Andrew Bernat, Marilia Carvalho, Yongwan Chun, Carsten Dormann, Stphane Dray, Rein Halbersma, Nicholas Lewin-Koh,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.