Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The entanglement of technology and work in organizations

By Wanda J. Orlikowski and Susan V. Scott

Abstract

We begin by juxtaposing the pervasive presence of technology in organizational work with its absence from the organization studies literature. Our analysis of four leading journals in the field confirms that over 95 percent of the article published in top management research outlets do not take into account the role of technology in organizational life. We then examine the research that has been done on technology, and categorize this literature into two research streams according to their view of technology: individuality and duality. For each stream, we discuss three reviews spanning the last 20 years of scholarship and join with them in concluding that despite a widespread perception that much is known about the consequences of technology and work in organizations, and that additional perspectives are needed to add to the palette of conceptual lenses in use. Drawing on work in the sociology of technology, we discuss one such promising alternative – sociomateriality – which questions the assumption that technology, work, and organizations should be conceptualized separately. We illustrate this approach with a discussion of two specific examples of sociomateriality – web search and financial decision-making. We conclude by suggesting that a reconsideration of our conventional views of technology will help us more effectively study and understand the multiple, emergent, and dynamic sociomaterial configurations that constitute contemporary organizational practices

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor, T Technology (General)
Publisher: Information Systems and Innovation Group, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33898
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33898... (external link)
  • http://www.lse.ac.uk/collectio... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33898... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2006). 20). “Searches per Day,” Search Engine Watch.
    2. (2006). 25). “Google Censors itself for China.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4645596.stm Bechky,
    3. (1986). A Framework for Analyzing Technical Systems
    4. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in doi
    5. (1994). A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: doi
    6. (1990). A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making,” doi
    7. (2009). Agencies at the Interface.” Presentation at the doi
    8. (1964). Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. doi
    9. (1979). Assessment of Technology in Organizations: Closed versus Open Systems Approaches,” doi
    10. (1991). Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing.” doi
    11. (1983). Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. Thousand Oaks,
    12. (1990). Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change doi
    13. (1995). Communication across Boundaries: Work, Structure, doi
    14. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaningful, and identity. doi
    15. (2006). Completing the Practice Turn in doi
    16. (1998). Computer-mediated Interpretation of Risk: The Introduction of Decision Support Systems in a UK Retail Bank. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation,
    17. (2001). Computerization Movements: The Rise of the Internet and Distant Forms of Work.” In doi
    18. (2007). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. doi
    19. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. doi
    20. (2007). Deconstructing TripAdvisor,” Wall Street Journal,
    21. (2007). Digital Calculator Report,
    22. (1994). Electronic Mail as the Medium of doi
    23. (1986). Employee Attitudes Toward Working with doi
    24. (2005). Enacting Integrated Information Technology: doi
    25. (1992). Epistemological Chicken.”
    26. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior. doi
    27. (1999). Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres: doi
    28. (1984). Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, doi
    29. (1967). Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations,'' doi
    30. (1998). Google: A Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine.” Archived Presentation. doi
    31. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. doi
    32. (1988). Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of doi
    33. (2003). Institutional Carriers: Reviewing Modes of Transporting Ideas over Time and Space and Considering their doi
    34. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between doi
    35. (2006). Institutions and Technology Frameworks for Understanding Organizational Change: The Case of a Major ICT Outsourcing Contract,” doi
    36. (1991). Integrated Information Environment or Matrix of Control?: doi
    37. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. doi
    38. (2000). IT and Organizational Change: An Institutionalist Perspective, doi
    39. (2000). IT-Enabled Credit Risk Modernisation: A Revolution under the Cloak of Normality.” Accounting, doi
    40. (2002). Localized Google Search Result Exclusions: Statement of Issues and Call for Data.” Report of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society,
    41. (2000). Making Connections: doi
    42. (1958). Management and Technology.
    43. (2005). Material Works: Exploring the Situated Entanglement of Technological Performativity and Human Agency.”
    44. (2007). Meeting the University Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. doi
    45. (1997). Of Forms, Containers, and the Electronic Medical Record: Some Tools for a doi
    46. (1970). Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. doi
    47. (2006). Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. doi
    48. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of doi
    49. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems doi
    50. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of doi
    51. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain. doi
    52. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How doi
    53. (2001). Practice Theory.” In doi
    54. (2002). Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal doi
    55. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. doi
    56. (1987). Science in Action. doi
    57. (1987). Science in Action. Boston:
    58. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of doi
    59. (1996). Social Shaping of Information Infrastructure: On Being Specific about the Technology.”
    60. (1997). Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in doi
    61. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at doi
    62. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translations:
    63. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. doi
    64. (1994). Sticky Information’ and the Locus of Problem Solving: doi
    65. (2005). Strategy as Practice. doi
    66. (1993). Symbolic Processes in the Implementation of Technological Change: A Symbolic Interactionist doi
    67. (2005). Taking Practice Seriously: Toward a Relational Ontology.” doi
    68. (1972). Technology and Organizational Structure: A Reexamination of the doi
    69. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from doi
    70. (1990). Technology as Equivoque.” In
    71. (1982). Technology-Structure Research: Three Critical Issues,” doi
    72. (1998). The Anatomy of a Large-scale Hypertextual doi
    73. (2005). The Art of Knowing: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the doi
    74. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. doi
    75. (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: doi
    76. (2006). The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change. doi
    77. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. Berkeley CA:
    78. (1998). The Discipline of Teams: doi
    79. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. doi
    80. (2002). The Expansion of Knowledge: Carriers, Flows, and Sources. doi
    81. (1997). The Machine at Work. doi
    82. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. doi
    83. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory.
    84. (2001). The Role of Information Technology in the Organization: A Review, Model, doi
    85. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. doi
    86. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of doi
    87. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT and London: doi
    88. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. doi
    89. (2006). Toward a distinctive ‘Praxiological’ Perspective on ICT-enabled Organizational Innovation.” Paper presented at the Second Organization Studies Workshop on Practice,
    90. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing,” doi
    91. (2009). TripAdvisor cleans out reviews for Fiji resort,” San Francisco Chronicle,
    92. (2009). TripAdvisor Media Network,” Presentation to the MIT Sloan School of Management: Cambridge,
    93. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures.” Organization Science. doi
    94. (2005). Virtual Methods and the Sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific Knowledge,” doi
    95. (2007). Web 2.0 vs. Search Engines: Are Search Engines Becoming Obsolete in the Web 2.0 Frenzy,” Hospitality News,
    96. (1992). Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts,”

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.