Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: an Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice

By Jane Barton, Sarah Currier and Jessie M. N. Hey


This paper challenges some of the assumptions underlying the metadata creation process in the context of two communities of practice, based around learning object repositories and open e-Print archives. The importance of quality assurance for metadata creation is discussed and evidence from the literature, from the practical experiences of repositories and archives, and from related research and practices within other communities is presented. Issues for debate and further investigation are identified, formulated as a series of key research questions. Although there is much work to be done in the area of quality assurance for metadata creation, this paper represents an important first step towards a fuller understanding of the subject.

Topics: EA Metadata
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (2001). Arc - an OAI service provider for Digital Library Federation. doi
    2. (2001). Author-generated Dublin Core Metadata for Web Resources: A Baseline Study in an Organization.
    3. (2003). Automating and evaluating metadata generation. Presented at:
    4. CATRIONA II Final Report.
    5. (2003). Create Change: Challenging the Crisis in Scholarly Communication.
    6. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. doi
    7. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: a new economy of education?
    8. (2003). e-Prints at Southampton.
    9. (2003). GNU EPrints software. doi
    10. (2003). Implementing metadata collection: a project’s problems and solutions.
    11. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. doi
    12. (2003). JISC's Focus on Access to Institutional Resources (FAIR) programme.
    13. (2002). Learner created resources: Bolton Woods. PowerPoint presentation.
    14. (2003). Learning Object Metadata Application Profile. doi
    15. (2001). Learning objects: resources for distance education worldwide. International Review of Research
    16. (2002). Metacrap: putting the torch to seven straw men of the meta-utopia. E-Learning Guru Newsletter.
    17. (2003). Metadata Generation: Processes, People and Tools. doi
    18. (2003). Metadata Initiative. doi
    19. (1998). NCSTRL+: Adding Multi-Discipline and Multi-Genre Support to the Dienst Protocol Using Clusters and Buckets. doi
    20. (2003). Open Archives and UK Institutions: An Overview. D-Lib doi
    21. (2003). Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). doi
    22. (2001). Reclaiming academic output through university archive servers. doi
    23. (2003). RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. doi
    24. (2001). SeSDL Taxonomy Evaluation Report. University of Strathclyde,
    25. (2003). SURF's Digital Academic Repositories (DARE) programme.
    26. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper.
    27. (2003). The Higher Level Skills for Industry Repository. Case Studies
    28. (1997). The Role of Content Analysis in Evaluating Metadata for the US Government Information Locator Service (GILS): results from an exploratory study. doi
    29. (2000). The UPS Prototype: An experimental end-user service across eprint archives. D-Lib doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.