Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Evidence and policy making. The introduction of MMR vaccine in the Netherlands

By S. Blume and J. Tump

Abstract

Based on a case-study of the introduction of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in the Netherlands two decades ago, using documentary and archival sources, this paper examines the way evidence is used in policymaking. Starting from the question of ‘what counts as evidence’, two central claims are developed. First, the decision to introduce MMR was not one but a series of decisions going back at least seven years, over the course of which the significance attached to various forms of evidence changed. Second, results of international studies were coming gradually to be of greater significance than evidence gathered from within the Netherlands itself. These developments had, and continue to have, major consequences for national scientific competences

Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.023
OAI identifier: oai:dare.ubvu.vu.nl:1871/20356
Provided by: DSpace at VU
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/1871/203... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.