Persistent effect of sex ratios on relationship quality and life satisfaction

Abstract

Convict transportation to Australia imposed heavily male-biased sex ratios in some areas, altering the convict-era mating market and generating longrunning cultural effects that persist to the present day. We test whether convict-era sex ratios have altered marital and overall life satisfaction today, through their persistent effects on gender norms and household bargaining. We find that both women and men are happier, and the happiness gap within married couples is smaller in areas where convict-era sex ratios were heavily male-biased than in areas where sex ratios were historically more even. We discuss our results in light of household bargaining theory, evolutionary sexual conflict theory and the well-documented relationship between conservative attitudes and self-reported happiness. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Adult sex ratios and reproductive decisions: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies’

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

UNSWorks

redirect
Last time updated on 10/04/2018

This paper was published in UNSWorks.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.