Location of Repository

Child-centric Information and Communication Technology (ICT)\ud and the fragmentation of child welfare\ud practice in England.

By C. Hall, N. Parton, S. Peckover and S. White


The ways in which government supports families and protects children are always a fine balance. In recent years, we suggest that this balance can be characterised increasingly as ‘child-centric’, less concerned with families and more focused on individual children and their needs. This article charts the changes in families and government responses over the last 40 years, and the way this is reflected in organisational and administrative arrangements. It notes in particular the impact on everyday practice of the introduction of information and communication technologies. Findings are reported from recent research which shows the struggles faced by practitioners who try to manage systems which separate children from their familial, social and relational contexts. As a consequence, we suggest, the work has become increasingly fragmented and less mindful of children's life within families. While the data and analysis draw on research carried out in England, we suggest that similar changes may be going on in other Western liberal democracies

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0047279410000012
OAI identifier: oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:8008

Suggested articles



  1. (2006). An agenda for children: investing in the future or promoting well-being in the present?’,
  2. Chief Secretary to theTreasury (2003),Every Child Matters, Cmnd 5860, London: The Stationery Office.
  3. Children, Schools and Families
  4. Children, Schools and Families [DCSF]
  5. (2007). Children’s Workforce Development Council [CWDC]
  6. (1998). Cohabitation in Britain: not for long, but here to stay’, Paper 81–1,
  7. (1993). Cohabitation, Extra-Marital Childbearing and Social Policy, London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
  8. (2004). Constucting Childhood: Theory, Policy and Social Practice,
  9. (2004). Developing information sharing and assessment systems’,
  10. (2006). Evaluating the common assessment framework and lead professional guidance and implementation
  11. (2007). Families, individuals and the state’,
  12. (1999). Family Fragments? Cambridge: doi
  13. (1989). Growing up in the postmodern age’,
  14. (2000). Health [DH]
  15. (2001). Individualismand IntimateRelations,
  16. (2004). Information outputs for children’s services’, Report of a researchproject commissionedby theDepartment forEducation andSkills and http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded:
  17. (2007). Integrated Children’s System: an evaluation of the practice, process and consequences of the ICS in councils with social services responsibilities’, Report to the Department for Education and Skills/Welsh Assembly Government,
  18. (2011). IP address: child-centric icts 413 Satyamurti,
  19. (1991). Looking After Children: Assessing Outcomes
  20. (1996). Looking After Children: Good Parenting, Good Outcomes Reader,
  21. (2001). Low Income Families in Britain: Work, Welfare and Social Security in 1999, Report No. 138, London: The Stationery Office.
  22. (2000). Narrative and the practice of medicine’,
  23. (1998). Narrative practice and the coherence of personal stories’,
  24. (1998). Office of National Statistics [ONS]
  25. (2009). Performing “initial assessment”: identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services’,
  26. (1968). Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Social Services, Cm 3703, doi
  27. (1988). Secretary of State for Social Services doi
  28. (2005). Sentencing in the Age of Information,
  29. (2008). Social Exclusion Task Force
  30. (1997). Social Work as Narrative: Storytelling and Persuasion in Professional Texts,
  31. (2009). Task Force (2009), ‘First report of the social work task force’, www.dcsf.gov.uk/swtf (accessed 5
  32. (2001). The Critique of Information,
  33. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of theCommonAssessment Form: technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare’, doi
  34. (2008). The Integrated Children’s System: Enhancing Social Work and Inter-Agency Practice,
  35. (2009). The Protection of Children in England; Action Plan. The Government’s Response to Lord Laming, Cm. 7589, London: The Stationery Office.
  36. (2009). The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report, HC 330, London: The Stationery Office.
  37. (2006). Widening our knowledge concerning young looked after children: the case for research using sociological models of childhood’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.