Location of Repository

Digital scholarship considered : how new technologies could transform academic work.

By Nick Pearce, Martin Weller, Eileen Scanlon and Sam Kinsley

Abstract

New digital and web-based technologies are spurring rapid and radical changes across all media industries. These newer models take advantage of the infinite reproducibility of digital media at zero marginal cost. There is an argument to be made that the sort of changes we have seen in other industries will be forced upon higher education, either as the result of external economic factors (the need to be more efficient, responsive, etc.) or by a need to stay relevant to the so-called ‘net generation’ of students (Prensky, 2001; Oblinger & Oblinger, 2005; Tapscott & Williams, 2010).\ud \ud This article discusses the impact of digital technologies on each of Boyer’s dimensions of scholarship: discovery, integration, application and teaching. In each case the use of new technologies brings with it the possibility of new, more open ways of working, although this is not inevitable. The implications of the adoption of new technologies on scholarship are then discussed

Topics: Digital Scholarship, Social Media, Web 2.0
Publisher: University of Regina
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:8072
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2003). 5 of 6Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work | in e... 16/03/2011http://www.ineducation.ca/article/digital-scholarship-considered-how-new-technologies-could-tr...
  2. (2009). ALT-C Keynote Presentation.
  3. (2006). computing: A two-way street to science's future.
  4. (2000). Connecting minds: Computer- mediated communication and scientific work. doi
  5. (2006). Imagining e-science beyond computation. In
  6. (2009). Open isn't so open anymore. Connectivism. Retrieved from http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=198
  7. (2006). Scholarly research and information practices: A domain analytic approach.
  8. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate.
  9. (2009). Signs of epistemic disruption: Transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal.
  10. (2004). The cultural shaping of ICTs within academic fields: Corpus-based linguistics as a case study.
  11. (2009). The golden ratio of OER. Iterating Towards Openness (Blog). Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1146#axzz0nvFUkwxQ Willinsky,
  12. (2007). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources.
  13. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. doi
  14. (1995). The legitimation of academic computing in the 1980s.
  15. (2009). The open scholar. Academic Evolution. Retrieved from http://www.academicevolution.com/2009/08/the-openscholar.html Clow,
  16. (2008). Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory.
  17. (1995). Work and Technology in Higher Education: The social construction of academic computing. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.