Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Modelling corporate tax liabilities using company accounts: a new framework

By Saeed Ahmed


This paper presents a micro-econometric approach to corporate tax modelling. Using firm level panel data of UK companies in three diverse sectors, the paper examines the impact of different variables on corporate tax liabilities of the firms. Many strong results stand out which suggest that firms reduce their tax liabilities through different channels and tax sheltering activities to maximise �after-tax� profits. The evidence shows, inter alia, that not only are trading profits and capital gains important determinants of corporation tax payments but so also are their components, such as gross profit, cost of sales, expenses, and even one-off �exceptional items� and �extraordinary items�. The results also indicate that firms� size, organisational structure, investments, and financial and dividend policies are important factors impacting on corporate tax liabilities. Moreover, different tax reliefs and allowances are strongly associated with corporation tax payments asymmetrically. The findings have implications for microsimulation modelling, financial transparency, and corporate governance

Topics: Classification-JEL: C33, E17, G32, G35, H25, H32, Corporate income tax, panel data, corporate structure, financial and dividend policy, revenue estimation and forecasting, microsimulation modelling
Publisher: Faculty of Economics
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Apollo

Suggested articles


  1. A.(1990), Tax sheltering and the cost of evasion”,
  2. (1995). Alternative Methods of Revenue Forecasting and Estimating”,
  3. (1996). and M.Lang doi
  4. (1994). and Production: the case of doi
  5. (1997). Another look at the low taxable income of foreign-controlled companies
  6. (1994). Corporation tax36 asymmetries and investment: evidence from UK panel data”, doi
  7. (1977). Debt and taxes, doi
  8. (1983). Dividend taxes, corporate investment and Q”, doi
  9. (2002). Do Countries Compete over Corporate Tax Rates?”, doi
  10. (1999). Do personal taxes affect corporate financing decisions? doi
  11. (1990). Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions?” doi
  12. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, doi
  13. (2000). Ferreting Out Tunnelling: An Application to Indian Business Groups”, NBER Working Paper No.7952. doi
  14. (1994). Fiscal paradise: foreign tax havens and American business”, doi
  15. (1992). Handbook on Taxation,
  16. (1997). How much do taxes38 discourage incorporation?” doi
  17. (1993). Income shifting in US multinational corporations”, doi
  18. (1982). Inflation, tax rules and investment: some econometric evidence”, doi
  19. (1997). International income shifting by US multinational corporations”, doi
  20. (1976). Intra-firm royalties crossing frontiers and transfer pricing behaviour,” doi
  21. (1992). Investment and Tobin’s Q: evidence from company panel data”, doi
  22. (2002). Issues surrounding developments in business sector modelling and policy advice and construction of a multi-source database
  23. (1996). Microsimulation for direct taxes and fiscal policy in the United Kingdom” in A. Harding (ed), Microsimulation and Public Policy,
  24. (2000). Modelling Corporation Tax in the United Kingdom”, doi
  25. (2001). Modelling the Tax Burden (Direct and
  26. (1990). Multinational Corporations, transfer pricing, and taxes: evidence from the US petroleum industry”, doi
  27. (1987). Recent developments in the Theory of Corporate Finance”, doi
  28. (1999). Revenue forecasting and Estimation”, doi
  29. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, doi
  30. (1998). Tax Modelling for Economies in Transition”, doi
  31. (2001). Tax Modelling” doi
  32. (1992). Tax policy and business fixed environment in the United States”, doi
  33. (1983). Tax Policy and investment in major US macroeconometric model models”,
  34. (1996). Tax Policy and the activities of multinational corporations”, NBER, Working paper 5589. doi
  35. (1996). Tax Reform to Promote Investment”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, doi
  36. (2001). Taxation and Corporate Financial Policy”, doi
  37. (1981). Taxation and corporate investment: a Q-theory approach”, doi
  38. (1975). Taxation of multinational corporations: the case of the United States petroleum industry”, doi
  39. (1973). Taxation, corporate financial policy and the cost of capital”, doi
  40. (1996). Taxes and the division of foreign operating income among royalties, interest, dividends, and retained earnings”, doi
  41. (1991). Taxes, tariffs and transfer pricing in multinational corporate decision making”, doi
  42. (1996). The Corporation Tax”, doi
  43. (1996). The effect of under forecasting on the accuracy of revenue forecasts by state governments“, doi
  44. (2002). The Impact of Corporate Taxation on the Location of Capital : A Review”, doi
  45. The ineffectiveness of effective tax rates on business investment: a critique of Feldstein’s Fisher-Schultz Lecture”, doi
  46. (1998). The Inland Revenue Model for Forecasting Corporation Tax in the United Kingdom”, doi
  47. (1999). The Role of Micro-simulation in the reform of corporation tax in the United Kingdom, 1997-99”, UK Inland Revenue, Analytical Services Division, Review Paper.
  48. (2000). Transfer Pricing and income shifting in integrating economies”
  49. (2000). Tunnelling,” American Economic Review Papers and doi
  50. (1984). Which effective tax rate?”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.