Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The personal created through dialogue: enhancing possibilities through the use of new media

By Sue Clegg, Alison Hudson and Andy Mitchell


This paper explores the relationships between a number of different developments in higher education pedagogy, which are subsumed under the broad heading of progress files. The overall concern of the paper is to explore the ways in which personal reflection and learning is enhanced through dialogue. The paper explores the ways learners engage in dialogue in two environments that use different aspects of digital technologies to support the development of portfolios. The findings from the case studies point to the ways in which different technologies facilitated personal reflection mediated through sharing and dialogue. We develop the idea of affordances as a relationship whereby the learner is involved in a purposeful engagement with the possibilities created by their environment. The affordance of digitised technologies in supporting dialogue is, therefore, conceptualised in relation to the characteristics of the learner, not as a simple technology relation

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776042000339763
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). Understanding as the transformation of what is already known, doi
  2. (2000). What does electronic conferencing afford distance education?, doi
  3. (1998). The effectiveness of personal development planning, doi
  4. (2003). Utilising reflective practice interviews in professional development, doi
  5. (2004). Critical readings: Progress files and the production of the autonomous learner, Teaching doi
  6. (2002). Reflecting or acting? Reflective practice and continuing professional development in the UK higher education, Reflective Practice, doi
  7. (2003). The emperor’s new clothes: globalisation and e-learning, doi
  8. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies, doi
  9. (2000). Globalisation and pedagogy: space, place and identity doi
  10. (1989). Truth and method (London, Sheed and Ward).
  11. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception doi
  12. (2003). A systematic map and synthesis review of the effectiveness of personal development planning for improving student learning (London, EPPI-Centre, Social Sciences Research Unit).
  13. (2002). Holding complexity and searching for meaning—teaching as reflective practice, doi
  14. (2002). Orchestrating interdependence in a multinational virtual learning community, paper presented at doi
  15. (2000). Action learning and action research: improving the quality of teaching and learning (London, doi
  16. (1999). Towards a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration, in: doi
  17. (1988). Cognition in practice (Cambridge, doi
  18. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice, doi
  19. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation (Cambridge, doi
  20. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: a review. Available online at: clnet/clnetreport.html (accessed 13
  21. (2004). Words bridges and dialogue: issues of audience and addressivity in online communication, in:
  22. (2003). Electronic portfolios for design and technology,
  23. (2001). Quality Assurance Agency doi
  24. (2005). University (no date) International Masters Programme in E-Learning Multimedia and Consultancy. Available online at: (accessed 14
  25. (2000). Affordances and events, doi
  26. (1976). Case studies in the evaluation of educational programmes (OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation).
  27. (1994). Guidelines or aesthetics: design learning strategies, doi
  28. (1999). Conscious reflection and implicit learning in teacher preparation, Part 2: implications for a balanced approach, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.