Location of Repository

INQUIRE: a case study in evaluating the potential of online MCQ tests in a discursive subject

By Sophie Clarke, Katharine Lindsay, Chris McKenna and Steve New

Abstract

There has been a wealth of investigation into the use of online multiple-choice questions as a means of summative assessment, however the research into the use of formative MCQs by the same mode of delivery still remains patchy. Similarly, research and implementation has been largely concentrated within the Sciences and Medicine rather than the more discursive subjects within the Humanities and Social Sciences. The INQUIRE (Interactive Questions Reinforcing Education) Evaluation Project was jointly conducted by two groups at the University of Oxford-the Said Business School and the Academic Computing Development Team to evaluate the use of online MCQs as a mechanism to reinforce and extend student learning. This initial study used a small set of highly focused MCQ tests that were designed to complement an introductory series of first-year undergraduate management lectures. MCQ is a simple and well-established technology, and hence the emphasis was very much on situating the tests within the student experience. The paper will cover how the online MCQs are intended to fit into the Oxford Undergraduate study agenda, and how a simple evaluation was executed and planned to investigate their usage and impact. The chosen method of evaluation was to combine focus groups with automated online methods of tracking, and the paper discusses the findings of both of these

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, LC1022 - 1022.25 Computer-assisted Education
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1080/0968776042000259564
OAI identifier: oai:generic.eprints.org:610/core5

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1998). A computer-based formative a strategy for a basic statistics model, doi
  2. (2001). Academic approaches and attitudes towards CAA: a qualitative study,
  3. (1996). Assessment 2000: towards a pluralistic approach to assessment, in: M. Birenbaum & F. Douchy (Eds) Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge doi
  4. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques (2nd edn)
  5. (1998). Computer based assessment (Vol 2): case studies in science and computing (University of Plymouth,
  6. (1997). Computer-based learning and assessment: a palaeontological case study with outcomes and implications, doi
  7. (1996). Evaluation of health assessment skills using a computer videodisc interactive programme,
  8. (1998). Evaluation of learning technology implementation, in: N. Mogey (Ed.) Evaluation studies (Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative). Available online at: http:// www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/evalstudies/esevalimp.pdf
  9. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research doi
  10. (1998). Formative assessment in basic geographical statistics module, in: D. Charman & A. Elmes (Eds) Computer based assessment (Vol 2): case studies in science and computing (University of Plymouth,
  11. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data, methods for analysing talk, text, interaction doi
  12. (2001). Introducing computers into the assessment process: what is the impact upon academic practice?
  13. (1999). Student perceptions of the learning benefits of computer-assisted assessment: a case study in electronic engineering, in:
  14. (1996). The introduction of computer-based testing on an engineering technology course, Assessment and Evaluation doi
  15. (1998). The LTDI evaluation cookbook (Glasgow, Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative).
  16. (2000). Usability engineering doi
  17. (1999). Using CAA for formative assessment, in:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.