Article thumbnail

The London Position Statement of the World Congress of Gastroenterology on Biological Therapy for IBD With the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization: When to Start, When to Stop, Which Drug to Choose, and How to Predict Response

By Geert R. D'Haens, Remo Panaccione, Peter D. R. Higgins, Severine Vermeire, Miquel Gassull, Yehuda Chowers, Stephen B. Hanauer, Hans Herfarth, Daan W. Hommes, Michael Kamm, Robert Löfberg, A. Quary, Bruce Sands, A. Sood, G. Watermayer, Bret Lashner, Marc Lémann, Scott Plevy, Walter Reinisch, Stefan Schreiber, Corey Siegel, Stephen Targan, M. Watanabe, Brian Feagan, William J. Sandborn, Jean Frédéric Colombel and Simon Travis

Abstract

The advent of biological therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. Nonetheless, not all patients require biological therapy. Selection of patients depends on clinical characteristics, previous response to other medical therapy, and comorbid conditions. Availability, reimbursement guidelines, and patient preferences guide the choice of first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohn's disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) has the most extensive clinical trial data, but other biological agents (adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), and natalizumab (NAT)) appear to have similar benefits in CD. Steroid-refractory, steroid-dependent, or complex fistulizing CD are indications for starting biological therapy, after surgical drainage of any sepsis. For fistulizing CD, the efficacy of IFX for inducing fistula closure is best documented. Unique risks of NAT account for its labeling as a second-line biological agent in some countries. Patients who respond to induction therapy benefit from systematic re-treatment. The combination of IFX with azathioprine is better than monotherapy for induction of remission and mucosal healing up to 1 year in patients who are naive to both agents. Whether this applies to other agents remains unknown. IFX is also effective for treatment-refractory, moderate, or severely active ulcerative colitis. Patients who have a diminished or loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may respond to dose adjustment of the same agent or switching to another agent. Careful consideration should be given to the reasons for loss of response. There are insufficient data to make recommendations on when to stop anti-TNF therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission for > 1 year, without signs of active inflammation can remain in remission after stopping treatmen

Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1038/ajg.2010.392
OAI identifier:
Provided by: NARCIS
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 (external link)
  • https://pure.amc.nl/ws/oai (external link)
  • https://pure.amc.nl/en/publica... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.