Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Covariance structural models of the relationship between the design and customer domains

By Marin D. Guenov

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of modelling and mapping of difficult to quantify customer needs to technical requirements and subsequently to design parameters. Proposed is a covariance structural equation model, which incorporates a confirmatory and a structural component. The former is used for the decomposition of the qualitative customer needs, modelled as latent variables, onto a generally larger number of measurable technical requirements. The structural component maps the technical requirements to design parameters. The concept is illustrated by an example. The model is confined to the linear dependence between the variables, but in general the approach can handle a number of non-linear relations through variable transformation. The conclusion is that the proposed synthetic procedure, named SEMDES (Structural Equation Models for the Design of Engineering Systems) represents a sufficiently rich and generic structure capable of bridging the gap between the customer and the design domains

Topics: Covariance structural equation models, Axiomatic design, Quality engineering, Requirements engineering
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2008
DOI identifier: 10.1080/09544820701213378
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3043
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A Roadmap for Decomposition: Activities, Theories, and Tools for System Design.
  2. (1992). Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, doi
  3. (2004). An Integrated Latent Variable Choice Modeling Approach for Enhancing Product Demand Modeling, doi
  4. (1988). Analysing Decision Making. Metric Conjoint Analysis, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences,
  5. (1998). Another Look at How Toyota Integrates Product Development. Harvard Business Review,
  6. (2005). Application of Axiomatic Design and Design Structure Matrix to the Decomposition of Engineering System, doi
  7. (2001). Axiomatic Design. Advances and Applications, doi
  8. (2002). Complexity and Cost Effectiveness Measures for Systems Design, In
  9. (2000). Computing the Information Content of Decoupled Designs, Research in Engineering Design, doi
  10. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. A Preface to LISREL, doi
  11. Covariance Structure Models. An Introduction to LISREL, 1983-b (Sage Publications: doi
  12. (1988). D.,The House of Quality,
  13. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments, doi
  14. (1998). Document ML00800,
  15. (2003). Enhancing Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decisoin-Based Design, doi
  16. Ford Motor Company’s Investment Efficiency Initiative: A Case Study. doi
  17. (2001). Forecasting with Conjoint Analysis, in Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, edited by J.S. Armstrong, doi
  18. (2000). Improving Systems by Combining Axiomatic Design, Quality Control Tools and Designed Experiments, Research in Engineering Design, doi
  19. (1975). KJ Method: a Scientific Approach to Problem Solving,
  20. (1998). Latent Variable Models. An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Analysis, doi
  21. (2001). LISREL 8: Users’s Reference Guide,
  22. (1947). Multiple-factor Analysis. A development and Expansion of the Vectors of Mind, doi
  23. (1999). Processes for Engineering a System,
  24. (1993). Quality by Design.
  25. (1995). Quality Function Deployment. How to Make QFD Work for You., doi
  26. (1988). Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences,
  27. (1993). Seeing the Voice of The Customer: The Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation
  28. The Essentials of Factor Analysis,1999 doi
  29. (1997). The Language Processing Method. A Tool for Organising Qualitative Data and Creating Insight, Document ML0060,
  30. (1990). The Principles of Design,
  31. (1920). The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment doi
  32. (1991). Top Ten Triumphs and Tragedies of Genichi Taguchi, Quality Engineering, doi
  33. (1974). W., The Study of Behaviour: Q-technique and its Methodology,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.