Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Development of an open source web-based infrastructure for designing medical devices

By Kenneth Mortimer

Abstract

The term ‘Open Source’ is commonly associated with software due to its proven success, encompassing a user’s ability to review and modify the underlying source code, to disseminate modified or unmodified versions to others, and to use it without facing the prospect of legal repercussions (Siedlok, 2001). In the context of product design, namely medical device design, the concept remains relatively novel with no prior research being reported. A study of applying the open source concept to medical device design by developing a web based infrastructure for its facilitation is reported here. Results: The stakeholder requirements are captured using a semi-structured questionnaire and validated through cross referencing responses to questions with other responses from stakeholders of the same or similar occupation. The most prominent responses are selected as the key stakeholder requirements and utilised in conjunction with the functional system requirements outlined in the System Requirements Specification (SyRS), both sets of requirements provide the foundation for the open source web based infrastructure development. Conclusion: The comprehensiveness of the requirements indicate that the open source web based infrastructure will support the design of all medical devices that are classified as high risk, medium risk or low risk devices, whilst devices external to this scope remain a future certainty

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/6574
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). 155 – 173. Available from: DOI: 10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7 [Accessed 15 th
  2. (1994). A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation. doi
  3. (2009). About Us [Online]. Available from:
  4. (1995). Atheism, sex and databases: the net as a social technology. In:
  5. (2009). Available from: http://lwn.net/Articles/17369/
  6. (2004). Back to the user. Software, doi
  7. (2000). Building and sustaining communities of practice: Final report. American Productivity and Quality Centre Report.
  8. (2002). Cave or community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. Available from: http://opensource.mit.edu [Accessed 29 th
  9. (2007). Collaborative Design In
  10. (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. doi
  11. (1998). Computer mediated communications and international communities of practice.
  12. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. doi
  13. (1996). Computerization movements and tales of technological utopianism. doi
  14. (2005). Construction of an Evaluation Model for Free/Open Source Project Hosting Sites. PhD Thesis.
  15. (2005). Cooking-pot markets and balanced value flows.
  16. (1996). Creativity in context. doi
  17. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving. doi
  18. (2007). Crowdsourcing: Harnessing the Wisdom of the Crowd. The
  19. (2006). DesignWorld: A multidisciplinary collaborative design environment using agents in a virtual world, In: doi
  20. (1987). Discretionary data bases: a theory and some experimental findings. doi
  21. (2008). Dynamic Perspectives on Social Characteristics and Sustainability in Online Community Networks. Systems Dynamics Review. doi
  22. (2009). Electronics
  23. (2007). Emerging Free and Open Sofrware Practices. doi
  24. (2002). Entrepreneurial evaluation of open source software. An online-survey carried out by the University of Dortmund
  25. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. doi
  26. (1998). FM Interview with Linus Torvalds: What Motivates Free Software Developers? doi
  27. (2005). Free and open source software communities as a support mechanism.
  28. (2000). Free for all: How Linux and the free software movement undercut the high-tech titans.
  29. (2002). Free/libre open source software: Survey and study, Use of open source software in firms and public institution,
  30. (2002). GForge: possible renaissance for open-source SourceForge.
  31. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. doi
  32. (1998). Groupware and teamwork in R&D: limits to learning and innovation. doi
  33. (2004). Hacking alome? The effects of online and offline participation on open source community leadership. Available from: http://opensource.mit.edu [Accessed 29 th
  34. (2008). Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: Tensions and Controversies in the Field. doi
  35. (2009). How MySpace Works?
  36. (2001). Innovation by user communities: Learning from opensource software.
  37. (2001). Intrinsic motivation in a new light. doi
  38. (2000). It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Strategic Information Systems. doi
  39. (1998). Knowledge research issues.
  40. (2005). Knowledge sharing in an emerging network of practice: the role of a knowledge portal. doi
  41. (2009). List of social networking sites.
  42. (2002). Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration. doi
  43. (2001). Management & decentralised Virtual Structures. The Case of the Linux Project. [Online]. Available from: www.firstmonday.org
  44. (1999). Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. doi
  45. (1990). Managing Technologically Innovative Team Efforts Toward New Product Success, doi
  46. (1994). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. doi
  47. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: cooperation and154 conflict in computer communities. doi
  48. (2009). Medical device [Online]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_device [Accessed
  49. (2003). Microsoft vs. Linux: Gaining traction.
  50. (2004). Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age.
  51. (2003). Online communities: A longitudal analysis of communication activities. doi
  52. (2006). Open Source Science: A New Model for Innovation. Harvard Business School,
  53. (2001). Open Source Software Development. doi
  54. (1999). Open Source Software: A Grassroots Development Model.
  55. (2001). Open-source software development and distributed innovation. doi
  56. (2001). Open-source software: A guideline for small and middle-sized enterprises. 1 st edition. German Federal Ministry for Economy and Technology.
  57. (2005). Producing Open Source Software: How to Run a Successful Free Software Project.
  58. (2009). Rapid application development. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapid_application_development [Accessed
  59. (2001). Rebel code: Inside Linux and the open source revolution. doi
  60. (1996). Redefining New Product Development Teams: Learning to Actualise Consumer Contributions, doi
  61. (1992). Revolutionising Product Development.
  62. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. doi
  63. (2003). The Art of UNIX Programming.
  64. (2003). The big project that never ends: Role and task negotiation within an emerging occupational community. Unpublished recent summary of findings, as part of PHD Research, University of Albany. Available from: http://opensource.mit.edu
  65. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technologies, Culture and Deviance at NASA. doi
  66. (2003). The construction of meaning through vital engagement. doi
  67. (2003). The contribution of free software to software evolution. doi
  68. (2008). The Future of Social Networking Sites. Mcafee Security Journal [Online]. Available from: http://www.mcafee.com/us/local_content/misc/threat_center/msj_future_social_n etworking.pdf [Accessed:
  69. (2001). The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. doi
  70. (1971). The Haven-finding Art: A History of Navigation from159 Odysseus to Captain Cook, Hollis & Carter, doi
  71. (2001). The internet as a diverse community: Cultural, organizational and political issues. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, doi
  72. (2003). The knowledge ecology of open source software projects. Paper presented at seminar on ICTs in the Contemporary World, LSE Department of Information Systems.
  73. (1995). The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering, nd editon, 20 th anniversary edition.
  74. (1995). The reality of virtual communities.
  75. (1988). The sources of innovation. doi
  76. (2007). The Virtual Brand Footprint: The Marketing Opportunity In Second Life.
  77. (2000). The virtual community. doi
  78. (1997). Transnational virtual community? Exploring implications for culture, power and language. doi
  79. (2008). Understanding Development and Usage of Social Networking Sites: The Social Performance Model. In: Pace University, New Jersey Institute of Technology: doi
  80. (2007). Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software [Online]. Available from: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-thepoint.html [Accessed 02nd
  81. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education.
  82. (2002). Working for free? Motivations for participating in opensource projects. doi
  83. (2006). Your Second Life? Goodwill and performativity of intellectual property in online gaming. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.