Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A framework for integrating flood defence and biodiversity in washlands in England

By Joe Morris and Tim M. Hess

Abstract

Concerns about increased flood risk and loss of biodiversity in lowland areas, coupled with changing priorities in the countryside have drawn attention to the potential contribution that managed washlands can make to improved flood management, habitats and wildlife. Following a review of research literature, a survey of flood managers and conservation officers, and an evaluation of selected case sites in England, a framework to help integrate potential flood management and biodiversity opportunities was constructed. This framework consists of three components, namely: a Hydraulic classification which categorises washlands according to degree of hydraulic control; a Habitat classification which captures attributes of washland hydrology that define the type of existing or potential habitats; and, a Menu of Interventions to “engineer” or manage particular flooding and soil wetness regimes and thereby better exploit habitat potential. Washlands were also categorised by main type of benefit whether this is flood management, conservation, or in the case of integratedwashland, a balance of the two. The advantages of alternative administrative and funding arrangements for washlands, whether land acquisition or annual payment to existing land owners, were also explored. It was concluded that the classification of washland flooding and water level regimes can help to define habitat potential. It can also help to guide hydraulic engineering and management actions that can be taken to realise this potential. Although there is potential synergy between flooding and biodiversity under some flood regimes, biodiversity benefits mainly depend on the management of water regimes following flood events. There is a clear need to “join up” hitherto fragment

Topics: flood defence, biodiversity, washlands, floodplains
Publisher: Jrbm
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/1965
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003).“ExtremeFloodingEventsontheRhineandtheSurvival and Distribution of Riparian Plant doi
  2. (1990). A Model to Predict and Assess the Effects of Groundwater Withdrawal on the Vegetation in the Pleistocene Areas of The Netherlands,” doi
  3. (2002). A Typology for the Classification, Description and ValuationA framework for integrating flood defence and biodiversity in washlands in
  4. (1992). Agricultural Land Drainage, Land Use ChangeandEconomicPerformance:ExperienceintheUK,” Land Use Policy, doi
  5. and Roozen,C.(2002).“RestorationStrategiesforRiverFloodplainsAlong Large Lowland Rivers in doi
  6. (1982). Autumn and Winter Feeding Ecology ofWaterfowl at the OuseWashes,
  7. (1994). Building a new approach to the investigation and assessment of wetland ecosystem functioning,
  8. (2004). Department for Environment, Food and RuralAffairs and NationalAssembly for
  9. (2002). Economic Basis and Practicalities of Washland Creation on the Somerset Levels and Moors. Report to Wise Use of Floodplain Project,
  10. (2004). Economic Dimensions of Washland Creation in England: a Case from Somerset,” doi
  11. (2004). English Rural Development Plan: Agrienvironment Schemes Environmental. Department for Environment,FoodandRuralAffairs,London,http://www.defra. gov.uk/erdp/schemes/, accessed
  12. (1988). Estimating the Value of Flood Alleviation doi
  13. (1999). European Wet Grassland: Guidelines for Management and Restoration. doi
  14. (2002). Farming and Food’s Contribution to Sustainable Development. Economic and Statistical Analysis. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
  15. (1999). Flood and Coastal Defence Project Appraisal Guidance: Economic Appraisal (FCDPAG3). MAFF (now Defra)
  16. (2002). Food and RuralAffairs and Forestry Commission
  17. Foresight Flood and Coastal Defence Project: An Analysis of Future Risk of Flooding and Coastal Erosion for the UK Between 2030–2100. Office of ScienceandTechnology,
  18. (1964). Hydrology of Flow Control. Part III. Reservoir Regulation.
  19. (2004). Integrated Washland Management for Flood Management and Biodiversity. English Nature Research Report Number 598, English Nature,
  20. (2004). Is Tolerance to Summer Flooding Correlated with Distribution Patterns in River Floodplains?” A comparative study of 20 terrestrial grassland species, doi
  21. Making Space for Water: Developing A New Government Strategy for Flood and Coastal Erosion RiskManagementInEngland.DepartmentforEnvironment, Food and RuralAffairs.
  22. (2001). New Oxford Dictionary of English. doi
  23. (1984). Plant Zonation on Lakeshores in doi
  24. (2000). Reconciling Agricultural Economic and Environmental Objectives: The Case of Recreating Wetlands in the Fenland Area of Eastern England,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, doi
  25. Risk and Policy Analysis,
  26. (2004). Single Farm Payment Scheme. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/capreform/ singlepay/overview/, accessed
  27. (1997). The Benefits and Costs Analysis of River
  28. (1994). The New Rivers and Wildlife Handbook.
  29. (2004). The water framework directive and flood management – a missed opportunity?
  30. (1994). The Water-Regime Requirements of Lowland Wet-grassland Plants. Report to Ministry ofAgriculture, Fisheries and Food, Flood and Coastal Defence Division,
  31. (1997). The Wet Grassland Guide: Managing Floodplain And Coastal Wet Grasslands For Wildlife.
  32. (2002). TheWater Regime Requirements and the Response to Hydrological Change of Grassland Plant Communities. Project BD1310. Final Report to Department for Environment, Food and RuralAffairs,
  33. (2003). UK Biodiversity Website.
  34. (2002). Use of Floodplains doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.