Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using stochastic dynamic programming to support weed management decisions over a rotation

By L. R. Benjamin, A. E. Milne, P. J. W. Lutman, David J. Parsons, J. Cussans and J. Storkey


This study describes a model that predicts the impact of weed management on the population dynamics of arable weeds over a rotation and presents the economic consequences. A stochastic dynamic programming optimisation is applied to the model to identify the management strategy that maximises gross margin over the rotation. The model and dynamic programme were developed for the weed management decision support system -'Weed Manager'. Users can investigate the effect of management practices (crop, sowing time, weed control and cultivation practices) on their most important weeds over the rotation or use the dynamic programme to evaluate the best theoretical weed management strategy. Examples of the output are given in this paper, along with discussion on their validation. Through this study, we demonstrate how biological models can (i) be integrated into a decision framework and (ii) deliver valuable weed management guidance to users

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00678.x
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles


  1. (1986). A model of the economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat. doi
  2. (1990). A model of the effects of cultivation on the verticaldistribution of weed seeds within the soil. doi
  3. (2009). A model to simulate the growth, development and competitive effect of weeds in a winter wheat crop for use in a weed management decision support system. doi
  4. (1985). A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. doi
  5. (2003). Application of decision-support software for postemergence weed control. doi
  6. (2002). Arable Crops in Great Britain 2002. Pesticide Usage Survey Report 187, 108pp DEFRA,
  7. (1981). Biological flora of the British Isles.
  8. (2006). Development and validation of Weed Management Support System (Weed Manager). HGCA project report 388, pp127,
  9. (1960). Dynamic programming and Markov processes.
  10. (2005). Effects on weed and invertebrate abundance and diversity of herbicide management in genetically modified herbicide-tolerant winter-sown oilseed rape. doi
  11. (1986). Einfluss der grundbodenarbeitung auf die verunkrautung – ein beitrag zur prognose der verunkrautung
  12. (2003). HADSSTM, Pocket HERBTM and WebHADSSTM: decision aids for field crops.
  13. (1989). Long term studies of weed populations in winter wheat as affected by straw disposal, tillage and herbicide use.
  14. (2002). Long-term modelling of weed control strategies: analysis of threshold-based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities. doi
  15. (1986). Modelling the economics of controlling Avena fatua in winter wheat. doi
  16. (1995). Optimising weed management using stochastic dynamic programming to take account of uncertain herbicide performance. doi
  17. (1997). Predicting yield loss due to interference from two weed species using early observations of relative weed leaf area. doi
  18. (1995). Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 9.7 years of burial in Alaska. doi
  19. (1990). The biology of weeds. Weed control handbook: principles.
  20. (1999). The population dynamics of Anisantha sterilis in winter wheat: comparative demography and the role of management. doi
  21. (1990). The seed cycle of Alopecurus myosuroides in winter cereals: a quantitative analysis. Symposium on integrated weed management in cereals.
  22. (2003). The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective.
  23. (2004). WeedSOFTReg.: a weed management decision support system.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.