Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An Improved Method of Failure Mode Analysis for Design Changes

By R. Laurenti and H. Rozenfeld

Abstract

Customers and market changes behaviour are a large part of the product creation and modification. Though, design changes introduce new potential failures into the products. In this paper, it is presented an integrated method which turns attention to the analysis of design changes. The method is based on FMEA and DRBFM methods, and on remarks from four focused interviews. The interviews showed the necessity of a structured process of managing engineering changes, multidisciplinary work, empowerment of responsibilities, committed personnel and understanding of the modifications. Yet, further work must be undertaken to assess and validate the novel method.Organised by: Cranfield UniversityMori Seiki – The Machine Tool Compan

Topics: Failure Analysis, Design Changes, FMEA, DRBFM
Publisher: Cranfield University Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3668
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). An Improved FMEA Methodology, doi
  2. (2001). Aspects of a Better Understanding of
  3. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, doi
  4. (2007). Design Process Error Proofing: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of the Design Process, doi
  5. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research, doi
  6. (1996). Diagnostic Modelling and Diagnosability Evaluation of Mechanical Systems, doi
  7. (2005). DRBFM - die Toyota Methode,
  8. (1988). Efficient analysis for FMEA, doi
  9. (2005). Entwicklung mit System: Wie Toyota von
  10. (1995). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution, doi
  11. (1995). Failure Mode Effect Analysis: A Practical Application of Functional Modelling, doi
  12. (1991). FMECA, The Right Way, doi
  13. Im Fluss: Wie Toyota von
  14. (2001). Innovation in the Tension of Change and Reuse,
  15. (2007). Keine Angst vor Änderungen! Robustes Design für Innovative Produkte, Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit,
  16. (1996). Knowledge-based Support of System Analysis for the Analysis of Failure Modes and Effects, doi
  17. (2005). Linking Product Functionality to Historic Failures to Improve Failure Analysis in Design, doi
  18. (2007). Motor vehicle recalls: Trends, patterns and emerging issues, doi
  19. (2001). Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems that Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement, doi
  20. (2004). Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design, doi
  21. (1996). Product Reliability and Firm Value: The Experience of American and Japanese Automakers, doi
  22. (1997). Quantitative FMEA Automation, doi
  23. (2003). Reliability Problem Prevention Method for Automotive Components - doi
  24. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oaks, doi
  25. (1990). Research Methods, doi
  26. (1992). Research Notes and Communications: The Effect of Product Recall Announcements on Shareholder Wealth, doi
  27. (1993). Technical Market Research: Get Customers to Collaborate in Developing Products, Long Range Planning, doi
  28. (1995). The Flame System: Automating Electrical Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), doi
  29. (2006). The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. doi
  30. (2004). The Role of Volition in Organizational Learning: The Case of Automotive Product Recalls, doi
  31. (2001). Using Bayes Belief Networks in Industrial FMEA Modelling and Analysis, doi
  32. (1992). Using Causal Reasoning for Automated Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.