Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Marketing, Existential Malpractice and an Etherised Discipline: A Soteriological Comment.

By Malcolm McDonald

Abstract

This paper reviews the state of marketing theory and practice. A early reviewer of this paper was inclined to "criticise the title on the grounds of obscurity", but concluded it would do as it was. In an academic culture in which the average journal contents page is hardly less obfuscatory, our attempt at irony in the title and introduction seems to have been insufficiently extreme to make our point, which is that marketing academia talks esoterically to itself, even in journals such as this which aim to have a dual practitioner and academic audience. We discuss how this has left consultants as serial fad peddlers, perhaps with more influence but delivering dubious genuine benefit. The result is that marketing practice shows few signs of improving over time. We discuss the vital choices that need to be made in the nature and process of marketing if it is to reach out of its functional silo to seize the heart of the organisation

Publisher: Westburn Publishers
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1362/026725704323080461
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3274
Provided by: Cranfield CERES
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1976). Business School Graffiti – a Decennial Transcript’,
  2. (2000). Defining a Marketing Paradigm – the view of senior non-marketers’, Academy of Marketing Conference,
  3. (1998). Even More Offensive Marketing’, doi
  4. (2000). How Shareholder Value Analysis Re-Defines Marketing’, Market Leader, Spring,
  5. (1982). In Search of Excellent’,
  6. (1990). Managing on the Edge’, Simon and Schuster, doi
  7. (1997). Market Segmentation: Organisational Archetypes and Research Agendas’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.