Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Feeling secure or being secure? Why it can seem better not to protect yourself against a natural hazard

By Tim Harries

Abstract

This article presents qualitative research in flood risk areas of England that suggests that the desire to feel secure can sometimes deter people from taking actions that would reduce the actual physical damage of a hazardous natural event. That is, it argues that people sometimes put what Giddens calls their ontological security above their physical security. Preferring to think of their homes as places that are innately safe, they reject the idea of defending them; preferring to think of nature as a positive moral force, they hesitate to view it as a source of real danger; and preferring to think of society as a competent protector of last resort, they are reluctant to accept the need to protect themselves. Being central to ontological security, such social representations (of �home�, �nature�, �society� etc.) are defended by avoiding perceptual shifts and behaviours that might challenge them. This paper discusses how and why they are defended, what happens when they become indefensible and why some householders and groups of householders are more willing than others to take self-protective actions against risks such as flooding

Topics: psychology, sociology, communication
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.kingston.ac.uk:18064

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance
  2. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation,
  3. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar
  4. (1990). An introduction to the social identity approach (Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf).
  5. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
  6. (2003). Banbury and Kidlington Four Years after the Floods: An Examination of the Long-Term Health Effects of Flooding
  7. (2000). Disaster Preparedness: Relationships among Private Experience, Personal Characteristics, and Distress, doi
  8. (1993). Discourse analysis and social representations, in:
  9. (2002). Discourse analysis and the study of policy making, European Political Sciences,
  10. (1983). Educational Programs and Human Response to Natural Hazards, doi
  11. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language (London,
  12. (2005). Fear versus fascination: An exploration of emotional responses to natural threats, doi
  13. (1999). Flood Fatalities in Australia,
  14. (2004). Flood Risks to People, Phase 2: Inception Report,
  15. (2000). Flooding and Human Health: The dangers posed are not always obvious,
  16. (2002). Floods: Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies for Human Health, Meeting report (Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe).
  17. (2004). Foresight. Future Flooding. Scientific Summary: Volume I. Future risks and their drivers.
  18. (1962). Hazard and Choice Perception in
  19. (1998). Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security,
  20. (2000). Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard: a Review of Research,
  21. (2008). Householder responses to flood risk: The consequences of the search for ontological security. PhD Thesis.
  22. (1962). How to do Things with Words (Oxford,
  23. (2000). Introduction and Overview, in: P. SLOVIC (Ed) The Perception of Risk doi
  24. (1961). La Psychanalyse: Son Image et son Public (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).
  25. (1975). Logic and conversation,
  26. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge,
  27. (1988). On Humour: Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society (Oxford,
  28. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not,
  29. (1958). Philosophical Investigations doi
  30. (1995). Risk (London,
  31. (2004). Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality, Risk Analysis, doi
  32. (1988). Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes
  33. (1974). Space and place: Humanistic perspective,
  34. (1993). Studying the thinking society: social representations, rhetoric and attitudes,
  35. (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously (Albany,
  36. (2003). Thames Gateway and Flood Risk Management – A Preliminary Assessment (London, Environment Agency).
  37. (2004). The Appraisal of Human-Related Intangible Impacts of Flooding
  38. (1998). The consequences of doing nothing: Inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. doi
  39. (1976). The Effect of Flood Damage on Land Use Planning,
  40. (2001). The Health and Social Effects of the
  41. (2006). The Health Effects of Flooding: Social Research Results from England and Wales,
  42. (1976). The house as symbol of the self,
  43. (1983). The idea of calamity in a technocratic age, in: K. HEWITT (Ed) Interpretations of Calamity: From the Viewpoint of Human Ecology (London:
  44. (1991). The idea of home: a kind of space,
  45. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. doi
  46. (1999). The Nature of Laughter
  47. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations, in: R. FARR AND S. MOSCOVICI (Eds) Social Representations (Cambridge, doi
  48. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse (Oxford,
  49. (1995). Towards a Sociology of

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.