Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do changes in organisational status affect financial performance?

By David Parker

Abstract

School of Managemen

Year: 1990
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/399
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1986). Analysis of the Government’s Case’, doi
  2. (1964). De Eccugmics of Discretiona!
  3. (1977). DisqWQfnt!nn Marriage: a studv of the ~0s from merger,
  4. (1988). Government Hobart Paper 109, Institute of Economic Affairs,
  5. (1979). Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Financial Ratio Analysis‘, doi
  6. (1985). Is the ?rivate Sector More Efficient? A study in th public v private debate’,
  7. (1971). Modelling a Financial Ratios Categoric Framework’, doi
  8. (1987). Nationalised Industries’ Performance’ , Economic Progress Report,
  9. (1990). Organisational Status and Performance: the effects on employment’, &plled Economics
  10. (1988). Organitational Status and Performance: a conceptual framework for testing pub1 ic choice theories’
  11. (1988). Preparing for Privatisation: the Financial Aspects’,
  12. (1971). Prickina Prvke: the Facts on State Industrv, Aims of Industry,
  13. (1986). Privatisation: a Policy in Search of a Rationale‘, doi
  14. (1988). Privatization and Public EnterDriseq, Occasional Paper 66, International Monetary Fund,
  15. (1983). Public and Private Enterprfse: comparative behaviour and relative efficiency’, in
  16. (1971). Public Enterbrise in Practice, MacGibbon
  17. (1987). Sell&g the State, Weidenfled b
  18. (1988). Service Reform: The mt
  19. (1979). Some Useful Ratios in Evaluating Performance’, Qmena: Tha doi
  20. (1964). The Ecwmic Theorv of I a_CaDitallsm’,
  21. (1988). The Public-Private Distinction in Organizat ion Theory:
  22. (1988). The Real Value of Company Accounts’, F-s, doi
  23. (1979). ublic Choim, Cambridge,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.