Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Golden Mean Between Kurt \u26 Dan: A Moderate Reading of the Ninth Amendment

By Randy E Barnett


In these remarks given at the Drake Constitutional Law Center Symposium, Professor Randy Barnett addresses his disagreement with Dan Farber\u27s view of the Ninth Amendment in his new book and with Kurt Lash\u27s view of the Ninth Amendment in his recent articles, and he asks why the Ninth Amendment and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment have been overlooked. The author explains that his view is closer to Farber\u27s; however, he asserts that the Ninth Amendment protects all fundamental liberties—not just some. He asserts that Lash incorrectly views the Ninth Amendment as protecting state majoritarianism rather than individual liberties. His argument relies on historically significant writings by Philadelphia Constitutional Convention delegate Representative Roger Sherman. The author responds to critics who worry that his broad view of liberty could permit courts to impede the workings of government by saying that rights do not receive absolute protection. Instead, his approach sensibly places the burden on the government to justify its restrictions on individual rights. Professor Barnett provided a detailed explanation of his theory in a significant recent book

Topics: Ninth Amendment, Federal power, Individual liberties, Constitutional Law
Publisher: Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.