Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Introductory Letter

By Guido Calabresi

Abstract

\u22You have never read Tacitus?\u22 Justice Hugo Black said to me on the second day of my clerkship with him, \u22Why, then, you are not a lawyer.\u22 He made me drop all else until I had read his own highly and very personally annotated Tacitus. Kant and Bentham continue to battle through the casebooks today as they did when Baron Bramwell in the 1870s said that for the convenience of mankind people must put up with such mischief as due care cannot avoid. Was Captain Vere really modelled on Melville\u27s father-in-law, the great Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw, and was Lemuel Shaw himself greatly influenced by his complicated affine? Do Edwin Meese and Robert Bork have anything to learn from the fact that Athol Fugard\u27s \u22The Blood Knot\u22 was a dramatically different play a generation ago, when Fugard first acted and directed the play in South Africa, from when he acted and directed it in New Haven recently—even though the words spoken remained the same

Topics: Law
Publisher: Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository
Year: 1988
OAI identifier: oai:digitalcommons.law.yale.edu:fss_papers-3061
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://digitalcommons.law.yale... (external link)
  • http://digitalcommons.law.yale... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.