Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

International Arbitration and Procedures to Enforce Awards in the Relationship between the United States and Germany

By Michael Kronenburg


Arbitration has long been regarded as a process that combines finality of decision with speed, low expense, and flexibility in solving problems. For these reasons, arbitration is often favored over litigation for dispute resolution. Particularly in international cases, a businessman may avoid litigation in a foreign country for various reasons: he may be unfamiliar with the proceedings; he may be afraid to find a “forum hostile” because of the different legal and cultural background of the judges; and he may wish to avoid the uncertainty concerning the law arising from the contract. Arbitration proceedings have been held constitutional by the U.S. and German Supreme Courts; however, the value and success of arbitration depend heavily on the possibility to enforce agreement and award. This paper describes the procedure of enforcement of arbitral awards in the relationship between the United States and Germany. Supreme Court decisions, i.e., a case law approach, will be employed to analyze this relationship. Chapter 1 discusses Foreign Sovereign Immunity; chapters 2 to 4 discuss the enforcement procedure for foreign arbitral awards under the UN Convention on the Recognition of Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Chapter 5 scrutinizes other mechanisms for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards

Topics: Arbitration, International Arbitration, Enforcement of Awards, Procedures to Enforce Awards, United States, Germany, United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York Convention, Friendship Treaty, Case Law, Precedent, Foreign Sovereign Immunity, Post-Award Execution, Scherk v. Alberto-Culver, Supreme Court Decisions, International Trade, Commerce, Contracts, Litigation, Dispute Resolution, Federal Arbitration Act of 1925, Zivilprozessordnung, Business Organizations Law, Comparative and Foreign Law, Contracts, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, European Law, International Trade Law, Litigation, Supreme Court of the United States
Publisher: Digital Commons @ Georgia Law
Year: 1995
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.