Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What Causes of Action May Be Joined in One Count under the Connecticut Practice Act

By Samuel O Prentice


The following memorandum of decision was rendered by Hon • . Samuel 0. Prentice, Judge of the Superior Court, in February, 1898, and is now on file in the office of the Clerk at New Haven. The action which is now pending in that Court is for the loss of goods shipped by the,plaintiff over defendant\u27s railroad. The plaintiff stated in one count that the goods were delivered to the defendant as a common carrier at common law; that at the time of the delivery of the goods certain bills of lading were also delivered to and accepted by the defendant, but that there was no consideration for the bills of lading, that they were unreasonable and unjust in their terms, and that therefore they were not binding contracts, and that the defendant had no right to the limitation of liability expressed therein. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff claimed that, in spite of the bills of lading, the defendant was liable as a common carrier at common law, and alleged the failure of the defendant to carry and deliver the goods. The plaintiff went on to say that if the bills of lading were valid, then the defendant was liable because the goods were lost through its negligence

Topics: Courts, Law
Publisher: Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository
Year: 1898
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.