Protecting Eden: markets or government?

Abstract

Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.The majority of species classified as “threatened”, “endangered” or “vulnerable” by the IUCN are to be found in government-controlled parks and legally protected areas in developing countries. Dissatisfaction with the public sector's record in protecting endangered species has prompted calls for the use of market-based instruments and other economic incentives to promote more effective environmental outcomes. In this paper, we examine whether greater reliance on market-based incentives would result in improved environmental outcomes in national parks. We address this issue by extending the literature on optimal contracts to the case of a renewable resource. We identify conditions under which private ownership or control of a national park induces more (less) efficient management of protected areas. The paper concludes with a discussion of the limitations of the analysis and the implications of these results for the conservation of biodiversity.Richard Damania and John Hatchhttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/503305/description#descriptio

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Adelaide Research & Scholarship

redirect
Last time updated on 05/08/2013

This paper was published in Adelaide Research & Scholarship.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.